荨麻疹的治疗:中国一项医院多中心研究的结果

IF 0.7 4区 医学
Xin Wang, Lin-Feng Li
{"title":"荨麻疹的治疗:中国一项医院多中心研究的结果","authors":"Xin Wang, Lin-Feng Li","doi":"10.1177/1721727x241238954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Therapeutics of urticaria in Chinese outpatients remain to be illustrated.Objectives: To investigate clinical treatment of outpatients with urticaria, and provide real-world evidence for selection of medication regimens.Methods: In this hospital-based multicenter study, urticaria outpatients filled in a questionnaire at initial visit and were followed-up (once per week, for 4 weeks).Results: We recruited 1715 urticaria outpatients and 647 completed 4 week’s follow-up. Their total UAS7 was reduced (27.44 at baseline, 16.87 in 1 week, 12.39 in 2 weeks, 7.21 in 3 weeks, 4.2 in 4 weeks). 71.8% patients recovered from urticaria (therapy was highly effective in 11%, whereas effective in 14.2%). The second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) (at conventional dose) were the most commonly prescribed drugs, with ebastine, levocetirizine and olopatadine being the leading ones (41.1%, 36.2%, and 16%, respectively). Combinations of several antihistamines (649 cases, 37.8%) at conventional dose were far more common than a single drug at escalated dose (59 cases, 3.4%). The combination of ebastine with levocetirizine was the most frequent options (18.25%, 313 cases), followed by combination of ebastine with compound glycyrrhizin (18.2%, 312 cases). The usage rates of tripterygium glycoside (19.6%), hydroxychloroquine (17.2%) and system application glucocorticoids (5.5%) in angioedema were much higher than in symptomatic dermographism and chronic spontaneous urticaria.Conclusions: This study identifies curative therapy for Chinese outpatients with urticaria. The sgAHs, especially ebastine, are the most commonly prescribed drugs. Olopatadine has fast-acting and curative effects. Compound glycyrrhizin holds potential as a versatile collaborator. Combinations of several antihistamines at conventional dose is common.","PeriodicalId":11913,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Inflammation","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutics of urticaria: Results from a hospital-based multicenter study in China\",\"authors\":\"Xin Wang, Lin-Feng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1721727x241238954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Therapeutics of urticaria in Chinese outpatients remain to be illustrated.Objectives: To investigate clinical treatment of outpatients with urticaria, and provide real-world evidence for selection of medication regimens.Methods: In this hospital-based multicenter study, urticaria outpatients filled in a questionnaire at initial visit and were followed-up (once per week, for 4 weeks).Results: We recruited 1715 urticaria outpatients and 647 completed 4 week’s follow-up. Their total UAS7 was reduced (27.44 at baseline, 16.87 in 1 week, 12.39 in 2 weeks, 7.21 in 3 weeks, 4.2 in 4 weeks). 71.8% patients recovered from urticaria (therapy was highly effective in 11%, whereas effective in 14.2%). The second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) (at conventional dose) were the most commonly prescribed drugs, with ebastine, levocetirizine and olopatadine being the leading ones (41.1%, 36.2%, and 16%, respectively). Combinations of several antihistamines (649 cases, 37.8%) at conventional dose were far more common than a single drug at escalated dose (59 cases, 3.4%). The combination of ebastine with levocetirizine was the most frequent options (18.25%, 313 cases), followed by combination of ebastine with compound glycyrrhizin (18.2%, 312 cases). The usage rates of tripterygium glycoside (19.6%), hydroxychloroquine (17.2%) and system application glucocorticoids (5.5%) in angioedema were much higher than in symptomatic dermographism and chronic spontaneous urticaria.Conclusions: This study identifies curative therapy for Chinese outpatients with urticaria. The sgAHs, especially ebastine, are the most commonly prescribed drugs. Olopatadine has fast-acting and curative effects. Compound glycyrrhizin holds potential as a versatile collaborator. Combinations of several antihistamines at conventional dose is common.