专家如何解读圣经?使用 "大声思考 "协议描述文学和历史的圣经解释方法

IF 1.1 0 RELIGION
Ehud Tsemach
{"title":"专家如何解读圣经?使用 \"大声思考 \"协议描述文学和历史的圣经解释方法","authors":"Ehud Tsemach","doi":"10.1007/s40839-024-00222-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study describes the thinking strategies and epistemological stances of two Bible experts, who applied a literary and historical interpretive approach, respectively. A thinking-aloud protocols methodology was used as the two scholars read the same biblical story and verbalized their thoughts. The findings reveal intricate relationships between thinking strategies and interpretive approaches. The two scholars use similar thinking strategies, yet apply them within distinct epistemological stances and reading objectives. Both apply close reading; recall commentaries; syntactic and grammatical analysis. Both connect the story with other biblical texts. However, their reading goals differ. One applies strategies that deconstruct the biblical story to different sources and restore the Urtext. The other applies a reading approach that conceives the text as a unified literary work. He constructs possible meanings and messages from the story using literary criticism tools, relating to literary genres, and actualizing the ancient text. I discuss how these findings contribute to the literature about Bible scholarship and religious education and its pedagogical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do experts read the Bible? Descriptions of literary and historical approaches to biblical interpretation using thinking-aloud protocols\",\"authors\":\"Ehud Tsemach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40839-024-00222-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study describes the thinking strategies and epistemological stances of two Bible experts, who applied a literary and historical interpretive approach, respectively. A thinking-aloud protocols methodology was used as the two scholars read the same biblical story and verbalized their thoughts. The findings reveal intricate relationships between thinking strategies and interpretive approaches. The two scholars use similar thinking strategies, yet apply them within distinct epistemological stances and reading objectives. Both apply close reading; recall commentaries; syntactic and grammatical analysis. Both connect the story with other biblical texts. However, their reading goals differ. One applies strategies that deconstruct the biblical story to different sources and restore the Urtext. The other applies a reading approach that conceives the text as a unified literary work. He constructs possible meanings and messages from the story using literary criticism tools, relating to literary genres, and actualizing the ancient text. I discuss how these findings contribute to the literature about Bible scholarship and religious education and its pedagogical implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religious Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religious Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-024-00222-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-024-00222-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究描述了两位圣经专家的思维策略和认识论立场,他们分别采用了文学阐释法和历史阐释法。研究采用了 "朗读思考"(think-aloud protocols)的方法,让两位学者朗读同一个圣经故事,并说出他们的想法。研究结果揭示了思维策略与解释方法之间错综复杂的关系。两位学者使用类似的思维策略,但在不同的认识论立场和阅读目标下运用这些策略。两人都运用了精读、回想注释、句法和语法分析等方法。两人都将故事与其他圣经文本联系起来。然而,他们的阅读目标却有所不同。一个采用的策略是根据不同的资料来源解构圣经故事,还原原文。而另一种阅读方法则将文本视为统一的文学作品。他使用文学批评工具从故事中构建可能的意义和信息,与文学流派相关联,并将古代文本现实化。我将讨论这些发现如何对有关圣经学术和宗教教育的文献及其教学意义做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do experts read the Bible? Descriptions of literary and historical approaches to biblical interpretation using thinking-aloud protocols

This study describes the thinking strategies and epistemological stances of two Bible experts, who applied a literary and historical interpretive approach, respectively. A thinking-aloud protocols methodology was used as the two scholars read the same biblical story and verbalized their thoughts. The findings reveal intricate relationships between thinking strategies and interpretive approaches. The two scholars use similar thinking strategies, yet apply them within distinct epistemological stances and reading objectives. Both apply close reading; recall commentaries; syntactic and grammatical analysis. Both connect the story with other biblical texts. However, their reading goals differ. One applies strategies that deconstruct the biblical story to different sources and restore the Urtext. The other applies a reading approach that conceives the text as a unified literary work. He constructs possible meanings and messages from the story using literary criticism tools, relating to literary genres, and actualizing the ancient text. I discuss how these findings contribute to the literature about Bible scholarship and religious education and its pedagogical implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Religious Education is a refereed publication for the academic exploration of the task of religious education in modern society. The journal helps disseminate original writings and research in religious education and catechesis - particularly as it relates to the faith formation of children and young people. Articles for publication on religious education in various contexts and on related areas, as well as book reviews are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信