从牙根充填并伴有根周病变的牙齿中分离出的溶血性粪肠球菌的流行率和毒力因素:泰国实验室调查。

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kewalin Thammasitboon, Rawee Teanpaisan, Nuntiya Pahumunto
{"title":"从牙根充填并伴有根周病变的牙齿中分离出的溶血性粪肠球菌的流行率和毒力因素:泰国实验室调查。","authors":"Kewalin Thammasitboon,&nbsp;Rawee Teanpaisan,&nbsp;Nuntiya Pahumunto","doi":"10.1111/iej.14059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Previous endodontic research has provided limited understanding of the prevalence and roles of haemolytic and non-haemolytic <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> strains in root filled teeth. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of these strains in root filled teeth with periradicular lesions and investigate their associated virulence factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 36 root canal samples were collected from 36 subjects. The prevalence of <i>E. faecalis</i> was determined using culture and PCR methods. Antibiotic susceptibility of haemolytic and non-haemolytic <i>E. faecalis</i> strains was assessed using the broth dilution assay. The cytokine stimulation in periodontal ligament (PDL) cells and neutrophil migration were evaluated using real-time PCR and migration assay, respectively. Cell invasion ability of the strains was assessed using a cell culture model. Additionally, the virulence gene expression of the haemolytic and non-haemolytic strains was investigated using real-time PCR. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> and Spearman's <i>ρ</i> tests were used to examine the significant difference between the two strains and to analyse the correlation between phenotype and gene expression, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p><i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> was detected in 33.3% and 88.9% of samples by culture and real-time PCR, respectively. Haemolytic strains were found in 36.4% of subjects. Non-haemolytic strains exhibited susceptibility to erythromycin and varying susceptibility to tetracycline, while all haemolytic strains were resistant to both antibiotics. Haemolytic strains significantly upregulated the expression of IL-8, OPG and RANKL in PDL cells (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). Notably, the fold increases in these genes were higher: IL-8 (556.1 ± 82.9 vs. 249.6 ± 81.8), OPG (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2) and RANKL (1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.2 ± 0.1). Furthermore, haemolytic strains had a greater effect on neutrophil migration (68.7 ± 15.2% vs. 46.9 ± 11.4%) and demonstrated a higher level of internalization into oral keratinocyte cells (68.6 ± 0.4% vs. 33.8 ± 0.5%) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). They also showed enhanced expression of virulence genes associated with haemolysin, surface proteins, collagen-binding and aggregation substances. Gelatinase activity was only detectable in non-haemolytic strains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed that haemolytic strains <i>E. faecalis</i> possessed enhanced abilities in host invasion and a higher abundance of virulence factors, suggesting their potential contribution to more severe disease manifestations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and virulence factors of haemolytic Enterococcus faecalis isolated from root filled teeth associated with periradicular lesions: A laboratory investigation in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Kewalin Thammasitboon,&nbsp;Rawee Teanpaisan,&nbsp;Nuntiya Pahumunto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.14059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Previous endodontic research has provided limited understanding of the prevalence and roles of haemolytic and non-haemolytic <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> strains in root filled teeth. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of these strains in root filled teeth with periradicular lesions and investigate their associated virulence factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 36 root canal samples were collected from 36 subjects. The prevalence of <i>E. faecalis</i> was determined using culture and PCR methods. Antibiotic susceptibility of haemolytic and non-haemolytic <i>E. faecalis</i> strains was assessed using the broth dilution assay. The cytokine stimulation in periodontal ligament (PDL) cells and neutrophil migration were evaluated using real-time PCR and migration assay, respectively. Cell invasion ability of the strains was assessed using a cell culture model. Additionally, the virulence gene expression of the haemolytic and non-haemolytic strains was investigated using real-time PCR. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> and Spearman's <i>ρ</i> tests were used to examine the significant difference between the two strains and to analyse the correlation between phenotype and gene expression, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> was detected in 33.3% and 88.9% of samples by culture and real-time PCR, respectively. Haemolytic strains were found in 36.4% of subjects. Non-haemolytic strains exhibited susceptibility to erythromycin and varying susceptibility to tetracycline, while all haemolytic strains were resistant to both antibiotics. Haemolytic strains significantly upregulated the expression of IL-8, OPG and RANKL in PDL cells (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). Notably, the fold increases in these genes were higher: IL-8 (556.1 ± 82.9 vs. 249.6 ± 81.8), OPG (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2) and RANKL (1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.2 ± 0.1). Furthermore, haemolytic strains had a greater effect on neutrophil migration (68.7 ± 15.2% vs. 46.9 ± 11.4%) and demonstrated a higher level of internalization into oral keratinocyte cells (68.6 ± 0.4% vs. 33.8 ± 0.5%) (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). They also showed enhanced expression of virulence genes associated with haemolysin, surface proteins, collagen-binding and aggregation substances. Gelatinase activity was only detectable in non-haemolytic strains.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study revealed that haemolytic strains <i>E. faecalis</i> possessed enhanced abilities in host invasion and a higher abundance of virulence factors, suggesting their potential contribution to more severe disease manifestations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.14059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以往的牙髓病学研究对溶血性和非溶血性粪肠球菌菌株在根充牙中的流行情况和作用了解有限。本研究旨在确定这些菌株在根充牙根周病变中的流行率,并调查其相关的致病因素:方法:共收集了 36 名受试者的 36 份根管样本。方法:共收集了 36 名受试者的 36 份根管样本,采用培养和 PCR 方法确定了粪大肠杆菌的流行率。采用肉汤稀释法评估溶血性和非溶血性粪大肠杆菌菌株的抗生素敏感性。实时 PCR 和迁移试验分别评估了细胞因子对牙周韧带(PDL)细胞的刺激作用和中性粒细胞的迁移。使用细胞培养模型评估了菌株的细胞侵袭能力。此外,还利用实时 PCR 技术研究了溶血菌株和非溶血菌株的毒力基因表达。曼-惠特尼 U 检验和斯皮尔曼 ρ 检验分别用于检验两种菌株之间的显著差异,以及分析表型和基因表达之间的相关性:结果:通过培养和实时 PCR 检测,分别有 33.3% 和 88.9% 的样本检出了粪肠球菌。在 36.4% 的受试者中发现了溶血性菌株。非溶血性菌株对红霉素有敏感性,对四环素也有不同程度的敏感性,而所有溶血性菌株对这两种抗生素都有耐药性。溶血菌株能明显上调 PDL 细胞中 IL-8、OPG 和 RANKL 的表达(p 结论:溶血菌株能明显上调 PDL 细胞中 IL-8、OPG 和 RANKL 的表达:本研究发现,溶血性菌株具有更强的宿主侵袭能力和更丰富的毒力因子,这表明它们可能会导致更严重的疾病表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and virulence factors of haemolytic Enterococcus faecalis isolated from root filled teeth associated with periradicular lesions: A laboratory investigation in Thailand