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Inflammation\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727x241238954\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727x241238954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景中国门诊患者的荨麻疹治疗仍有待说明:调查荨麻疹门诊患者的临床治疗情况,为选择用药方案提供真实证据:在这项以医院为基础的多中心研究中,荨麻疹门诊患者在初诊时填写问卷,并接受随访(每周一次,为期4周):结果:我们共招募了 1715 名荨麻疹门诊患者,其中 647 人完成了为期 4 周的随访。他们的 UAS7 总值有所下降(基线时为 27.44,1 周后为 16.87,2 周后为 12.39,3 周后为 7.21,4 周后为 4.2)。71.8%的患者从荨麻疹中康复(11%的患者疗效显著,14.2%的患者疗效一般)。第二代 H1 抗组胺药(sgAHs)(常规剂量)是最常用的处方药,其中以依巴斯汀、左西替利嗪和奥洛帕他定为主(分别占 41.1%、36.2% 和 16%)。常规剂量的多种抗组胺药联合用药(649 例,37.8%)远比加大剂量的单一药物(59 例,3.4%)更为常见。依巴斯汀与左西替利嗪的联合用药是最常见的选择(18.25%,313 例),其次是依巴斯汀与复方甘草酸苷的联合用药(18.2%,312 例)。血管性水肿患者使用三叶皂苷(19.6%)、羟氯喹(17.2%)和全身应用糖皮质激素(5.5%)的比例远高于症状性皮炎和慢性自发性荨麻疹患者:本研究确定了中国门诊荨麻疹患者的治疗方法。结论:本研究确定了中国门诊荨麻疹患者的治疗方法,其中sgAHs,尤其是依巴斯汀,是最常用的处方药。奥洛他定起效快、疗效好。复方甘草酸苷具有多功能合作者的潜力。以常规剂量联合使用几种抗组胺药很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutics of urticaria: Results from a hospital-based multicenter study in China
Background: Therapeutics of urticaria in Chinese outpatients remain to be illustrated.Objectives: To investigate clinical treatment of outpatients with urticaria, and provide real-world evidence for selection of medication regimens.Methods: In this hospital-based multicenter study, urticaria outpatients filled in a questionnaire at initial visit and were followed-up (once per week, for 4 weeks).Results: We recruited 1715 urticaria outpatients and 647 completed 4 week’s follow-up. Their total UAS7 was reduced (27.44 at baseline, 16.87 in 1 week, 12.39 in 2 weeks, 7.21 in 3 weeks, 4.2 in 4 weeks). 71.8% patients recovered from urticaria (therapy was highly effective in 11%, whereas effective in 14.2%). The second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) (at conventional dose) were the most commonly prescribed drugs, with ebastine, levocetirizine and olopatadine being the leading ones (41.1%, 36.2%, and 16%, respectively). Combinations of several antihistamines (649 cases, 37.8%) at conventional dose were far more common than a single drug at escalated dose (59 cases, 3.4%). The combination of ebastine with levocetirizine was the most frequent options (18.25%, 313 cases), followed by combination of ebastine with compound glycyrrhizin (18.2%, 312 cases). The usage rates of tripterygium glycoside (19.6%), hydroxychloroquine (17.2%) and system application glucocorticoids (5.5%) in angioedema were much higher than in symptomatic dermographism and chronic spontaneous urticaria.Conclusions: This study identifies curative therapy for Chinese outpatients with urticaria. The sgAHs, especially ebastine, are the most commonly prescribed drugs. Olopatadine has fast-acting and curative effects. Compound glycyrrhizin holds potential as a versatile collaborator. Combinations of several antihistamines at conventional dose is common.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Inflammation
European Journal of Inflammation Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: European Journal of Inflammation is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering a wide range of topics in inflammation, including immunology, pathology, pharmacology and related general experimental and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信