{"title":"移民的被迫感和危险感:为接收国移民编制和验证问卷","authors":"Lena Niemann , Guido Hertel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A successful integration of refugees is a key challenge for many receiving countries. Existing research advocates refugees’ levels of experienced migration forcedness and associated perils as a key factor in this process. However, a standardized measure for these experiences is yet lacking. We introduce the PMF-Mig, a new questionnaire that captures migrants’ experiences of migration forcedness and associated perils after arrival in the receiving country. Based on theoretical considerations and a qualitative interview study with <em>N</em> = 22 migrants (68% male, 32% female; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 33.73, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 5.91), we developed an initial set of 14 items, which was further validated in an online study with <em>N</em> = 244 migrants (52% male, 47% female, 1% no information; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 37.37, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 9.16). A confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized fourdimensional factor structure, i.e., locus of causality, options for choice, pre-migration perils, and migration perils. In addition, results provided evidence for the reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and sensitivity of the PMF-Mig. Overall, results support the PMF-Mig as a psychometrically sound measure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived forcedness and perils of migration: Development and validation of a questionnaire for migrants in receiving countries\",\"authors\":\"Lena Niemann , Guido Hertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A successful integration of refugees is a key challenge for many receiving countries. Existing research advocates refugees’ levels of experienced migration forcedness and associated perils as a key factor in this process. However, a standardized measure for these experiences is yet lacking. We introduce the PMF-Mig, a new questionnaire that captures migrants’ experiences of migration forcedness and associated perils after arrival in the receiving country. Based on theoretical considerations and a qualitative interview study with <em>N</em> = 22 migrants (68% male, 32% female; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 33.73, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 5.91), we developed an initial set of 14 items, which was further validated in an online study with <em>N</em> = 244 migrants (52% male, 47% female, 1% no information; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 37.37, <em>SD</em><sub>age</sub> = 9.16). A confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized fourdimensional factor structure, i.e., locus of causality, options for choice, pre-migration perils, and migration perils. In addition, results provided evidence for the reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and sensitivity of the PMF-Mig. Overall, results support the PMF-Mig as a psychometrically sound measure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000208\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived forcedness and perils of migration: Development and validation of a questionnaire for migrants in receiving countries
A successful integration of refugees is a key challenge for many receiving countries. Existing research advocates refugees’ levels of experienced migration forcedness and associated perils as a key factor in this process. However, a standardized measure for these experiences is yet lacking. We introduce the PMF-Mig, a new questionnaire that captures migrants’ experiences of migration forcedness and associated perils after arrival in the receiving country. Based on theoretical considerations and a qualitative interview study with N = 22 migrants (68% male, 32% female; Mage = 33.73, SDage = 5.91), we developed an initial set of 14 items, which was further validated in an online study with N = 244 migrants (52% male, 47% female, 1% no information; Mage = 37.37, SDage = 9.16). A confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized fourdimensional factor structure, i.e., locus of causality, options for choice, pre-migration perils, and migration perils. In addition, results provided evidence for the reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and sensitivity of the PMF-Mig. Overall, results support the PMF-Mig as a psychometrically sound measure.
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.