利用 FDG-PET 确定头颈部癌症口腔调强放射治疗靶体积的有效性和安全性

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yasuo Kosugi, Keisuke Sasai, Naoya Murakami, Tatsuki Karino, Yoichi Muramoto, Terufumi Kawamoto, Masaki Oshima, Noriyuki Okonogi, Jun Takatsu, Kotaro Iijima, Shuhei Karube, Akira Isobe, Naoya Hara, Mitsuhisa Fujimaki, Shinichi Ohba, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Koji Murakami, Naoto Shikama
{"title":"利用 FDG-PET 确定头颈部癌症口腔调强放射治疗靶体积的有效性和安全性","authors":"Yasuo Kosugi, Keisuke Sasai, Naoya Murakami, Tatsuki Karino, Yoichi Muramoto, Terufumi Kawamoto, Masaki Oshima, Noriyuki Okonogi, Jun Takatsu, Kotaro Iijima, Shuhei Karube, Akira Isobe, Naoya Hara, Mitsuhisa Fujimaki, Shinichi Ohba, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Koji Murakami, Naoto Shikama","doi":"10.1186/s41824-024-00197-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the efficacy and safety of target volume determination by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx. We prospectively treated 10 consecutive consenting patients with HNSCC using IMRT, with target volumes determined by PET-CT. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) at the oral level were determined by two radiation oncologists for CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PET-CT. Differences in target volume (GTVPET, GTVCT, GTVMRI, CTVPET, CTVCT, and CTVMRI) for each modality and the interobserver variability of the target volume were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Clinical outcomes, including acute adverse events (AEs) and local control were evaluated. The mean GTV was smallest for GTVPET, followed by GTVCT and GTVMRI. There was a significant difference between GTVPET and GTVMRI, but not between the other two groups. The interobserver variability of target volume with PET-CT was significantly less than that with CT or MRI for GTV and tended to be less for CTV, but there was no significant difference in CTV between the modalities. Grade ≤ 3 acute dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia occurred in 55%, 88%, and 22% of patients, respectively, but no grade 4 AEs were observed. There was no local recurrence at the oral level after a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 15–55 months). The results suggest that the target volume determined by PET-CT could safely reduce GTV size and interobserver variability in patients with locally advanced HNSCC extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx undergoing IMRT. Trial registration UMIN, UMIN000033007. Registered 16 jun 2018, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037631 ","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of FDG-PET for determining target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer involving the oral level\",\"authors\":\"Yasuo Kosugi, Keisuke Sasai, Naoya Murakami, Tatsuki Karino, Yoichi Muramoto, Terufumi Kawamoto, Masaki Oshima, Noriyuki Okonogi, Jun Takatsu, Kotaro Iijima, Shuhei Karube, Akira Isobe, Naoya Hara, Mitsuhisa Fujimaki, Shinichi Ohba, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Koji Murakami, Naoto Shikama\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-024-00197-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To determine the efficacy and safety of target volume determination by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx. We prospectively treated 10 consecutive consenting patients with HNSCC using IMRT, with target volumes determined by PET-CT. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) at the oral level were determined by two radiation oncologists for CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PET-CT. Differences in target volume (GTVPET, GTVCT, GTVMRI, CTVPET, CTVCT, and CTVMRI) for each modality and the interobserver variability of the target volume were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Clinical outcomes, including acute adverse events (AEs) and local control were evaluated. The mean GTV was smallest for GTVPET, followed by GTVCT and GTVMRI. There was a significant difference between GTVPET and GTVMRI, but not between the other two groups. The interobserver variability of target volume with PET-CT was significantly less than that with CT or MRI for GTV and tended to be less for CTV, but there was no significant difference in CTV between the modalities. Grade ≤ 3 acute dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia occurred in 55%, 88%, and 22% of patients, respectively, but no grade 4 AEs were observed. There was no local recurrence at the oral level after a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 15–55 months). The results suggest that the target volume determined by PET-CT could safely reduce GTV size and interobserver variability in patients with locally advanced HNSCC extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx undergoing IMRT. Trial registration UMIN, UMIN000033007. Registered 16 jun 2018, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037631 \",\"PeriodicalId\":36160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-024-00197-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-024-00197-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定用 18F 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)确定局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)扩展到口腔或口咽部的调强放射治疗(IMRT)靶体积的有效性和安全性。我们使用 IMRT 对 10 名连续同意的 HNSCC 患者进行了前瞻性治疗,并通过 PET-CT 确定了靶体积。口腔水平的肿瘤总体积(GTV)和临床靶体积(CTV)由两名放射肿瘤专家通过 CT、磁共振成像(MRI)和 PET-CT 确定。使用戴斯相似系数和豪斯多夫距离评估了每种模式的靶体积差异(GTVPET、GTVCT、GTVMRI、CTVPET、CTVCT 和 CTVMRI)以及靶体积的观察者间变异性。对包括急性不良事件(AE)和局部控制在内的临床结果进行了评估。GTVPET的平均GTV最小,其次是GTVCT和GTVMRI。GTVPET和GTVMRI之间有明显差异,但其他两组之间没有差异。就 GTV 而言,PET-CT 对靶体积的观察者间变异性明显小于 CT 或 MRI,而就 CTV 而言,观察者间变异性也趋于较小,但两种模式之间在 CTV 方面没有明显差异。分别有55%、88%和22%的患者出现≤3级急性皮炎、粘膜炎和吞咽困难,但未观察到4级AE。中位随访期为 37 个月(15-55 个月),没有发现口腔局部复发。结果表明,PET-CT确定的靶体积可以安全地减少接受IMRT的局部晚期HNSCC患者的GTV大小和观察者之间的变异性。试验注册 UMIN,UMIN000033007。注册时间:2018年6月16日,https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037631
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of FDG-PET for determining target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer involving the oral level
To determine the efficacy and safety of target volume determination by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx. We prospectively treated 10 consecutive consenting patients with HNSCC using IMRT, with target volumes determined by PET-CT. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) at the oral level were determined by two radiation oncologists for CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PET-CT. Differences in target volume (GTVPET, GTVCT, GTVMRI, CTVPET, CTVCT, and CTVMRI) for each modality and the interobserver variability of the target volume were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Clinical outcomes, including acute adverse events (AEs) and local control were evaluated. The mean GTV was smallest for GTVPET, followed by GTVCT and GTVMRI. There was a significant difference between GTVPET and GTVMRI, but not between the other two groups. The interobserver variability of target volume with PET-CT was significantly less than that with CT or MRI for GTV and tended to be less for CTV, but there was no significant difference in CTV between the modalities. Grade ≤ 3 acute dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia occurred in 55%, 88%, and 22% of patients, respectively, but no grade 4 AEs were observed. There was no local recurrence at the oral level after a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 15–55 months). The results suggest that the target volume determined by PET-CT could safely reduce GTV size and interobserver variability in patients with locally advanced HNSCC extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx undergoing IMRT. Trial registration UMIN, UMIN000033007. Registered 16 jun 2018, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037631
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信