Darnell K Adrian Williams, Gillian Graifman, Nowair Hussain, Maytal Amiel, Tran Priscilla, Arjun Reddy, Ali Haider, Bali Kumar Kavitesh, Austin Li, Leael Alishahian, Nichelle Perera, Corey Efros, Myoungmee Babu, Mathew Tharakan, Mill Etienne, Benson Babu
{"title":"数字病理学、深度学习与癌症:叙事回顾","authors":"Darnell K Adrian Williams, Gillian Graifman, Nowair Hussain, Maytal Amiel, Tran Priscilla, Arjun Reddy, Ali Haider, Bali Kumar Kavitesh, Austin Li, Leael Alishahian, Nichelle Perera, Corey Efros, Myoungmee Babu, Mathew Tharakan, Mill Etienne, Benson Babu","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.14.24304308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The emergence of digital pathology and deep learning technologies signifies a transformative era in healthcare. These technologies can enhance cancer detection, streamline operations, and bolster patient care. A substantial gap exists between the development phase of deep learning models in controlled laboratory environments and their translations into clinical practice. This narrative review evaluates the current landscape of deep learning and digital pathology, analyzing the factors influencing model development and implementation into clinical practice.\nMethods: We searched multiple databases, including Web of Science, Arxiv, MedRxiv, BioRxiv, Embase, PubMed, DBLP, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane, targeting articles on whole slide imaging and deep learning published from 2014 and 2023. Out of 776 articles identified based on inclusion criteria, we selected 36 papers for the analysis.\nKey Content and Findings: Most articles in this review focus on the in-laboratory phase of deep learning model development, a critical stage in the deep learning lifecycle. Challenges arise during model development and their integration into clinical practice. Notably, lab performance metrics may not always match real-world clinical outcomes. As technology advances and regulations evolve, we expect more clinical trials to bridge this performance gap and validate deep learning models' effectiveness in clinical care. High clinical accuracy is vital for informed decision-making throughout a patient's cancer care.\nConclusions: Deep learning technology can enhance cancer detection, clinical workflows, and patient care. Challenges may arise during model development. The deep learning lifecycle involves data preprocessing, model development, and clinical implementation. Achieving health equity requires including diverse patient groups and eliminating bias during implementation. While model development is integral, most articles focus on the pre-deployment phase. Future longitudinal studies are crucial for validating models in real-world settings post-deployment. A collaborative approach among computational pathologists, technologists, industry, and healthcare providers is essential for driving adoption in clinical settings.\nKeywords: Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Digital Pathology, Computational Pathology, Cancer","PeriodicalId":501528,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pathology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Pathology, Deep Learning, and Cancer: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Darnell K Adrian Williams, Gillian Graifman, Nowair Hussain, Maytal Amiel, Tran Priscilla, Arjun Reddy, Ali Haider, Bali Kumar Kavitesh, Austin Li, Leael Alishahian, Nichelle Perera, Corey Efros, Myoungmee Babu, Mathew Tharakan, Mill Etienne, Benson Babu\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.14.24304308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objective: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The emergence of digital pathology and deep learning technologies signifies a transformative era in healthcare. These technologies can enhance cancer detection, streamline operations, and bolster patient care. A substantial gap exists between the development phase of deep learning models in controlled laboratory environments and their translations into clinical practice. This narrative review evaluates the current landscape of deep learning and digital pathology, analyzing the factors influencing model development and implementation into clinical practice.\\nMethods: We searched multiple databases, including Web of Science, Arxiv, MedRxiv, BioRxiv, Embase, PubMed, DBLP, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane, targeting articles on whole slide imaging and deep learning published from 2014 and 2023. Out of 776 articles identified based on inclusion criteria, we selected 36 papers for the analysis.