Aim

Previous endodontic research has provided limited understanding of the prevalence and roles of haemolytic and non-haemolytic Enterococcus faecalis strains in root filled teeth. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of these strains in root filled teeth with periradicular lesions and investigate their associated virulence factors.

Methodology

A total of 36 root canal samples were collected from 36 subjects. The prevalence of E. faecalis was determined using culture and PCR methods. Antibiotic susceptibility of haemolytic and non-haemolytic E. faecalis strains was assessed using the broth dilution assay. The cytokine stimulation in periodontal ligament (PDL) cells and neutrophil migration were evaluated using real-time PCR and migration assay, respectively. Cell invasion ability of the strains was assessed using a cell culture model. Additionally, the virulence gene expression of the haemolytic and non-haemolytic strains was investigated using real-time PCR. The Mann–Whitney U and Spearman's ρ tests were used to examine the significant difference between the two strains and to analyse the correlation between phenotype and gene expression, respectively.

Results

Enterococcus faecalis was detected in 33.3% and 88.9% of samples by culture and real-time PCR, respectively. Haemolytic strains were found in 36.4% of subjects. Non-haemolytic strains exhibited susceptibility to erythromycin and varying susceptibility to tetracycline, while all haemolytic strains were resistant to both antibiotics. Haemolytic strains significantly upregulated the expression of IL-8, OPG and RANKL in PDL cells (p < .05). Notably, the fold increases in these genes were higher: IL-8 (556.1 ± 82.9 vs. 249.6 ± 81.8), OPG (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2) and RANKL (1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.2 ± 0.1). Furthermore, haemolytic strains had a greater effect on neutrophil migration (68.7 ± 15.2% vs. 46.9 ± 11.4%) and demonstrated a higher level of internalization into oral keratinocyte cells (68.6 ± 0.4% vs. 33.8 ± 0.5%) (p < .05). They also showed enhanced expression of virulence genes associated with haemolysin, surface proteins, collagen-binding and aggregation substances. Gelatinase activity was only detectable in non-haemolytic strains.

Conclusions

This study revealed that haemolytic strains E. faecalis possessed enhanced abilities in host invasion and a higher abundance of virulence factors, suggesting their potential contribution to more severe disease manifestations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信