了解西澳大利亚州两家医疗服务机构的护士和助产士的研究能力和文化

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Carrie Janerka , Gavin D. Leslie , Olivia Gallagher , Melissa Mellan , Marguerite Lane , Fenella J. Gill
{"title":"了解西澳大利亚州两家医疗服务机构的护士和助产士的研究能力和文化","authors":"Carrie Janerka ,&nbsp;Gavin D. Leslie ,&nbsp;Olivia Gallagher ,&nbsp;Melissa Mellan ,&nbsp;Marguerite Lane ,&nbsp;Fenella J. Gill","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health services with a strong research culture report better patient outcomes and organisational performance. Measuring research capacity and culture (RCC) is important for understanding baseline research capabilities of a health service and assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building and culture-improving interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe the RCC of nurses and midwives in two health services in Western Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey of nurses and midwives was undertaken using a previously validated RCC tool to measure RCC in individual, professional group, and organisational domains, and identify barriers, enablers, and research activity. Staff at each health service were recruited via email during a three-month period in 2022. Quantitative data were analysed for descriptive statistics. Qualitative comments underwent content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred nurses and midwives completed the survey. Research capacity was low to moderate at the individual and group domains and moderate in the organisational domain. Participation in research activities was generally low. Top barriers for research involved lack of time and backfill, and other work roles taking priority, whilst top enablers were skill development, job satisfaction, and addressing identified problems. The results appeared similar across the two services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings align with previous studies, indicating that research capacity continues to be limited for nurses and midwives. Organisations should acknowledge key barriers and enablers for research and implement targeted capacity-building and culture-improving strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 137-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000027/pdfft?md5=1d80cfd74d035dbfc1f759b0bd1714d3&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000027-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding research capacity and culture of nurses and midwives in two health services in Western Australia\",\"authors\":\"Carrie Janerka ,&nbsp;Gavin D. Leslie ,&nbsp;Olivia Gallagher ,&nbsp;Melissa Mellan ,&nbsp;Marguerite Lane ,&nbsp;Fenella J. Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health services with a strong research culture report better patient outcomes and organisational performance. Measuring research capacity and culture (RCC) is important for understanding baseline research capabilities of a health service and assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building and culture-improving interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe the RCC of nurses and midwives in two health services in Western Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey of nurses and midwives was undertaken using a previously validated RCC tool to measure RCC in individual, professional group, and organisational domains, and identify barriers, enablers, and research activity. Staff at each health service were recruited via email during a three-month period in 2022. Quantitative data were analysed for descriptive statistics. Qualitative comments underwent content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred nurses and midwives completed the survey. Research capacity was low to moderate at the individual and group domains and moderate in the organisational domain. Participation in research activities was generally low. Top barriers for research involved lack of time and backfill, and other work roles taking priority, whilst top enablers were skill development, job satisfaction, and addressing identified problems. The results appeared similar across the two services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings align with previous studies, indicating that research capacity continues to be limited for nurses and midwives. Organisations should acknowledge key barriers and enablers for research and implement targeted capacity-building and culture-improving strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 137-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000027/pdfft?md5=1d80cfd74d035dbfc1f759b0bd1714d3&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000027-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拥有浓厚科研文化的医疗卫生服务机构能为患者提供更好的治疗效果,并取得更好的组织绩效。衡量研究能力和文化(RCC)对于了解医疗服务机构的基本研究能力以及评估能力建设和文化改进干预措施的效果非常重要。描述西澳大利亚州两家医疗服务机构的护士和助产士的研究能力和文化。使用之前经过验证的 RCC 工具对护士和助产士进行了横向调查,以衡量个人、专业团体和组织领域的 RCC,并确定研究活动的障碍、促进因素和研究活动。在 2022 年的三个月期间,通过电子邮件招募了各医疗服务机构的工作人员。对定量数据进行了描述性统计分析。对定性评论进行了内容分析。300 名护士和助产士完成了调查。研究能力在个人和团体领域为中低水平,在组织领域为中等水平。参与研究活动的程度普遍较低。研究的最大障碍是缺乏时间和后补、优先考虑其他工作角色,而最大的促进因素是技能发展、工作满意度和解决已发现的问题。两种服务的结果似乎相似。研究结果与之前的研究结果一致,表明护士和助产士的研究能力仍然有限。各组织应认识到研究的主要障碍和促进因素,并实施有针对性的能力建设和文化改善策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding research capacity and culture of nurses and midwives in two health services in Western Australia

Background

Health services with a strong research culture report better patient outcomes and organisational performance. Measuring research capacity and culture (RCC) is important for understanding baseline research capabilities of a health service and assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building and culture-improving interventions.

Aim

To describe the RCC of nurses and midwives in two health services in Western Australia.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of nurses and midwives was undertaken using a previously validated RCC tool to measure RCC in individual, professional group, and organisational domains, and identify barriers, enablers, and research activity. Staff at each health service were recruited via email during a three-month period in 2022. Quantitative data were analysed for descriptive statistics. Qualitative comments underwent content analysis.

Results

Three hundred nurses and midwives completed the survey. Research capacity was low to moderate at the individual and group domains and moderate in the organisational domain. Participation in research activities was generally low. Top barriers for research involved lack of time and backfill, and other work roles taking priority, whilst top enablers were skill development, job satisfaction, and addressing identified problems. The results appeared similar across the two services.

Conclusions

The findings align with previous studies, indicating that research capacity continues to be limited for nurses and midwives. Organisations should acknowledge key barriers and enablers for research and implement targeted capacity-building and culture-improving strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信