{"title":"语义变化和社会语义变异:Reddit上与COVID相关的新词案例","authors":"Quirin Würschinger, Barbara McGillivray","doi":"10.1515/lingvan-2023-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 has triggered innovations in science and society globally, leading to the emergence or establishment of formal neologisms such as <jats:italic>infodemic</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>working from home</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>WFH</jats:italic>). While previous work on COVID-related lexical innovation has focused on such formal neologisms, this paper uses data from Reddit to study semantic neologisms like <jats:italic>lockdown</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>mask</jats:italic>, which have changed in meaning due to the pandemic. First, we identify words that have undergone meaning changes since the start of the pandemic. Our approach, based on word embeddings, successfully detects a variety of COVID-related terms that dominate the resulting list of semantic neologisms. Next, we generate community-specific semantic representations for the communities <jats:italic>r/Coronavirus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>r/conspiracy</jats:italic>, which are both highly engaged in COVID-related discourse. We analyse socio-semantic variation along two dimensions: an evaluative dimension, based on amelioration/pejorization, and the loyalty/betrayal dimension of Moral Foundations Theory. Our findings reveal that the detected semantic neologisms exhibit more negative and betrayal-related associations in <jats:italic>r/conspiracy</jats:italic>, a subreddit critical of COVID-related sociopolitical measures. Mapping the community-specific representations for the term <jats:italic>vaccines</jats:italic> on a shared semantic space confirms these differences and reveals more fine-grained denotational and connotational differences between the two communities.","PeriodicalId":55960,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics Vanguard","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semantic change and socio-semantic variation: the case of COVID-related neologisms on Reddit\",\"authors\":\"Quirin Würschinger, Barbara McGillivray\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/lingvan-2023-0106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID-19 has triggered innovations in science and society globally, leading to the emergence or establishment of formal neologisms such as <jats:italic>infodemic</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>working from home</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>WFH</jats:italic>). While previous work on COVID-related lexical innovation has focused on such formal neologisms, this paper uses data from Reddit to study semantic neologisms like <jats:italic>lockdown</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>mask</jats:italic>, which have changed in meaning due to the pandemic. First, we identify words that have undergone meaning changes since the start of the pandemic. Our approach, based on word embeddings, successfully detects a variety of COVID-related terms that dominate the resulting list of semantic neologisms. Next, we generate community-specific semantic representations for the communities <jats:italic>r/Coronavirus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>r/conspiracy</jats:italic>, which are both highly engaged in COVID-related discourse. We analyse socio-semantic variation along two dimensions: an evaluative dimension, based on amelioration/pejorization, and the loyalty/betrayal dimension of Moral Foundations Theory. Our findings reveal that the detected semantic neologisms exhibit more negative and betrayal-related associations in <jats:italic>r/conspiracy</jats:italic>, a subreddit critical of COVID-related sociopolitical measures. Mapping the community-specific representations for the term <jats:italic>vaccines</jats:italic> on a shared semantic space confirms these differences and reveals more fine-grained denotational and connotational differences between the two communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics Vanguard\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics Vanguard","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2023-0106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
COVID-19 在全球范围内引发了科学和社会的创新,导致了诸如 infodemic 和 working from home (WFH) 等正式新词的出现或确立。以往有关 COVID 相关词汇创新的研究主要集中在此类正式新词上,而本文则利用 Reddit 上的数据研究了锁定(lockdown)和面具(mask)等语义新词,这些词的含义因大流行而发生了变化。首先,我们识别了自大流行病开始以来意义发生变化的词语。我们基于词嵌入的方法成功地检测出了各种与 COVID 相关的词汇,这些词汇在由此产生的语义新词列表中占据了主导地位。接下来,我们为高度参与 COVID 相关讨论的 r/Coronavirus 和 r/conspiracy 社区生成了特定社区的语义表征。我们从两个维度分析了社会语义变异:基于改善/贬低的评价维度和道德基础理论的忠诚/背叛维度。我们的研究结果表明,在对 COVID 相关社会政治措施持批评态度的 r/conspiracy 子reddit 中,检测到的语义新词表现出更多与背叛相关的负面关联。在共享语义空间上绘制疫苗一词的特定社区表征图证实了这些差异,并揭示了两个社区在指称和内涵方面更细微的差异。
Semantic change and socio-semantic variation: the case of COVID-related neologisms on Reddit
COVID-19 has triggered innovations in science and society globally, leading to the emergence or establishment of formal neologisms such as infodemic and working from home (WFH). While previous work on COVID-related lexical innovation has focused on such formal neologisms, this paper uses data from Reddit to study semantic neologisms like lockdown and mask, which have changed in meaning due to the pandemic. First, we identify words that have undergone meaning changes since the start of the pandemic. Our approach, based on word embeddings, successfully detects a variety of COVID-related terms that dominate the resulting list of semantic neologisms. Next, we generate community-specific semantic representations for the communities r/Coronavirus and r/conspiracy, which are both highly engaged in COVID-related discourse. We analyse socio-semantic variation along two dimensions: an evaluative dimension, based on amelioration/pejorization, and the loyalty/betrayal dimension of Moral Foundations Theory. Our findings reveal that the detected semantic neologisms exhibit more negative and betrayal-related associations in r/conspiracy, a subreddit critical of COVID-related sociopolitical measures. Mapping the community-specific representations for the term vaccines on a shared semantic space confirms these differences and reveals more fine-grained denotational and connotational differences between the two communities.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics Vanguard is a new channel for high quality articles and innovative approaches in all major fields of linguistics. This multimodal journal is published solely online and provides an accessible platform supporting both traditional and new kinds of publications. Linguistics Vanguard seeks to publish concise and up-to-date reports on the state of the art in linguistics as well as cutting-edge research papers. With its topical breadth of coverage and anticipated quick rate of production, it is one of the leading platforms for scientific exchange in linguistics. Its broad theoretical range, international scope, and diversity of article formats engage students and scholars alike. All topics within linguistics are welcome. The journal especially encourages submissions taking advantage of its new multimodal platform designed to integrate interactive content, including audio and video, images, maps, software code, raw data, and any other media that enhances the traditional written word. The novel platform and concise article format allows for rapid turnaround of submissions. Full peer review assures quality and enables authors to receive appropriate credit for their work. The journal publishes general submissions as well as special collections. Ideas for special collections may be submitted to the editors for consideration.