带多向冲击保护系统的自行车头盔在斜向冲击试验中保护性能的定量分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yong Han , Hao Yang , He Wu , Di Pan , Bing-Yu Wang
{"title":"带多向冲击保护系统的自行车头盔在斜向冲击试验中保护性能的定量分析。","authors":"Yong Han ,&nbsp;Hao Yang ,&nbsp;He Wu ,&nbsp;Di Pan ,&nbsp;Bing-Yu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The current study aimed to assess the protective performance of helmets equipped with multi-directional impact protection system (MIPS) under various oblique impact loads.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Initially, a finite element model of a bicycle helmet with MIPS was developed based on the scanned geometric parameters of an actual bicycle helmet. Subsequently, the validity of model was confirmed using the KASK WG11 oblique impact test method. Three different impact angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) and 2 varying impact speeds (5 m/s and 8 m/s) were employed in oblique tests to evaluate protective performance of MIPS in helmets, focusing on injury assessment parameters such as peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak angular acceleration (PAA) of the head.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results demonstrated that in all impact simulations, both assessment parameters were lower during impact for helmets equipped with MIPS compared to those without. The PAA was consistently lower in the MIPS helmet group, whereas the difference in PLA was not significant in the no-MIPS helmet group. For instance, at an impact velocity of 8 m/s and a 30° inclined anvil, the MIPS helmet group exhibited a PAA of 3225 rad/s<sup>2</sup> and a PLA of 281 g. In contrast, the no-MIPS helmet group displayed a PAA of 8243 rad/s<sup>2</sup> and a PLA of 292 g. Generally, both PAA and PLA parameters decreased with the increase of anvil angles. At a 60° anvil angles, PAA and PLA values were 664 rad/s<sup>2</sup> and 20.7 g, respectively, reaching their minimum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings indicated that helmets incorporating MIPS offer enhanced protection against various oblique impact loads. When assessing helmets for oblique impacts, the utilization of larger angle anvils and rear impacts might not adequately evaluate protective performance during an impact event. These findings will guide advancements in helmet design and the refinement of oblique impact test protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 4","pages":"Pages 226-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000282/pdfft?md5=787d8b5b461bf00e07af81ce12571e1b&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127524000282-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative analysis of the protective performance of bicycle helmet with multi-direction impact protection system in oblique impact tests\",\"authors\":\"Yong Han ,&nbsp;Hao Yang ,&nbsp;He Wu ,&nbsp;Di Pan ,&nbsp;Bing-Yu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The current study aimed to assess the protective performance of helmets equipped with multi-directional impact protection system (MIPS) under various oblique impact loads.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Initially, a finite element model of a bicycle helmet with MIPS was developed based on the scanned geometric parameters of an actual bicycle helmet. Subsequently, the validity of model was confirmed using the KASK WG11 oblique impact test method. Three different impact angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) and 2 varying impact speeds (5 m/s and 8 m/s) were employed in oblique tests to evaluate protective performance of MIPS in helmets, focusing on injury assessment parameters such as peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak angular acceleration (PAA) of the head.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results demonstrated that in all impact simulations, both assessment parameters were lower during impact for helmets equipped with MIPS compared to those without. The PAA was consistently lower in the MIPS helmet group, whereas the difference in PLA was not significant in the no-MIPS helmet group. For instance, at an impact velocity of 8 m/s and a 30° inclined anvil, the MIPS helmet group exhibited a PAA of 3225 rad/s<sup>2</sup> and a PLA of 281 g. In contrast, the no-MIPS helmet group displayed a PAA of 8243 rad/s<sup>2</sup> and a PLA of 292 g. Generally, both PAA and PLA parameters decreased with the increase of anvil angles. At a 60° anvil angles, PAA and PLA values were 664 rad/s<sup>2</sup> and 20.7 g, respectively, reaching their minimum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings indicated that helmets incorporating MIPS offer enhanced protection against various oblique impact loads. When assessing helmets for oblique impacts, the utilization of larger angle anvils and rear impacts might not adequately evaluate protective performance during an impact event. These findings will guide advancements in helmet design and the refinement of oblique impact test protocols.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 226-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000282/pdfft?md5=787d8b5b461bf00e07af81ce12571e1b&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127524000282-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估配备多向冲击保护系统(MIPS)的头盔在各种斜向冲击载荷下的保护性能:方法:首先,根据实际自行车头盔的几何参数扫描结果,建立了配备 MIPS 的自行车头盔的有限元模型。随后,使用 KASK WG11 斜面冲击测试方法确认了模型的有效性。在斜向试验中采用了三种不同的撞击角度(30°、45°和 60°)和两种不同的撞击速度(5 米/秒和 8 米/秒)来评估头盔中 MIPS 的防护性能,重点是头部的峰值线性加速度(PLA)和峰值角加速度(PAA)等伤害评估参数:结果表明,在所有撞击模拟中,配备 MIPS 的头盔与未配备 MIPS 的头盔相比,在撞击过程中的两个评估参数都较低。MIPS头盔组的PAA一直较低,而无MIPS头盔组的PLA差异不大。例如,在撞击速度为 8 米/秒、铁砧倾斜 30°的情况下,MIPS 头盔组的 PAA 为 3225 拉德/秒2,PLA 为 281 克。在砧角为 60° 时,PAA 和 PLA 值分别为 664 rad/s2 和 20.7 g,达到最小值:研究结果表明,采用 MIPS 技术的头盔可增强对各种斜撞击负荷的保护。在评估头盔的斜向撞击时,使用较大角度的砧板和后部撞击可能无法充分评估撞击事件中的保护性能。这些发现将为头盔设计的进步和斜撞击测试协议的完善提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative analysis of the protective performance of bicycle helmet with multi-direction impact protection system in oblique impact tests

Purpose

The current study aimed to assess the protective performance of helmets equipped with multi-directional impact protection system (MIPS) under various oblique impact loads.

Methods

Initially, a finite element model of a bicycle helmet with MIPS was developed based on the scanned geometric parameters of an actual bicycle helmet. Subsequently, the validity of model was confirmed using the KASK WG11 oblique impact test method. Three different impact angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) and 2 varying impact speeds (5 m/s and 8 m/s) were employed in oblique tests to evaluate protective performance of MIPS in helmets, focusing on injury assessment parameters such as peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak angular acceleration (PAA) of the head.

Results

The results demonstrated that in all impact simulations, both assessment parameters were lower during impact for helmets equipped with MIPS compared to those without. The PAA was consistently lower in the MIPS helmet group, whereas the difference in PLA was not significant in the no-MIPS helmet group. For instance, at an impact velocity of 8 m/s and a 30° inclined anvil, the MIPS helmet group exhibited a PAA of 3225 rad/s2 and a PLA of 281 g. In contrast, the no-MIPS helmet group displayed a PAA of 8243 rad/s2 and a PLA of 292 g. Generally, both PAA and PLA parameters decreased with the increase of anvil angles. At a 60° anvil angles, PAA and PLA values were 664 rad/s2 and 20.7 g, respectively, reaching their minimum.

Conclusion

The findings indicated that helmets incorporating MIPS offer enhanced protection against various oblique impact loads. When assessing helmets for oblique impacts, the utilization of larger angle anvils and rear impacts might not adequately evaluate protective performance during an impact event. These findings will guide advancements in helmet design and the refinement of oblique impact test protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信