N F Ebaid, K S Abdelkawy, M A Shehata, H F Salem, G Magdy, R R S Hussein, F Elbarbry
{"title":"药物遗传学对埃及乳腺癌患者多柔比星药代动力学和毒性的影响","authors":"N F Ebaid, K S Abdelkawy, M A Shehata, H F Salem, G Magdy, R R S Hussein, F Elbarbry","doi":"10.1080/00498254.2024.2330493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes (SLC22A16 and CBR1) involved in the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin (DOX) in Egyptian female patients with breast cancer.Patients administered DOX (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) for 4 cycles every 3 weeks. The peak DOX plasma concentration was measured using a validated chromatographic method. The genotyping for the selected SNPs, SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368), and CBR1 C > T (rs20572), was performed by RT-PCR. Patients were monitored for hematological and cardiac toxicities.The variant carriers of CBR1 C > T (rs20572) exhibited significantly higher DOX concentration, but no significant association to DOX-induced hematological toxicity. On the other hand, SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368) had no significant influence on DOX plasma concentration, but was significantly correlated with lower risk of neutropenia (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and leukopoenia (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.5, <i>p</i> = 0.001). DOX-related cardiotoxicity was correlated with the cumulative dose of DOX (<i>R</i> = 0.238, <i>p</i> = 0.017), but not with any of the two examined SNPs.Genetic polymorphisms in SLC22A16 and CBR1 may explain the inter-individual variations in DOX pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Using pharmacogenetic testing is important to customise drug therapy for cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23812,"journal":{"name":"Xenobiotica","volume":" ","pages":"160-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of pharmacogenetics on pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin in Egyptian breast cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"N F Ebaid, K S Abdelkawy, M A Shehata, H F Salem, G Magdy, R R S Hussein, F Elbarbry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00498254.2024.2330493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes (SLC22A16 and CBR1) involved in the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin (DOX) in Egyptian female patients with breast cancer.Patients administered DOX (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) for 4 cycles every 3 weeks. The peak DOX plasma concentration was measured using a validated chromatographic method. The genotyping for the selected SNPs, SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368), and CBR1 C > T (rs20572), was performed by RT-PCR. Patients were monitored for hematological and cardiac toxicities.The variant carriers of CBR1 C > T (rs20572) exhibited significantly higher DOX concentration, but no significant association to DOX-induced hematological toxicity. On the other hand, SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368) had no significant influence on DOX plasma concentration, but was significantly correlated with lower risk of neutropenia (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and leukopoenia (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.5, <i>p</i> = 0.001). DOX-related cardiotoxicity was correlated with the cumulative dose of DOX (<i>R</i> = 0.238, <i>p</i> = 0.017), but not with any of the two examined SNPs.Genetic polymorphisms in SLC22A16 and CBR1 may explain the inter-individual variations in DOX pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Using pharmacogenetic testing is important to customise drug therapy for cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Xenobiotica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Xenobiotica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00498254.2024.2330493\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Xenobiotica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00498254.2024.2330493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1.本研究调查了埃及女性乳腺癌患者中参与多柔比星(DOX)药代动力学和毒性的基因(SLC22A16 和 CBR1)的单核苷酸多态性的影响。 患者每 3 周服用 DOX(60 毫克/平方米)4 个周期。多柔比星血浆浓度峰值是通过有效的色谱法测定的。通过 RT-PCR 对选定的 SNPs(SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368) 和 CBR1 C > T (rs20572))进行基因分型。3. CBR1 C > T(rs20572)变异携带者的 DOX 浓度显著升高,但与 DOX 引起的血液毒性无明显关联。另一方面,SLC22A16 T > C(rs714368)对DOX血浆浓度无明显影响,但与较低的中性粒细胞减少症(OR 0.31,95% CI 0.12-0.75,p = 0.01)和白细胞减少症(OR 0.18,95% CI 0.07-0.5,p = 0.001)风险显著相关。与 DOX 相关的心脏毒性与 DOX 的累积剂量相关(R = 0.238,p = 0.017),但与所研究的两个 SNPs 都不相关。 SLC22A16 和 CBR1 的遗传多态性可能解释了 DOX 药代动力学和毒性的个体间差异。使用药物基因检测对使用蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者进行个性化药物治疗非常重要。
Effects of pharmacogenetics on pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin in Egyptian breast cancer patients.
This study investigates the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes (SLC22A16 and CBR1) involved in the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin (DOX) in Egyptian female patients with breast cancer.Patients administered DOX (60 mg/m2) for 4 cycles every 3 weeks. The peak DOX plasma concentration was measured using a validated chromatographic method. The genotyping for the selected SNPs, SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368), and CBR1 C > T (rs20572), was performed by RT-PCR. Patients were monitored for hematological and cardiac toxicities.The variant carriers of CBR1 C > T (rs20572) exhibited significantly higher DOX concentration, but no significant association to DOX-induced hematological toxicity. On the other hand, SLC22A16 T > C (rs714368) had no significant influence on DOX plasma concentration, but was significantly correlated with lower risk of neutropenia (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.75, p = 0.01) and leukopoenia (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.5, p = 0.001). DOX-related cardiotoxicity was correlated with the cumulative dose of DOX (R = 0.238, p = 0.017), but not with any of the two examined SNPs.Genetic polymorphisms in SLC22A16 and CBR1 may explain the inter-individual variations in DOX pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Using pharmacogenetic testing is important to customise drug therapy for cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.
期刊介绍:
Xenobiotica covers seven main areas, including:General Xenobiochemistry, including in vitro studies concerned with the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs, and other xenobiotics, as well as the structure, function and regulation of associated enzymesClinical Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism, covering the pharmacokinetics and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs and other xenobiotics in manAnimal Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism, covering the pharmacokinetics, and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs and other xenobiotics in animalsPharmacogenetics, defined as the identification and functional characterisation of polymorphic genes that encode xenobiotic metabolising enzymes and transporters that may result in altered enzymatic, cellular and clinical responses to xenobioticsMolecular Toxicology, concerning the mechanisms of toxicity and the study of toxicology of xenobiotics at the molecular levelXenobiotic Transporters, concerned with all aspects of the carrier proteins involved in the movement of xenobiotics into and out of cells, and their impact on pharmacokinetic behaviour in animals and manTopics in Xenobiochemistry, in the form of reviews and commentaries are primarily intended to be a critical analysis of the issue, wherein the author offers opinions on the relevance of data or of a particular experimental approach or methodology