氨甲环酸与催产素治疗院外环境下的原发性产后出血:系统性综述对农村实践的影响。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Megan De Silva BHlthSc (Paramedicine), Gabrielle Mizzi BHlthSc (Paramedicine), Emily Potts BHlthSc (Paramedicine), Jayden Webb BHlthSc (Paramedicine), Elizabeth Thyer PhD, Navindhra Naidoo PhD
{"title":"氨甲环酸与催产素治疗院外环境下的原发性产后出血:系统性综述对农村实践的影响。","authors":"Megan De Silva BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Gabrielle Mizzi BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Emily Potts BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Jayden Webb BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Elizabeth Thyer PhD,&nbsp;Navindhra Naidoo PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Primary postpartum haemorrhage causes approximately 25% of global maternal deaths and accounts for significant maternal morbidity. While high certainty evidence demonstrates that tranexamic acid reduces comparative blood loss in postpartum haemorrhage in hospital settings, limited data exist on the specific pharmacological management of this condition in out-of-hospital settings, and the implications for rural communities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the efficacy of oxytocin compared to tranexamic acid in women suffering postpartum haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review comparing evidence containing patients with postpartum haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital and/or rural setting, in which oxytocin/tranexamic acid were used. Outcome measures were comparative blood loss/haemorrhagic shock, the need for further interventions and maternal/neonatal morbidity/mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>No randomised control trials have been conducted in an out-of-hospital environment in relation to oxytocin/tranexamic acid. In this setting, there is no difference in outcome measures when using oxytocin compared to no intervention, or oxytocin compared to standard care. Data are lacking on the effect of tranexamic acid on the same outcome measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Rural and out-of-hospital management of postpartum haemorrhage is limited by resource availability and practitioner availability, capacity and experience. In-hospital evidence may lack transferability, therefore direct evidence on the efficacy of pharmacological management in these contexts is scant and requires redress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is no difference in blood loss, neonatal or maternal mortality or morbidity, or need for further interventions, when using oxytocin or TXA compared to no intervention, or compared to standard care, for PPH. Further studies are needed on the efficacy of these drugs, and alternate or co-drug therapies, for PPH in the out-of-hospital environment and rural clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"32 2","pages":"227-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tranexamic acid versus oxytocin for primary postpartum Haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital setting: A systematic review with implications for rural practice\",\"authors\":\"Megan De Silva BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Gabrielle Mizzi BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Emily Potts BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Jayden Webb BHlthSc (Paramedicine),&nbsp;Elizabeth Thyer PhD,&nbsp;Navindhra Naidoo PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.13103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primary postpartum haemorrhage causes approximately 25% of global maternal deaths and accounts for significant maternal morbidity. While high certainty evidence demonstrates that tranexamic acid reduces comparative blood loss in postpartum haemorrhage in hospital settings, limited data exist on the specific pharmacological management of this condition in out-of-hospital settings, and the implications for rural communities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the efficacy of oxytocin compared to tranexamic acid in women suffering postpartum haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital environment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic review comparing evidence containing patients with postpartum haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital and/or rural setting, in which oxytocin/tranexamic acid were used. Outcome measures were comparative blood loss/haemorrhagic shock, the need for further interventions and maternal/neonatal morbidity/mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>No randomised control trials have been conducted in an out-of-hospital environment in relation to oxytocin/tranexamic acid. In this setting, there is no difference in outcome measures when using oxytocin compared to no intervention, or oxytocin compared to standard care. Data are lacking on the effect of tranexamic acid on the same outcome measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rural and out-of-hospital management of postpartum haemorrhage is limited by resource availability and practitioner availability, capacity and experience. In-hospital evidence may lack transferability, therefore direct evidence on the efficacy of pharmacological management in these contexts is scant and requires redress.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is no difference in blood loss, neonatal or maternal mortality or morbidity, or need for further interventions, when using oxytocin or TXA compared to no intervention, or compared to standard care, for PPH. Further studies are needed on the efficacy of these drugs, and alternate or co-drug therapies, for PPH in the out-of-hospital environment and rural clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"227-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:原发性产后出血约占全球孕产妇死亡人数的 25%,也是孕产妇发病率的重要原因。尽管确凿证据表明,氨甲环酸可减少医院环境中产后出血的失血量,但有关院外环境中这种情况的具体药物治疗以及对农村社区的影响的数据却很有限:目的:确定催产素与氨甲环酸对医院外产后出血妇女的疗效比较:设计:一项系统性综述,比较医院外和/或农村地区产后出血患者使用催产素/氨甲环酸的证据。结果测量指标为比较失血量/失血性休克、是否需要进一步干预以及孕产妇/新生儿发病率/死亡率:没有在院外环境中进行过与催产素/氨甲环酸有关的随机对照试验。在这种情况下,使用催产素与不使用干预措施相比,或使用催产素与标准护理相比,在结果测量方面没有差异。关于氨甲环酸对相同结果指标的影响,目前还缺乏相关数据:讨论:农村和院外产后出血管理受到资源可用性、从业人员可用性、能力和经验的限制。院内证据可能缺乏可移植性,因此在这些情况下药物治疗疗效的直接证据很少,需要加以纠正:结论:在 PPH 的治疗中,使用催产素或 TXA 与不使用干预措施相比,或与标准护理相比,在失血量、新生儿或产妇死亡率或发病率或进一步干预的需求方面没有差异。在院外环境和农村临床实践中,还需要进一步研究这些药物以及替代或联合药物疗法对 PPH 的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tranexamic acid versus oxytocin for primary postpartum Haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital setting: A systematic review with implications for rural practice

Tranexamic acid versus oxytocin for primary postpartum Haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital setting: A systematic review with implications for rural practice

Introduction

Primary postpartum haemorrhage causes approximately 25% of global maternal deaths and accounts for significant maternal morbidity. While high certainty evidence demonstrates that tranexamic acid reduces comparative blood loss in postpartum haemorrhage in hospital settings, limited data exist on the specific pharmacological management of this condition in out-of-hospital settings, and the implications for rural communities.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of oxytocin compared to tranexamic acid in women suffering postpartum haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital environment.

Design

A systematic review comparing evidence containing patients with postpartum haemorrhage in the out-of-hospital and/or rural setting, in which oxytocin/tranexamic acid were used. Outcome measures were comparative blood loss/haemorrhagic shock, the need for further interventions and maternal/neonatal morbidity/mortality.

Findings

No randomised control trials have been conducted in an out-of-hospital environment in relation to oxytocin/tranexamic acid. In this setting, there is no difference in outcome measures when using oxytocin compared to no intervention, or oxytocin compared to standard care. Data are lacking on the effect of tranexamic acid on the same outcome measures.

Discussion

Rural and out-of-hospital management of postpartum haemorrhage is limited by resource availability and practitioner availability, capacity and experience. In-hospital evidence may lack transferability, therefore direct evidence on the efficacy of pharmacological management in these contexts is scant and requires redress.

Conclusion

There is no difference in blood loss, neonatal or maternal mortality or morbidity, or need for further interventions, when using oxytocin or TXA compared to no intervention, or compared to standard care, for PPH. Further studies are needed on the efficacy of these drugs, and alternate or co-drug therapies, for PPH in the out-of-hospital environment and rural clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信