{"title":"后踝骨骨折最佳手术固定的启示。","authors":"Yu-Cheng Su, Ying-Yu Wang, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chih-Wei Chang, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chien-An Shih","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 3","pages":"227-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into optimal surgical fixation for posterior malleolar fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Cheng Su, Ying-Yu Wang, Ching-Ju Fang, Yu-Kang Tu, Chih-Wei Chang, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Kai-Lan Hsu, Chien-An Shih\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"227-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0133.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:后踝骨折是一种常见的踝关节创伤,其最佳治疗方法对于改善预后至关重要。然而,关于最有效的手术方法,尤其是螺钉和钢板固定方法之间的差异,仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨这些固定技术在治疗效果上的差异:我们对比较前后(A-P)螺钉、后前(P-A)螺钉和钢板固定的临床试验进行了全面回顾。两名研究人员对来自多个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Web of Science)的数据进行了验证。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们使用视觉模拟量表和美国骨科足踝评分(AOFAS)作为主要结果进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)。次要结果包括活动范围限制、放射学结果和并发症发生率:结果:NMA 包括 13 项研究,其中包括 4 项随机试验和 8 项回顾性试验。根据基于累积排名曲线的表面排名,A-P螺钉在AOFAS改善率方面排名最高,在感染和腓肠神经损伤发生率方面排名最低。而 P-A 螺钉在改善 VAS 评分方面表现突出。相反,后托板固定在骨关节炎分级进展、术后关节台阶脱位≥2 mm、非关节挛缩和踝关节外展度丧失≥5°方面的发生率最低,但在大多数其他临床结果方面表现不佳:NMA表明,开放式钢板固定更有可能提供更好的放射学结果,而螺钉固定则更有可能提供更好的功能和疼痛结果。尽管如此,临床医生仍应考虑碎片大小和骨折形态,权衡刚性生物力学固定的优势和软组织损伤的可能性,以优化治疗效果。
Insights into optimal surgical fixation for posterior malleolar fractures.
Aims: The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.
Results: The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.