具有共同冲击和 CDS 交易的两家保险公司的稳健非零和随机微分博弈

IF 0.9 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Man Li, Ying Huang, Ya Huang, Jieming Zhou
{"title":"具有共同冲击和 CDS 交易的两家保险公司的稳健非零和随机微分博弈","authors":"Man Li, Ying Huang, Ya Huang, Jieming Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11579-024-00357-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper considers the non-zero-sum stochastic differential game problem between two ambiguity-averse insurers (AAIs) with common shock. Each AAI’s surplus process consists of a proportional reinsurance protection and an investment in a money account, a stock and a credit default swap (CDS) with the objective of maximizing the expected utility of her relative terminal surplus with respect to that of her competitors. We consider default contagion risk of CDSs through a Markovian model with interacting default intensities. It is worthwhile to consider the uncertainty of the model on both the insurer herself and her competitors. In our model, we describe the surplus processes of two insurers by two jump-diffusion models with a common shock. Under jump-diffusion models, the robust Nash equilibrium strategies and the value functions for the all-default, one-default and all-alive case are derived under a worst-case scenario, respectively. Finally, through some numerical examples, we found some interesting results about the effects of some model parameters on the robust Nash equilibrium strategies, such as, the common shocks and the individual claims have the opposite effect on reinsurance investment.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":48722,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics and Financial Economics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust non-zero-sum stochastic differential game of two insurers with common shock and CDS transaction\",\"authors\":\"Man Li, Ying Huang, Ya Huang, Jieming Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11579-024-00357-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper considers the non-zero-sum stochastic differential game problem between two ambiguity-averse insurers (AAIs) with common shock. Each AAI’s surplus process consists of a proportional reinsurance protection and an investment in a money account, a stock and a credit default swap (CDS) with the objective of maximizing the expected utility of her relative terminal surplus with respect to that of her competitors. We consider default contagion risk of CDSs through a Markovian model with interacting default intensities. It is worthwhile to consider the uncertainty of the model on both the insurer herself and her competitors. In our model, we describe the surplus processes of two insurers by two jump-diffusion models with a common shock. Under jump-diffusion models, the robust Nash equilibrium strategies and the value functions for the all-default, one-default and all-alive case are derived under a worst-case scenario, respectively. Finally, through some numerical examples, we found some interesting results about the effects of some model parameters on the robust Nash equilibrium strategies, such as, the common shocks and the individual claims have the opposite effect on reinsurance investment.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematics and Financial Economics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematics and Financial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-024-00357-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics and Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-024-00357-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了两个具有共同冲击的模糊规避型保险公司(AAI)之间的非零和随机差分博弈问题。每个 AAI 的盈余过程都由按比例的再保险保障以及对货币账户、股票和信用违约掉期(CDS)的投资组成,目标是最大化其相对于竞争对手的相对最终盈余的预期效用。我们通过一个违约强度相互影响的马尔可夫模型来考虑 CDS 的违约传染风险。值得考虑的是该模型对保险人本身及其竞争对手的不确定性。在我们的模型中,我们通过两个具有共同冲击的跳跃-扩散模型来描述两个保险公司的盈余过程。在跳跃扩散模型下,我们分别推导出了在最坏情况下全部违约、一次违约和全部生存情况下的稳健纳什均衡策略和价值函数。最后,通过一些数值示例,我们发现了一些模型参数对稳健纳什均衡策略影响的有趣结果,如共同冲击和个别索赔对再保险投资的影响是相反的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Robust non-zero-sum stochastic differential game of two insurers with common shock and CDS transaction

Robust non-zero-sum stochastic differential game of two insurers with common shock and CDS transaction

This paper considers the non-zero-sum stochastic differential game problem between two ambiguity-averse insurers (AAIs) with common shock. Each AAI’s surplus process consists of a proportional reinsurance protection and an investment in a money account, a stock and a credit default swap (CDS) with the objective of maximizing the expected utility of her relative terminal surplus with respect to that of her competitors. We consider default contagion risk of CDSs through a Markovian model with interacting default intensities. It is worthwhile to consider the uncertainty of the model on both the insurer herself and her competitors. In our model, we describe the surplus processes of two insurers by two jump-diffusion models with a common shock. Under jump-diffusion models, the robust Nash equilibrium strategies and the value functions for the all-default, one-default and all-alive case are derived under a worst-case scenario, respectively. Finally, through some numerical examples, we found some interesting results about the effects of some model parameters on the robust Nash equilibrium strategies, such as, the common shocks and the individual claims have the opposite effect on reinsurance investment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics and Financial Economics
Mathematics and Financial Economics MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS -
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the journal is to provide a forum for work in finance which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. The work should have real economic content and the mathematical reasoning should be new and correct.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信