医护人员使用氯胺酮治疗难治性癫痫状态的经验。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000582
Gabriela Tantillo, Nicole Davis, Justin Granstein, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Parul Agarwal, Kaitlin Reilly, Alexandra Reynolds, Gina Kayal, John Liang, Nathalie Jetté
{"title":"医护人员使用氯胺酮治疗难治性癫痫状态的经验。","authors":"Gabriela Tantillo, Nicole Davis, Justin Granstein, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Parul Agarwal, Kaitlin Reilly, Alexandra Reynolds, Gina Kayal, John Liang, Nathalie Jetté","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with anesthetic agents can be associated with complications including respiratory depression and hypotension. Ketamine is an emerging RSE treatment, but optimal dosing and timing are unknown. We studied provider attitudes and practices regarding the use of ketamine for RSE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review informed the creation of the survey, developed by professionals in epilepsy, pharmacy, and neurocritical care. The survey was distributed to members of the Critical Care EEG Monitoring and Research Consortium, Neurocritical Care Society, American Academy of Neurology Synapse community, American Epilepsy Society, and the Canadian League Against Epilepsy. Descriptive statistics were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 109 respondents. First-line agents for RSE were midazolam (53%), propofol (42%), pentobarbital (2%), and ketamine (1%). Reasons for ketamine use included failure of midazolam/propofol to control seizures (81%) or hypotension on another anesthetic (35%). Perceived contraindications included hypertension (37%), elevated intracranial pressure (24%), and heart failure (18%). Perceived benefits included decreased use of vasopressors (53%) and more rapid RSE control when used adjunctively (49%). Routine ketamine users often treated more than 10 RSE cases per year, worked as intensivists or at academic institutions. Of the respondents, 59% found ketamine useful for RSE and 94% were interested in learning more about its use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although most participants found ketamine helpful for RSE, it is mainly used as a second-line agent adjunctively with midazolam or propofol. Perceived ketamine benefits included decreased need for hemodynamic support and more rapid seizure control when used in conjunction with other anesthetics. Perceived contraindications centered on cardiac and intracranial pressure concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":"47 2","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider Experience With the Use of Ketamine for Refractory Status Epilepticus.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Tantillo, Nicole Davis, Justin Granstein, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Parul Agarwal, Kaitlin Reilly, Alexandra Reynolds, Gina Kayal, John Liang, Nathalie Jetté\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with anesthetic agents can be associated with complications including respiratory depression and hypotension. Ketamine is an emerging RSE treatment, but optimal dosing and timing are unknown. We studied provider attitudes and practices regarding the use of ketamine for RSE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review informed the creation of the survey, developed by professionals in epilepsy, pharmacy, and neurocritical care. The survey was distributed to members of the Critical Care EEG Monitoring and Research Consortium, Neurocritical Care Society, American Academy of Neurology Synapse community, American Epilepsy Society, and the Canadian League Against Epilepsy. Descriptive statistics were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 109 respondents. First-line agents for RSE were midazolam (53%), propofol (42%), pentobarbital (2%), and ketamine (1%). Reasons for ketamine use included failure of midazolam/propofol to control seizures (81%) or hypotension on another anesthetic (35%). Perceived contraindications included hypertension (37%), elevated intracranial pressure (24%), and heart failure (18%). Perceived benefits included decreased use of vasopressors (53%) and more rapid RSE control when used adjunctively (49%). Routine ketamine users often treated more than 10 RSE cases per year, worked as intensivists or at academic institutions. Of the respondents, 59% found ketamine useful for RSE and 94% were interested in learning more about its use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although most participants found ketamine helpful for RSE, it is mainly used as a second-line agent adjunctively with midazolam or propofol. Perceived ketamine benefits included decreased need for hemodynamic support and more rapid seizure control when used in conjunction with other anesthetics. Perceived contraindications centered on cardiac and intracranial pressure concerns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"37-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000582\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用麻醉剂治疗难治性癫痫状态(RSE)可能会出现呼吸抑制和低血压等并发症。氯胺酮是一种新兴的 RSE 治疗方法,但最佳剂量和时机尚不清楚。我们研究了医疗服务提供者对使用氯胺酮治疗 RSE 的态度和做法:调查由癫痫、药学和神经重症护理领域的专业人士进行,并通过文献综述了解了相关情况。调查表分发给了重症监护脑电图监测和研究联合会、神经重症监护学会、美国神经学会突触社区、美国癫痫学会和加拿大抗癫痫联盟的成员。调查结果共有 109 位受访者。RSE 的一线用药为咪达唑仑(53%)、异丙酚(42%)、戊巴比妥(2%)和氯胺酮(1%)。使用氯胺酮的原因包括咪达唑仑/丙泊酚未能控制癫痫发作(81%)或使用其他麻醉剂时出现低血压(35%)。认为的禁忌症包括高血压(37%)、颅内压升高(24%)和心力衰竭(18%)。所认为的好处包括减少血管加压药的使用(53%),以及在辅助使用时更快地控制 RSE(49%)。氯胺酮的常规使用者通常每年治疗超过 10 例 RSE,他们是重症监护医生或在学术机构工作。在受访者中,59% 的人认为氯胺酮对 RSE 有帮助,94% 的人有兴趣进一步了解氯胺酮的使用:尽管大多数参与者认为氯胺酮对 RSE 有帮助,但它主要是作为二线药物与咪达唑仑或异丙酚辅助使用。认为氯胺酮的益处包括减少对血液动力学支持的需求,以及在与其他麻醉剂联合使用时更快地控制癫痫发作。所认为的禁忌症主要集中在心脏和颅内压方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provider Experience With the Use of Ketamine for Refractory Status Epilepticus.

Objective: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with anesthetic agents can be associated with complications including respiratory depression and hypotension. Ketamine is an emerging RSE treatment, but optimal dosing and timing are unknown. We studied provider attitudes and practices regarding the use of ketamine for RSE.

Methods: A literature review informed the creation of the survey, developed by professionals in epilepsy, pharmacy, and neurocritical care. The survey was distributed to members of the Critical Care EEG Monitoring and Research Consortium, Neurocritical Care Society, American Academy of Neurology Synapse community, American Epilepsy Society, and the Canadian League Against Epilepsy. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

Results: There were 109 respondents. First-line agents for RSE were midazolam (53%), propofol (42%), pentobarbital (2%), and ketamine (1%). Reasons for ketamine use included failure of midazolam/propofol to control seizures (81%) or hypotension on another anesthetic (35%). Perceived contraindications included hypertension (37%), elevated intracranial pressure (24%), and heart failure (18%). Perceived benefits included decreased use of vasopressors (53%) and more rapid RSE control when used adjunctively (49%). Routine ketamine users often treated more than 10 RSE cases per year, worked as intensivists or at academic institutions. Of the respondents, 59% found ketamine useful for RSE and 94% were interested in learning more about its use.

Conclusions: Although most participants found ketamine helpful for RSE, it is mainly used as a second-line agent adjunctively with midazolam or propofol. Perceived ketamine benefits included decreased need for hemodynamic support and more rapid seizure control when used in conjunction with other anesthetics. Perceived contraindications centered on cardiac and intracranial pressure concerns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信