增加行为健康护理的可及性:两个美国政府医疗系统的任务转移实例。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Kathryn E Kanzler, Mark E Kunik, Chase A Aycock
{"title":"增加行为健康护理的可及性:两个美国政府医疗系统的任务转移实例。","authors":"Kathryn E Kanzler, Mark E Kunik, Chase A Aycock","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing U.S. health disparities in behavioral health care requires innovative solutions to expand access beyond the traditional specialty behavioral health (BH) service model. One evidence-based strategy to increase access is task shifting, whereby tasks usually reserved for licensed clinicians are delegated to less specialized but uniquely capable health workers. Health care systems in the United States have been slow to adopt this approach, despite the widespread success of task shifting in other countries. However, two large government health care systems have employed unique task-shifting models for decades, integrating nonclinician health workers into BH settings: the Defense Health Agency (behavioral health technicians) and the Veterans Health Administration (peer specialists).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This conceptual article provides overviews of these successful approaches. Challenges and opportunities, and the potential for other U.S. health care systems to adopt task shifting for behavioral health care with paraprofessionals such as community health workers (CHWs), are discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHWs and other paraprofessionals are ideally situated to increase access to behavioral health care, but barriers must be overcome. Recommendations are provided based on lessons from these federal system approaches to task shifting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding task-shifting paradigms as the Defense Health Agency and Veterans Health Administration have done may be vital to reaching more people who could benefit from BH intervention and prevention strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing access to behavioral health care: Examples of task shifting in two U.S. government health care systems.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn E Kanzler, Mark E Kunik, Chase A Aycock\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing U.S. health disparities in behavioral health care requires innovative solutions to expand access beyond the traditional specialty behavioral health (BH) service model. One evidence-based strategy to increase access is task shifting, whereby tasks usually reserved for licensed clinicians are delegated to less specialized but uniquely capable health workers. Health care systems in the United States have been slow to adopt this approach, despite the widespread success of task shifting in other countries. However, two large government health care systems have employed unique task-shifting models for decades, integrating nonclinician health workers into BH settings: the Defense Health Agency (behavioral health technicians) and the Veterans Health Administration (peer specialists).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This conceptual article provides overviews of these successful approaches. Challenges and opportunities, and the potential for other U.S. health care systems to adopt task shifting for behavioral health care with paraprofessionals such as community health workers (CHWs), are discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CHWs and other paraprofessionals are ideally situated to increase access to behavioral health care, but barriers must be overcome. Recommendations are provided based on lessons from these federal system approaches to task shifting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding task-shifting paradigms as the Defense Health Agency and Veterans Health Administration have done may be vital to reaching more people who could benefit from BH intervention and prevention strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000886\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:要解决美国在行为健康护理方面的健康差异问题,就必须采取创新的解决方案,在传统的专科行为健康(BH)服务模式之外扩大服务范围。任务转移(task shifting)是一种以证据为基础的提高可及性的策略,即把通常由执业临床医生承担的任务委托给专业性不强但能力独特的卫生工作者。尽管任务转移在其他国家取得了广泛的成功,但美国的医疗保健系统在采用这种方法方面进展缓慢。不过,有两个大型政府医疗保健系统几十年来一直采用独特的任务转移模式,将非执业医师的医疗工作者纳入到基本医疗机构中:国防卫生局(行为健康技术人员)和退伍军人健康管理局(同伴专家):这篇概念性文章概述了这些成功的方法。方法:这篇概念性文章概述了这些成功的方法,并讨论了挑战和机遇,以及美国其他医疗保健系统采用任务转移的方式,由社区保健员(CHWs)等辅助专业人员提供行为保健服务的可能性:结果:社区保健员和其他辅助专业人员是增加行为保健服务的理想人选,但必须克服障碍。根据这些联邦系统任务转移方法的经验教训提出了建议:讨论:像国防卫生局和退伍军人卫生管理局所做的那样,扩大任务转移范例可能对帮助更多可以从行为健康干预和预防策略中受益的人至关重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing access to behavioral health care: Examples of task shifting in two U.S. government health care systems.

Introduction: Addressing U.S. health disparities in behavioral health care requires innovative solutions to expand access beyond the traditional specialty behavioral health (BH) service model. One evidence-based strategy to increase access is task shifting, whereby tasks usually reserved for licensed clinicians are delegated to less specialized but uniquely capable health workers. Health care systems in the United States have been slow to adopt this approach, despite the widespread success of task shifting in other countries. However, two large government health care systems have employed unique task-shifting models for decades, integrating nonclinician health workers into BH settings: the Defense Health Agency (behavioral health technicians) and the Veterans Health Administration (peer specialists).

Method: This conceptual article provides overviews of these successful approaches. Challenges and opportunities, and the potential for other U.S. health care systems to adopt task shifting for behavioral health care with paraprofessionals such as community health workers (CHWs), are discussed.

Results: CHWs and other paraprofessionals are ideally situated to increase access to behavioral health care, but barriers must be overcome. Recommendations are provided based on lessons from these federal system approaches to task shifting.

Discussion: Expanding task-shifting paradigms as the Defense Health Agency and Veterans Health Administration have done may be vital to reaching more people who could benefit from BH intervention and prevention strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信