肌电图实验设计共识(CEDE)项目:肌电图研究报告和批判性评估核对表(CEDE-Check)

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Manuela Besomi , Valter Devecchi , Deborah Falla , Kevin McGill , Matthew C. Kiernan , Roberto Merletti , Jaap H. van Dieën , Kylie Tucker , Edward A. Clancy , Karen Søgaard , François Hug , Richard G. Carson , Eric Perreault , Simon Gandevia , Thor Besier , John C. Rothwell , Roger M. Enoka , Aleš Holobar , Catherine Disselhorst-Klug , Tim Wrigley , Paul W. Hodges
{"title":"肌电图实验设计共识(CEDE)项目:肌电图研究报告和批判性评估核对表(CEDE-Check)","authors":"Manuela Besomi ,&nbsp;Valter Devecchi ,&nbsp;Deborah Falla ,&nbsp;Kevin McGill ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Kiernan ,&nbsp;Roberto Merletti ,&nbsp;Jaap H. van Dieën ,&nbsp;Kylie Tucker ,&nbsp;Edward A. Clancy ,&nbsp;Karen Søgaard ,&nbsp;François Hug ,&nbsp;Richard G. Carson ,&nbsp;Eric Perreault ,&nbsp;Simon Gandevia ,&nbsp;Thor Besier ,&nbsp;John C. Rothwell ,&nbsp;Roger M. Enoka ,&nbsp;Aleš Holobar ,&nbsp;Catherine Disselhorst-Klug ,&nbsp;Tim Wrigley ,&nbsp;Paul W. Hodges","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The diversity in electromyography (EMG) techniques and their reporting present significant challenges across multiple disciplines in research and clinical practice, where EMG is commonly used. To address these challenges and augment the reproducibility and interpretation of studies using EMG, the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project has developed a checklist (CEDE-Check) to assist researchers to thoroughly report their EMG methodologies. Development involved a multi-stage Delphi process with seventeen EMG experts from various disciplines. After two rounds, consensus was achieved. The final CEDE-Check consists of forty items that address four critical areas that demand precise reporting when EMG is employed: the task investigated, electrode placement, recording electrode characteristics, and acquisition and pre-processing of EMG signals. This checklist aims to guide researchers to accurately report and critically appraise EMG studies, thereby promoting a standardised critical evaluation, and greater scientific rigor in research that uses EMG signals. This approach not only aims to facilitate interpretation of study results and comparisons between studies, but it is also expected to contribute to advancing research quality and facilitate clinical and other practical applications of knowledge generated through the use of EMG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102874"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105064112400018X/pdfft?md5=3e5431d33515cacb4c25ca98b897dc84&pid=1-s2.0-S105064112400018X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Checklist for reporting and critically appraising studies using EMG (CEDE-Check)\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Besomi ,&nbsp;Valter Devecchi ,&nbsp;Deborah Falla ,&nbsp;Kevin McGill ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Kiernan ,&nbsp;Roberto Merletti ,&nbsp;Jaap H. van Dieën ,&nbsp;Kylie Tucker ,&nbsp;Edward A. Clancy ,&nbsp;Karen Søgaard ,&nbsp;François Hug ,&nbsp;Richard G. Carson ,&nbsp;Eric Perreault ,&nbsp;Simon Gandevia ,&nbsp;Thor Besier ,&nbsp;John C. Rothwell ,&nbsp;Roger M. Enoka ,&nbsp;Aleš Holobar ,&nbsp;Catherine Disselhorst-Klug ,&nbsp;Tim Wrigley ,&nbsp;Paul W. Hodges\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The diversity in electromyography (EMG) techniques and their reporting present significant challenges across multiple disciplines in research and clinical practice, where EMG is commonly used. To address these challenges and augment the reproducibility and interpretation of studies using EMG, the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project has developed a checklist (CEDE-Check) to assist researchers to thoroughly report their EMG methodologies. Development involved a multi-stage Delphi process with seventeen EMG experts from various disciplines. After two rounds, consensus was achieved. The final CEDE-Check consists of forty items that address four critical areas that demand precise reporting when EMG is employed: the task investigated, electrode placement, recording electrode characteristics, and acquisition and pre-processing of EMG signals. This checklist aims to guide researchers to accurately report and critically appraise EMG studies, thereby promoting a standardised critical evaluation, and greater scientific rigor in research that uses EMG signals. This approach not only aims to facilitate interpretation of study results and comparisons between studies, but it is also expected to contribute to advancing research quality and facilitate clinical and other practical applications of knowledge generated through the use of EMG.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102874\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105064112400018X/pdfft?md5=3e5431d33515cacb4c25ca98b897dc84&pid=1-s2.0-S105064112400018X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105064112400018X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105064112400018X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌电图(EMG)技术及其报告的多样性给常用肌电图的研究和临床实践中的多个学科带来了重大挑战。为了应对这些挑战,提高肌电图研究的可重复性和解释性,肌电图实验设计共识(CEDE)项目开发了一份核对表(CEDE-Check),以帮助研究人员全面报告其肌电图方法。开发工作包括与来自不同学科的 17 位 EMG 专家进行多阶段德尔菲过程。经过两轮讨论后,达成了共识。最终的 CEDE-Check 包括四十个项目,涉及使用 EMG 时需要精确报告的四个关键领域:调查任务、电极放置、记录电极特性以及 EMG 信号的采集和预处理。该核对表旨在指导研究人员准确报告和批判性评估 EMG 研究,从而促进标准化的批判性评估,提高使用 EMG 信号的研究的科学严谨性。这种方法不仅旨在促进对研究结果的解释和研究之间的比较,还可望有助于提高研究质量,促进通过使用肌电图产生的知识的临床和其他实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Checklist for reporting and critically appraising studies using EMG (CEDE-Check)

The diversity in electromyography (EMG) techniques and their reporting present significant challenges across multiple disciplines in research and clinical practice, where EMG is commonly used. To address these challenges and augment the reproducibility and interpretation of studies using EMG, the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project has developed a checklist (CEDE-Check) to assist researchers to thoroughly report their EMG methodologies. Development involved a multi-stage Delphi process with seventeen EMG experts from various disciplines. After two rounds, consensus was achieved. The final CEDE-Check consists of forty items that address four critical areas that demand precise reporting when EMG is employed: the task investigated, electrode placement, recording electrode characteristics, and acquisition and pre-processing of EMG signals. This checklist aims to guide researchers to accurately report and critically appraise EMG studies, thereby promoting a standardised critical evaluation, and greater scientific rigor in research that uses EMG signals. This approach not only aims to facilitate interpretation of study results and comparisons between studies, but it is also expected to contribute to advancing research quality and facilitate clinical and other practical applications of knowledge generated through the use of EMG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信