不文明、聚众闹事和滥用监督:三方量表开发研究。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881
H Canan Sümer, Aslı Göncü-Köse, Yonca Toker-Gültaş, F Pınar Acar, Derya Karanfil, A Başak Ok
{"title":"不文明、聚众闹事和滥用监督:三方量表开发研究。","authors":"H Canan Sümer, Aslı Göncü-Köse, Yonca Toker-Gültaş, F Pınar Acar, Derya Karanfil, A Başak Ok","doi":"10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Türkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (<i>N</i> = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (<i>N</i> = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (<i>N</i> range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (<i>N</i> = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales' ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study.\",\"authors\":\"H Canan Sümer, Aslı Göncü-Köse, Yonca Toker-Gültaş, F Pınar Acar, Derya Karanfil, A Başak Ok\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Türkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (<i>N</i> = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (<i>N</i> = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (<i>N</i> range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (<i>N</i> = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales' ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用定性和定量的方法,在连续三项针对受雇样本的研究中,开发了针对工作场所不文明行为、聚众滋扰和虐待性监督的量表,以适应非西方环境(即土耳其)的细微差别。在研究 1 中,我们首先进行了 15 次焦点小组讨论(N = 149),确定了重点虐待类型背后的文化特异性和普遍性主题,并编制了初始量表。然后,我们进行了试点测试(N = 427),并使用探索性因素分析程序对量表进行了改进。在研究 2 中,确认性因素分析(N 范围 = 456-524)以及新量表与其广泛使用的对应量表(N = 353)之间的关联证明了量表的构建有效性。研究 2 还开发了相对较长的不文明和滥用监督量表的简表。在研究 3(N = 482)中,我们首先考察了三个量表在操作上的区别程度。其次,我们检验了量表预测职业倦怠和组织承诺的能力。结果表明,这三个量表在操作上是不同的,并且具有标准相关效度。优势分析表明,三个量表在解释两个结果变量方面的作用相当,这进一步证明了它们的独特性。我们认为,本量表的使用不一定局限于土耳其的情况,在其他新传统的情况下可能会更广泛地发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study.

Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Türkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (N = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (N = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (N range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (N = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (N = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales' ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信