密歇根州阿片类药物的处方和消费与患者报告的急诊手术后经历和满意度的关系。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006264
Lindsay Rosenthal, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Jennifer Waljee, Mark Bicket, Michael Englesbe, Ryan Howard
{"title":"密歇根州阿片类药物的处方和消费与患者报告的急诊手术后经历和满意度的关系。","authors":"Lindsay Rosenthal, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Jennifer Waljee, Mark Bicket, Michael Englesbe, Ryan Howard","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationships among opioid prescribing, consumption, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing emergency surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Overprescribing of opioids for pain management after surgery has become a public health concern and a major contributor to opioid misuse and dependency. Current guidelines do not address opioid prescribing after emergency surgical procedures, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between opioid prescribing and consumption in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of the quantity of opioids prescribed and PROs in a population-based setting. The sample included adults ≥18 years undergoing emergency surgery across 69 hospitals in Michigan. Patients were included if they received a discharge opioid prescription and had valid data for opioid consumption and PROs. Surgical procedures took place between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 3742 patients underwent an emergency operation. The mean number of opioid pills prescribed was 9.6 and the mean number of opioid pills consumed was 4.6. In a 2-model with logit in the first part and a linear regression in the second, prescription size was significantly associated with both the probability of consumption (adjusted odds ratio: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04) and the amount of consumption conditional on any consumption (coefficient: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients only consumed half of the opioids they were prescribed after undergoing emergency surgery. In addition, patients who were given larger prescriptions consumed more opioids, but did not experience less pain, higher satisfaction, better quality of life, or less regret to undergo surgery. Overall, this suggests that opioids may be excessively prescribed to patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures and that larger prescriptions do not improve the patient experience after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"228-233"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Opioid Prescribing and Consumption with Patient-reported Experiences and Satisfaction After Emergency Surgery in Michigan.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Rosenthal, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Jennifer Waljee, Mark Bicket, Michael Englesbe, Ryan Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationships among opioid prescribing, consumption, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing emergency surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Overprescribing of opioids for pain management after surgery has become a public health concern and a major contributor to opioid misuse and dependency. Current guidelines do not address opioid prescribing after emergency surgical procedures, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between opioid prescribing and consumption in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of the quantity of opioids prescribed and PROs in a population-based setting. The sample included adults ≥18 years undergoing emergency surgery across 69 hospitals in Michigan. Patients were included if they received a discharge opioid prescription and had valid data for opioid consumption and PROs. Surgical procedures took place between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 3742 patients underwent an emergency operation. The mean number of opioid pills prescribed was 9.6 and the mean number of opioid pills consumed was 4.6. In a 2-model with logit in the first part and a linear regression in the second, prescription size was significantly associated with both the probability of consumption (adjusted odds ratio: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04) and the amount of consumption conditional on any consumption (coefficient: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients only consumed half of the opioids they were prescribed after undergoing emergency surgery. In addition, patients who were given larger prescriptions consumed more opioids, but did not experience less pain, higher satisfaction, better quality of life, or less regret to undergo surgery. Overall, this suggests that opioids may be excessively prescribed to patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures and that larger prescriptions do not improve the patient experience after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"228-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006264\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查急诊手术患者的阿片类药物处方、用量和患者报告结果(PROs)之间的关系:过度开具阿片类药物用于术后疼痛治疗已成为一个公共卫生问题,也是造成阿片类药物滥用和依赖的主要原因。目前的指南并未涉及急诊手术后阿片类药物的处方问题,因此了解这种情况下阿片类药物的处方与用量之间的关系就显得尤为重要:方法:对基于人群的阿片类药物处方量和患者报告结果(PROs)进行回顾性分析。样本包括密歇根州 69 家医院接受急诊手术的 18 岁及以上成年人。如果患者在出院时收到了阿片类药物处方,并且拥有阿片类药物消耗量和患者报告结果的有效数据,则将其纳入样本。手术时间为 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日:在研究期间,共有 3,742 名患者接受了急诊手术。开出的阿片类药物平均数量为 9.6 粒,消耗的阿片类药物平均数量为 4.6 粒。在第一部分为 logit、第二部分为线性回归的双模型中,处方量与消耗概率(aOR 1.02,95% CI 1.01-1.04)和消耗量(系数 0.70 95% CI 0.54-0.86)均有显著相关性:患者在接受急诊手术后仅服用了一半的阿片类药物。此外,处方量较大的患者消耗的阿片类药物也较多,但并没有减轻疼痛、提高满意度、改善生活质量或减少接受手术的遗憾。总体而言,这表明阿片类药物可能被过多地开给了接受急诊手术的患者,而且大处方并不能改善患者的术后体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Opioid Prescribing and Consumption with Patient-reported Experiences and Satisfaction After Emergency Surgery in Michigan.

Objective: To investigate the relationships among opioid prescribing, consumption, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Background: Overprescribing of opioids for pain management after surgery has become a public health concern and a major contributor to opioid misuse and dependency. Current guidelines do not address opioid prescribing after emergency surgical procedures, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between opioid prescribing and consumption in this setting.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of the quantity of opioids prescribed and PROs in a population-based setting. The sample included adults ≥18 years undergoing emergency surgery across 69 hospitals in Michigan. Patients were included if they received a discharge opioid prescription and had valid data for opioid consumption and PROs. Surgical procedures took place between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020.

Results: During the study period, a total of 3742 patients underwent an emergency operation. The mean number of opioid pills prescribed was 9.6 and the mean number of opioid pills consumed was 4.6. In a 2-model with logit in the first part and a linear regression in the second, prescription size was significantly associated with both the probability of consumption (adjusted odds ratio: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04) and the amount of consumption conditional on any consumption (coefficient: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.86).

Conclusions: Patients only consumed half of the opioids they were prescribed after undergoing emergency surgery. In addition, patients who were given larger prescriptions consumed more opioids, but did not experience less pain, higher satisfaction, better quality of life, or less regret to undergo surgery. Overall, this suggests that opioids may be excessively prescribed to patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures and that larger prescriptions do not improve the patient experience after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信