{"title":"大型变额年金组合估值的稳健预测区间:五种模型的比较研究","authors":"Tingting Sun, Haoyuan Wang, Donglin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities (VAs) is a well-researched area in the actuarial science field. However, the study of producing reliable prediction intervals for prices has received comparatively less attention. Compared to point prediction, the prediction interval can calculate a reasonable price range of VAs and help investors and insurance companies better manage risk to maintain profitability and sustainability. In this study, we address this gap by utilizing five different models in conjunction with bootstrapping techniques to generate robust prediction intervals for variable annuity prices. Our findings show that the Gradient Boosting regression (GBR) model provides the narrowest intervals compared to the other four models. While the Random sample consensus (RANSAC) model has the highest coverage rate, but it has the widest interval. In practical applications, considering the trade-off between coverage rate and interval width, the GBR model would be a preferred choice. Therefore, we recommend using the gradient boosting model with the bootstrap method to calculate the prediction interval of valuation for a large portfolio of variable annuity policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50647,"journal":{"name":"Computational Economics","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust Prediction Intervals for Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities: A Comparative Study of Five Models\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Sun, Haoyuan Wang, Donglin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities (VAs) is a well-researched area in the actuarial science field. However, the study of producing reliable prediction intervals for prices has received comparatively less attention. Compared to point prediction, the prediction interval can calculate a reasonable price range of VAs and help investors and insurance companies better manage risk to maintain profitability and sustainability. In this study, we address this gap by utilizing five different models in conjunction with bootstrapping techniques to generate robust prediction intervals for variable annuity prices. Our findings show that the Gradient Boosting regression (GBR) model provides the narrowest intervals compared to the other four models. While the Random sample consensus (RANSAC) model has the highest coverage rate, but it has the widest interval. In practical applications, considering the trade-off between coverage rate and interval width, the GBR model would be a preferred choice. Therefore, we recommend using the gradient boosting model with the bootstrap method to calculate the prediction interval of valuation for a large portfolio of variable annuity policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Economics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10574-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robust Prediction Intervals for Valuation of Large Portfolios of Variable Annuities: A Comparative Study of Five Models
Valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities (VAs) is a well-researched area in the actuarial science field. However, the study of producing reliable prediction intervals for prices has received comparatively less attention. Compared to point prediction, the prediction interval can calculate a reasonable price range of VAs and help investors and insurance companies better manage risk to maintain profitability and sustainability. In this study, we address this gap by utilizing five different models in conjunction with bootstrapping techniques to generate robust prediction intervals for variable annuity prices. Our findings show that the Gradient Boosting regression (GBR) model provides the narrowest intervals compared to the other four models. While the Random sample consensus (RANSAC) model has the highest coverage rate, but it has the widest interval. In practical applications, considering the trade-off between coverage rate and interval width, the GBR model would be a preferred choice. Therefore, we recommend using the gradient boosting model with the bootstrap method to calculate the prediction interval of valuation for a large portfolio of variable annuity policies.
期刊介绍:
Computational Economics, the official journal of the Society for Computational Economics, presents new research in a rapidly growing multidisciplinary field that uses advanced computing capabilities to understand and solve complex problems from all branches in economics. The topics of Computational Economics include computational methods in econometrics like filtering, bayesian and non-parametric approaches, markov processes and monte carlo simulation; agent based methods, machine learning, evolutionary algorithms, (neural) network modeling; computational aspects of dynamic systems, optimization, optimal control, games, equilibrium modeling; hardware and software developments, modeling languages, interfaces, symbolic processing, distributed and parallel processing