数字取证分析工具的抽象模型--系统性错误缓解分析的基础

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Christopher Hargreaves , Alex Nelson , Eoghan Casey
{"title":"数字取证分析工具的抽象模型--系统性错误缓解分析的基础","authors":"Christopher Hargreaves ,&nbsp;Alex Nelson ,&nbsp;Eoghan Casey","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As automation within digital forensic tools becomes more advanced there is a need for a systematic approach to ensure the validity, reliability, and standardization of digital forensic results. This paper argues for intermediate output in a standardized format within digital forensic tools to allow a methodical approach to tool validation that targets errors at each stage of processing. To achieve this, a detailed process model of digital forensic analysis tools is created, extrapolating the details of the internal processes performed by monolithic forensic tools. The research deconstructs the process flow within tools and presents an ‘abstract digital forensic tool’, revisiting earlier abstraction layer ideas. This not only identifies the interconnected processes within tools but allows discussion of the potential error that could be introduced at each stage, and how it could potentially propagate within a tool. A demonstration, with a dataset, is also included, structurally annotated using Cyber-investigation Analysis Standard Expression (CASE).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281723001981/pdfft?md5=525c9cdc52e8d92ec005cd51f4e65163&pid=1-s2.0-S2666281723001981-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An abstract model for digital forensic analysis tools - A foundation for systematic error mitigation analysis\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Hargreaves ,&nbsp;Alex Nelson ,&nbsp;Eoghan Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As automation within digital forensic tools becomes more advanced there is a need for a systematic approach to ensure the validity, reliability, and standardization of digital forensic results. This paper argues for intermediate output in a standardized format within digital forensic tools to allow a methodical approach to tool validation that targets errors at each stage of processing. To achieve this, a detailed process model of digital forensic analysis tools is created, extrapolating the details of the internal processes performed by monolithic forensic tools. The research deconstructs the process flow within tools and presents an ‘abstract digital forensic tool’, revisiting earlier abstraction layer ideas. This not only identifies the interconnected processes within tools but allows discussion of the potential error that could be introduced at each stage, and how it could potentially propagate within a tool. A demonstration, with a dataset, is also included, structurally annotated using Cyber-investigation Analysis Standard Expression (CASE).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281723001981/pdfft?md5=525c9cdc52e8d92ec005cd51f4e65163&pid=1-s2.0-S2666281723001981-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281723001981\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281723001981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着数字取证工具的自动化越来越先进,需要一种系统的方法来确保数字取证结果的有效性、可靠性和标准化。本文认为,数字取证工具应采用标准化格式的中间输出,以便有条不紊地对工具进行验证,在处理的每个阶段找出错误。为实现这一目标,本文创建了数字取证分析工具的详细流程模型,并推断了单片式取证工具执行的内部流程细节。研究解构了工具内部的流程,提出了 "抽象数字取证工具",重温了早期的抽象层理念。这不仅能识别工具内部相互关联的流程,还能讨论每个阶段可能引入的潜在错误,以及错误如何在工具内部传播。此外,还包括一个数据集演示,并使用网络调查分析标准表达式(CASE)进行结构注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An abstract model for digital forensic analysis tools - A foundation for systematic error mitigation analysis

As automation within digital forensic tools becomes more advanced there is a need for a systematic approach to ensure the validity, reliability, and standardization of digital forensic results. This paper argues for intermediate output in a standardized format within digital forensic tools to allow a methodical approach to tool validation that targets errors at each stage of processing. To achieve this, a detailed process model of digital forensic analysis tools is created, extrapolating the details of the internal processes performed by monolithic forensic tools. The research deconstructs the process flow within tools and presents an ‘abstract digital forensic tool’, revisiting earlier abstraction layer ideas. This not only identifies the interconnected processes within tools but allows discussion of the potential error that could be introduced at each stage, and how it could potentially propagate within a tool. A demonstration, with a dataset, is also included, structurally annotated using Cyber-investigation Analysis Standard Expression (CASE).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信