是否有可能减少单个树图中克隆评估的重复次数?

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
{"title":"是否有可能减少单个树图中克隆评估的重复次数?","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10681-024-03294-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>In clonal progenies tests, using experiments with one single tree plot, the number of repetitions (cloned plants of each individual of the progenies under evaluation) must be smaller than the traditionally employed. This is because obtaining clones of each individual from the progenies must be carried out in the shortest possible time and, thus, contribute to the greatest advantage of clonal progenies test, which is to identify new clones earlier than other selection alternatives. With the objective of obtaining the minimum number of repetitions necessary in one single tree plot for use in clonal progenies tests, without significantly affecting the selection accuracy, this work was carried out. To estimate the minimum number of repetitions (number of plants of each clone), data obtained from the evaluation of 60 eucalyptus clones, with 30 repetitions in one single tree plot, conducted in six sites, were used. In these experiments, the mean annual increment (cubic meter per hectare per year) was evaluated. Through 1000 resamplings, without replacement, experimental data were obtained with the number of repetitions ranging from 2 to 29. The estimates of the general mean, genetic variance between clones and the selection accuracy obtained showed that, the estimates of general mean, genetic variance between clones and selection accuracy in means were very similar. It was inferred that for clonal progenies tests, in which the experiments will certainly be carried out in more sites, it is feasible to use five repetitions per experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11803,"journal":{"name":"Euphytica","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Would it be possible to reduce the number of repetitions in the evaluation of clones in a single tree plot?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10681-024-03294-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>In clonal progenies tests, using experiments with one single tree plot, the number of repetitions (cloned plants of each individual of the progenies under evaluation) must be smaller than the traditionally employed. This is because obtaining clones of each individual from the progenies must be carried out in the shortest possible time and, thus, contribute to the greatest advantage of clonal progenies test, which is to identify new clones earlier than other selection alternatives. With the objective of obtaining the minimum number of repetitions necessary in one single tree plot for use in clonal progenies tests, without significantly affecting the selection accuracy, this work was carried out. To estimate the minimum number of repetitions (number of plants of each clone), data obtained from the evaluation of 60 eucalyptus clones, with 30 repetitions in one single tree plot, conducted in six sites, were used. In these experiments, the mean annual increment (cubic meter per hectare per year) was evaluated. Through 1000 resamplings, without replacement, experimental data were obtained with the number of repetitions ranging from 2 to 29. The estimates of the general mean, genetic variance between clones and the selection accuracy obtained showed that, the estimates of general mean, genetic variance between clones and selection accuracy in means were very similar. It was inferred that for clonal progenies tests, in which the experiments will certainly be carried out in more sites, it is feasible to use five repetitions per experiment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euphytica\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euphytica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03294-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euphytica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03294-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在克隆亲本试验中,使用单个树丛进行试验时,重复次数(被评价亲本中每个个体的克隆植株)必须少于传统使用的次数。这是因为必须在尽可能短的时间内从后代中获得每个个体的克隆,从而发挥克隆后代试验的最大优势,即比其他选育方法更早发现新的克隆。这项工作的目的是在不严重影响选择准确性的情况下,获得用于克隆后代测试的单个树小区所需的最少重复次数。为了估算最小重复次数(每个克隆的植株数),我们使用了在六个地点对 60 个桉树克隆进行的评估数据,这些克隆在单个树丛中重复了 30 次。在这些实验中,对年平均增量(每年每公顷立方米)进行了评估。通过 1000 次无替换的重复取样,获得了重复次数从 2 到 29 次不等的实验数据。对一般平均值、克隆间遗传变异和选择精确度的估算结果表明,一般平均值、克隆间遗传变异和选择精确度的估算结果非常接近。由此推断,在克隆后代试验中,如果肯定要在更多地点进行试验,那么每次试验重复 5 次是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Would it be possible to reduce the number of repetitions in the evaluation of clones in a single tree plot?

Abstract

In clonal progenies tests, using experiments with one single tree plot, the number of repetitions (cloned plants of each individual of the progenies under evaluation) must be smaller than the traditionally employed. This is because obtaining clones of each individual from the progenies must be carried out in the shortest possible time and, thus, contribute to the greatest advantage of clonal progenies test, which is to identify new clones earlier than other selection alternatives. With the objective of obtaining the minimum number of repetitions necessary in one single tree plot for use in clonal progenies tests, without significantly affecting the selection accuracy, this work was carried out. To estimate the minimum number of repetitions (number of plants of each clone), data obtained from the evaluation of 60 eucalyptus clones, with 30 repetitions in one single tree plot, conducted in six sites, were used. In these experiments, the mean annual increment (cubic meter per hectare per year) was evaluated. Through 1000 resamplings, without replacement, experimental data were obtained with the number of repetitions ranging from 2 to 29. The estimates of the general mean, genetic variance between clones and the selection accuracy obtained showed that, the estimates of general mean, genetic variance between clones and selection accuracy in means were very similar. It was inferred that for clonal progenies tests, in which the experiments will certainly be carried out in more sites, it is feasible to use five repetitions per experiment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Euphytica
Euphytica 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Euphytica is an international journal on theoretical and applied aspects of plant breeding. It publishes critical reviews and papers on the results of original research related to plant breeding. The integration of modern and traditional plant breeding is a growing field of research using transgenic crop plants and/or marker assisted breeding in combination with traditional breeding tools. The content should cover the interests of researchers directly or indirectly involved in plant breeding, at universities, breeding institutes, seed industries, plant biotech companies and industries using plant raw materials, and promote stability, adaptability and sustainability in agriculture and agro-industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信