\\nKey Content and Findings: Most articles in this review focus on the in-laboratory phase of deep learning model development, a critical stage in the deep learning lifecycle. Challenges arise during model development and their integration into clinical practice. Notably, lab performance metrics may not always match real-world clinical outcomes. As technology advances and regulations evolve, we expect more clinical trials to bridge this performance gap and validate deep learning models' effectiveness in clinical care. High clinical accuracy is vital for informed decision-making throughout a patient's cancer care.\\nConclusions: Deep learning technology can enhance cancer detection, clinical workflows, and patient care. Challenges may arise during model development. The deep learning lifecycle involves data preprocessing, model development, and clinical implementation. Achieving health equity requires including diverse patient groups and eliminating bias during implementation. While model development is integral, most articles focus on the pre-deployment phase. Future longitudinal studies are crucial for validating models in real-world settings post-deployment. A collaborative approach among computational pathologists, technologists, industry, and healthcare providers is essential for driving adoption in clinical settings.\\nKeywords: Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Digital Pathology, Computational Pathology, Cancer\",\"PeriodicalId\":501528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pathology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:癌症是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。数字病理学和深度学习技术的出现标志着医疗保健领域进入了一个变革时代。这些技术可以提高癌症检测能力、简化操作并加强对患者的护理。在受控实验室环境中开发深度学习模型与将其应用于临床实践之间存在着巨大差距。这篇叙述性综述评估了深度学习和数字病理学的现状,分析了影响模型开发和应用于临床实践的因素:我们检索了多个数据库,包括 Web of Science、Arxiv、MedRxiv、BioRxiv、Embase、PubMed、DBLP、Google Scholar、IEEE Xplore 和 Cochrane,锁定了 2014 年至 2023 年间发表的有关全切片成像和深度学习的文章。在根据纳入标准确定的 776 篇文章中,我们选择了 36 篇论文进行分析:本综述中的大多数文章都关注深度学习模型开发的实验室内阶段,这是深度学习生命周期中的一个关键阶段。在模型开发及其与临床实践相结合的过程中会遇到各种挑战。值得注意的是,实验室性能指标并不总是与真实世界的临床结果相匹配。随着技术的进步和法规的发展,我们期待更多的临床试验来弥补这一性能差距,并验证深度学习模型在临床护理中的有效性。高临床准确性对于患者整个癌症治疗过程中的知情决策至关重要:结论:深度学习技术可以提高癌症检测、临床工作流程和患者护理水平。模型开发过程中可能会遇到挑战。深度学习的生命周期包括数据预处理、模型开发和临床实施。要实现健康公平,就必须纳入不同的患者群体,并在实施过程中消除偏见。虽然模型开发不可或缺,但大多数文章都侧重于部署前阶段。未来的纵向研究对于在部署后的实际环境中验证模型至关重要。计算病理学家、技术专家、行业和医疗服务提供者之间的合作对于推动临床应用至关重要:人工智能 深度学习 数字病理学 计算病理学 癌症
Digital Pathology, Deep Learning, and Cancer: A Narrative Review
Background and Objective: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The emergence of digital pathology and deep learning technologies signifies a transformative era in healthcare. These technologies can enhance cancer detection, streamline operations, and bolster patient care. A substantial gap exists between the development phase of deep learning models in controlled laboratory environments and their translations into clinical practice. This narrative review evaluates the current landscape of deep learning and digital pathology, analyzing the factors influencing model development and implementation into clinical practice.
Methods: We searched multiple databases, including Web of Science, Arxiv, MedRxiv, BioRxiv, Embase, PubMed, DBLP, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Cochrane, targeting articles on whole slide imaging and deep learning published from 2014 and 2023. Out of 776 articles identified based on inclusion criteria, we selected 36 papers for the analysis.
Key Content and Findings: Most articles in this review focus on the in-laboratory phase of deep learning model development, a critical stage in the deep learning lifecycle. Challenges arise during model development and their integration into clinical practice. Notably, lab performance metrics may not always match real-world clinical outcomes. As technology advances and regulations evolve, we expect more clinical trials to bridge this performance gap and validate deep learning models' effectiveness in clinical care. High clinical accuracy is vital for informed decision-making throughout a patient's cancer care.
Conclusions: Deep learning technology can enhance cancer detection, clinical workflows, and patient care. Challenges may arise during model development. The deep learning lifecycle involves data preprocessing, model development, and clinical implementation. Achieving health equity requires including diverse patient groups and eliminating bias during implementation. While model development is integral, most articles focus on the pre-deployment phase. Future longitudinal studies are crucial for validating models in real-world settings post-deployment. A collaborative approach among computational pathologists, technologists, industry, and healthcare providers is essential for driving adoption in clinical settings.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Digital Pathology, Computational Pathology, Cancer