Does soil history decline in influencing the structure of bacterial communities of Brassica napus host plants across different growth stages?

Soil history has been shown to condition future rhizosphere microbial communities. However, previous experiments have also illustrated that mature, adult plants can "re-write," or mask, different soil histories through host plant-soil community feedbacks. This leaves a knowledge gap concerning how soil history influences bacterial community structure across different growth stages. Thus, here we tested the hypothesis that previously established soil histories will decrease in influencing the structure of Brassica napus bacterial communities over the growing season. We used an on-going agricultural field experiment to establish three different soil histories, plots of monocrop canola (B. napus), or rotations of wheat-canola, or pea-barley-canola. During the following season, we repeatedly sampled the surrounding bulk soil, rhizosphere, and roots of the B. napus hosts at different growth stages-the initial seeding conditions, seedling, rosette, bolting, and flower-from all three soil history plots. We compared composition and diversity of the B. napus soil bacterial communities, as estimated using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding, to identify any changes associated with soil history and growth stages. We found that soil history remained significant across each growth stage in structuring the bacterial bulk soil and rhizosphere communities, but not the bacterial root communities. This suggests that the host plant's capacity to "re-write" different soil histories may be quite limited as key components that constitute the soil history's identity remain present, such that the previously established soil history continues to impact the bacterial rhizosphere communities, but not the root communities. For agriculture, this highlights how previously established soil histories persist and may have important long-term consequences on future plant-microbe communities, including bacteria.