Quitterie Fontanges, Paul Dubos, Tom Lesluyes, Yec'han Laizet, Valérie Velasco, Bárbara Meléndez, Nicky D'Haene, Esther Oliva, Robert H. Young, Laetitia Mayeur, Flora Rebier, Mélissa Alamé, Claire Larmonier, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Laurent Arnould, Isabelle Soubeyran, Camille Chakiba, Anne Floquet, Guillaume Babin, Frédéric Guyon, Eliane Mery, Sophie Le Guellec, Jean-Christophe Noël, Sabrina Croce, Frédéric Chibon
{"title":"奇异核的子宫肌瘤和富马酸水合酶缺乏性子宫肌瘤的基因组图谱分析:阵列-CGH解读的优势、劣势和局限性。","authors":"Quitterie Fontanges, Paul Dubos, Tom Lesluyes, Yec'han Laizet, Valérie Velasco, Bárbara Meléndez, Nicky D'Haene, Esther Oliva, Robert H. Young, Laetitia Mayeur, Flora Rebier, Mélissa Alamé, Claire Larmonier, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Laurent Arnould, Isabelle Soubeyran, Camille Chakiba, Anne Floquet, Guillaume Babin, Frédéric Guyon, Eliane Mery, Sophie Le Guellec, Jean-Christophe Noël, Sabrina Croce, Frédéric Chibon","doi":"10.1002/gcc.23229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A close relationship has been demonstrated between genomic complexity and clinical outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumors. We studied the genomic profiles by array-CGH of 28 fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas and 37 leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LMBN) from 64 patients. Follow-up was available for 46 patients (from three to 249 months, mean 87.3 months). All patients were alive without evidence of disease. For 51 array-CGH interpretable tumors the mean Genomic Index (GI) was 16.4 (median: 9.8; from 1 to 57.8), significantly lower than the mean GI in LMS (mean GI 51.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). We described three groups: (1) a group with <i>FH</i> deletion (24/58) with low GI (mean GI: 11 vs. 22,4, <i>p</i> = 0.02), (2) a group with <i>TP53</i> deletion (17/58) with higher GI (22.4 vs. 11 <i>p</i> = 0.02), and (3) a group without genomic events on <i>FH</i> or <i>TP53</i> genes (17/58) (mean GI:18.3; from 1 to 57.8). Because none of these tumors recurred and none showed morphological features of LMS we concluded that GI at the cut-off of 10 was not applicable in these subtypes of LM. By integration of all those findings, a GI <10 in LMBN remains a valuable argument for benignity. Conversely, in LMBN a GI >10 or alteration in tumor suppressor genes, should not alone warrant a diagnosis of malignancy. Nine tumors were tested with Nanocind CINSARC<b>®</b> signature and all were classified in low risk of recurrence. We propose, based on our observations, a diagnostic approach of these challenging lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12700,"journal":{"name":"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic profile analysis of leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei and fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas: Strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of array-CGH interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Quitterie Fontanges, Paul Dubos, Tom Lesluyes, Yec'han Laizet, Valérie Velasco, Bárbara Meléndez, Nicky D'Haene, Esther Oliva, Robert H. Young, Laetitia Mayeur, Flora Rebier, Mélissa Alamé, Claire Larmonier, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Laurent Arnould, Isabelle Soubeyran, Camille Chakiba, Anne Floquet, Guillaume Babin, Frédéric Guyon, Eliane Mery, Sophie Le Guellec, Jean-Christophe Noël, Sabrina Croce, Frédéric Chibon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gcc.23229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A close relationship has been demonstrated between genomic complexity and clinical outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumors. We studied the genomic profiles by array-CGH of 28 fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas and 37 leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LMBN) from 64 patients. Follow-up was available for 46 patients (from three to 249 months, mean 87.3 months). All patients were alive without evidence of disease. For 51 array-CGH interpretable tumors the mean Genomic Index (GI) was 16.4 (median: 9.8; from 1 to 57.8), significantly lower than the mean GI in LMS (mean GI 51.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001). We described three groups: (1) a group with <i>FH</i> deletion (24/58) with low GI (mean GI: 11 vs. 22,4, <i>p</i> = 0.02), (2) a group with <i>TP53</i> deletion (17/58) with higher GI (22.4 vs. 11 <i>p</i> = 0.02), and (3) a group without genomic events on <i>FH</i> or <i>TP53</i> genes (17/58) (mean GI:18.3; from 1 to 57.8). Because none of these tumors recurred and none showed morphological features of LMS we concluded that GI at the cut-off of 10 was not applicable in these subtypes of LM. By integration of all those findings, a GI <10 in LMBN remains a valuable argument for benignity. Conversely, in LMBN a GI >10 or alteration in tumor suppressor genes, should not alone warrant a diagnosis of malignancy. Nine tumors were tested with Nanocind CINSARC<b>®</b> signature and all were classified in low risk of recurrence. We propose, based on our observations, a diagnostic approach of these challenging lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gcc.23229\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gcc.23229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic profile analysis of leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei and fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas: Strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of array-CGH interpretation
A close relationship has been demonstrated between genomic complexity and clinical outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumors. We studied the genomic profiles by array-CGH of 28 fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas and 37 leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LMBN) from 64 patients. Follow-up was available for 46 patients (from three to 249 months, mean 87.3 months). All patients were alive without evidence of disease. For 51 array-CGH interpretable tumors the mean Genomic Index (GI) was 16.4 (median: 9.8; from 1 to 57.8), significantly lower than the mean GI in LMS (mean GI 51.8, p < 0.001). We described three groups: (1) a group with FH deletion (24/58) with low GI (mean GI: 11 vs. 22,4, p = 0.02), (2) a group with TP53 deletion (17/58) with higher GI (22.4 vs. 11 p = 0.02), and (3) a group without genomic events on FH or TP53 genes (17/58) (mean GI:18.3; from 1 to 57.8). Because none of these tumors recurred and none showed morphological features of LMS we concluded that GI at the cut-off of 10 was not applicable in these subtypes of LM. By integration of all those findings, a GI <10 in LMBN remains a valuable argument for benignity. Conversely, in LMBN a GI >10 or alteration in tumor suppressor genes, should not alone warrant a diagnosis of malignancy. Nine tumors were tested with Nanocind CINSARC® signature and all were classified in low risk of recurrence. We propose, based on our observations, a diagnostic approach of these challenging lesions.
期刊介绍:
Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer will offer rapid publication of original full-length research articles, perspectives, reviews and letters to the editors on genetic analysis as related to the study of neoplasia. The main scope of the journal is to communicate new insights into the etiology and/or pathogenesis of neoplasia, as well as molecular and cellular findings of relevance for the management of cancer patients. While preference will be given to research utilizing analytical and functional approaches, descriptive studies and case reports will also be welcomed when they offer insights regarding basic biological mechanisms or the clinical management of neoplastic disorders.