Yingyou He, Yu Wang, Mohammed Qasem Al-Watary, Yumo Wang, Yifan Wu, Xiang Li, Bin Ye, Jihua Li
{"title":"L型颧骨缩小术与斜切或垂直切除术:哪一种是最佳选择?","authors":"Yingyou He, Yu Wang, Mohammed Qasem Al-Watary, Yumo Wang, Yifan Wu, Xiang Li, Bin Ye, Jihua Li","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the optimal surgical techniques in reduction malarplasty by comparing the difference between the L-shaped osteotomy with vertical and oblique bone resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients who visited the authors' department for L-shaped osteotomy with either vertical (group I) or oblique bone resection (group II) from 2015 to 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative spiral computed tomographic data were analyzed. The preoperative computed tomographic data were also used to simulate the virtual and model surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that a broken bridge-like structure with a bony gap of 2.86 ± 1.03 mm at the zygomatic arch root was observed in group I, and a mortice-and-tenon joint structure with a bone overlap of 2.28 ± 0.58 mm was formed in group II. The zygoma in group I displaced significantly in the vertical direction and horizontal direction during the follow-up. Simultaneously, the incidence of complications was higher in group I. In the mechanism analysis through virtual and model surgery, the zygomatic segment was shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in group I, and a bony gap was detected at the zygomatic arch root. Conversely, a superior and posterior movement was performed in group II and it maintained the zygomatic complex integral with bone overlap at the zygomatic arch root on repositioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggested that L-shaped osteotomy with oblique bone resection could be the optimal choice for reducing zygomatic prominence.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, III.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"26e-34e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The L-Shaped Zygomatic Reduction with Oblique or Vertical Resection: Which One Is the Optimal Choice?\",\"authors\":\"Yingyou He, Yu Wang, Mohammed Qasem Al-Watary, Yumo Wang, Yifan Wu, Xiang Li, Bin Ye, Jihua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the optimal surgical techniques in reduction malarplasty by comparing the difference between the L-shaped osteotomy with vertical and oblique bone resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients who visited the authors' department for L-shaped osteotomy with either vertical (group I) or oblique bone resection (group II) from 2015 to 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative spiral computed tomographic data were analyzed. The preoperative computed tomographic data were also used to simulate the virtual and model surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that a broken bridge-like structure with a bony gap of 2.86 ± 1.03 mm at the zygomatic arch root was observed in group I, and a mortice-and-tenon joint structure with a bone overlap of 2.28 ± 0.58 mm was formed in group II. The zygoma in group I displaced significantly in the vertical direction and horizontal direction during the follow-up. Simultaneously, the incidence of complications was higher in group I. In the mechanism analysis through virtual and model surgery, the zygomatic segment was shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in group I, and a bony gap was detected at the zygomatic arch root. Conversely, a superior and posterior movement was performed in group II and it maintained the zygomatic complex integral with bone overlap at the zygomatic arch root on repositioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggested that L-shaped osteotomy with oblique bone resection could be the optimal choice for reducing zygomatic prominence.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26e-34e\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The L-Shaped Zygomatic Reduction with Oblique or Vertical Resection: Which One Is the Optimal Choice?
Background: This study aimed to investigate the optimal surgical techniques in reduction malarplasty by comparing the difference between the L-shaped osteotomy with vertical and oblique bone resection.
Methods: A total of 120 patients who visited the authors' department for L-shaped osteotomy with either vertical (group I) or oblique bone resection (group II) from 2015 to 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative spiral computed tomographic data were analyzed. The preoperative computed tomographic data were also used to simulate the virtual and model surgery.
Results: The results showed that a broken bridge-like structure with a bony gap of 2.86 ± 1.03 mm at the zygomatic arch root was observed in group I, and a mortice-and-tenon joint structure with a bone overlap of 2.28 ± 0.58 mm was formed in group II. The zygoma in group I displaced significantly in the vertical direction and horizontal direction during the follow-up. Simultaneously, the incidence of complications was higher in group I. In the mechanism analysis through virtual and model surgery, the zygomatic segment was shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in group I, and a bony gap was detected at the zygomatic arch root. Conversely, a superior and posterior movement was performed in group II and it maintained the zygomatic complex integral with bone overlap at the zygomatic arch root on repositioning.
Conclusion: This study suggested that L-shaped osteotomy with oblique bone resection could be the optimal choice for reducing zygomatic prominence.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.