用于手术规划的深度学习重建腰椎三维 MRI:与 CT 相比的椎弓根螺钉置放和几何测量。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-08123-3
Frederik Abel, Darren R Lebl, George Gorgy, David Dalton, J Levi Chazen, Elisha Lim, Qian Li, Darryl B Sneag, Ek T Tan
{"title":"用于手术规划的深度学习重建腰椎三维 MRI:与 CT 相比的椎弓根螺钉置放和几何测量。","authors":"Frederik Abel, Darren R Lebl, George Gorgy, David Dalton, J Levi Chazen, Elisha Lim, Qian Li, Darryl B Sneag, Ek T Tan","doi":"10.1007/s00586-023-08123-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test equivalency of deep-learning 3D lumbar spine MRI with \"CT-like\" contrast to CT for virtual pedicle screw planning and geometric measurements in robotic-navigated spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2021 and June 2022, 16 patients referred for spinal fusion and decompression surgery with pre-operative CT and 3D MRI were retrospectively assessed. Pedicle screws were virtually placed on lumbar (L1-L5) and sacral (S1) vertebrae by three spine surgeons, and metrics (lateral deviation, axial/sagittal angles) were collected. Vertebral body length/width (VL/VW) and pedicle height/width (PH/PW) were measured at L1-L5 by three radiologists. Analysis included equivalency testing using the 95% confidence interval (CI), a margin of ± 1 mm (± 2.08° for angles), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all vertebral levels, both combined and separately, equivalency between CT and MRI was proven for all pedicle screw metrics and geometric measurements, except for VL at L1 (mean difference: - 0.64 mm; [95%CI - 1.05, - 0.24]), L2 (- 0.65 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.20]), and L4 (- 0.78 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.46]). Inter- and intra-rater ICC for screw metrics across all vertebral levels combined ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 and 0.89-0.98 for CT, and from 0.62 to 0.92 and 0.81-0.97 for MRI, respectively. Inter- and intra-rater ICC for geometric measurements ranged from 0.60 to 0.95 and 0.84-0.97 for CT, and 0.61-0.95 and 0.93-0.98 for MRI, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep-learning 3D MRI facilitates equivalent virtual pedicle screw placements and geometric assessments for most lumbar vertebrae, with the exception of vertebral body length at L1, L2, and L4, compared to CT for pre-operative planning in patients considered for robotic-navigated spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4144-4154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT.\",\"authors\":\"Frederik Abel, Darren R Lebl, George Gorgy, David Dalton, J Levi Chazen, Elisha Lim, Qian Li, Darryl B Sneag, Ek T Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-023-08123-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test equivalency of deep-learning 3D lumbar spine MRI with \\\"CT-like\\\" contrast to CT for virtual pedicle screw planning and geometric measurements in robotic-navigated spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2021 and June 2022, 16 patients referred for spinal fusion and decompression surgery with pre-operative CT and 3D MRI were retrospectively assessed. Pedicle screws were virtually placed on lumbar (L1-L5) and sacral (S1) vertebrae by three spine surgeons, and metrics (lateral deviation, axial/sagittal angles) were collected. Vertebral body length/width (VL/VW) and pedicle height/width (PH/PW) were measured at L1-L5 by three radiologists. Analysis included equivalency testing using the 95% confidence interval (CI), a margin of ± 1 mm (± 2.08° for angles), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all vertebral levels, both combined and separately, equivalency between CT and MRI was proven for all pedicle screw metrics and geometric measurements, except for VL at L1 (mean difference: - 0.64 mm; [95%CI - 1.05, - 0.24]), L2 (- 0.65 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.20]), and L4 (- 0.78 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.46]). Inter- and intra-rater ICC for screw metrics across all vertebral levels combined ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 and 0.89-0.98 for CT, and from 0.62 to 0.92 and 0.81-0.97 for MRI, respectively. Inter- and intra-rater ICC for geometric measurements ranged from 0.60 to 0.95 and 0.84-0.97 for CT, and 0.61-0.95 and 0.93-0.98 for MRI, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep-learning 3D MRI facilitates equivalent virtual pedicle screw placements and geometric assessments for most lumbar vertebrae, with the exception of vertebral body length at L1, L2, and L4, compared to CT for pre-operative planning in patients considered for robotic-navigated spine surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4144-4154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08123-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08123-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:测试在机器人导航脊柱手术中,具有 "类 CT "对比度的深度学习三维腰椎 MRI 与 CT 在虚拟椎弓根螺钉规划和几何测量方面的等效性:方法: 在2021年12月至2022年6月期间,对16名转诊接受脊柱融合和减压手术的患者术前CT和三维MRI进行了回顾性评估。由三位脊柱外科医生在腰椎(L1-L5)和骶椎(S1)上虚拟置入椎弓根螺钉,并收集相关指标(侧偏、轴向/矢状角)。椎体长/宽(VL/VW)和椎弓根高/宽(PH/PW)由三位放射科医生在 L1-L5 处测量。分析包括使用 95% 置信区间 (CI)、± 1 mm(角度为 ± 2.08°)和类内相关系数 (ICC) 进行等效测试:在所有椎体水平上,无论是合并还是单独测量,CT 和 MRI 在所有椎弓根螺钉度量和几何测量方面的等效性均已得到证实,但 L1(平均差异:- 0.64 mm;[95%CI - 1.05,- 0.24])、L2(- 0.65 mm;[95%CI - 1.11,- 0.20])和 L4(- 0.78 mm;[95%CI - 1.11,- 0.46])的 VL 除外。所有椎体水平螺钉度量的评分者间和评分者内ICC分别为:CT为0.68-0.91和0.89-0.98;MRI为0.62-0.92和0.81-0.97。CT几何测量的评分者间和评分者内ICC分别为0.60-0.95和0.84-0.97,MRI为0.61-0.95和0.93-0.98:结论:与CT相比,深度学习三维核磁共振成像可对大多数腰椎进行等效的虚拟椎弓根螺钉植入和几何评估,但L1、L2和L4的椎体长度除外,适用于考虑接受机器人导航脊柱手术的患者的术前规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT.

Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT.

Purpose: To test equivalency of deep-learning 3D lumbar spine MRI with "CT-like" contrast to CT for virtual pedicle screw planning and geometric measurements in robotic-navigated spinal surgery.

Methods: Between December 2021 and June 2022, 16 patients referred for spinal fusion and decompression surgery with pre-operative CT and 3D MRI were retrospectively assessed. Pedicle screws were virtually placed on lumbar (L1-L5) and sacral (S1) vertebrae by three spine surgeons, and metrics (lateral deviation, axial/sagittal angles) were collected. Vertebral body length/width (VL/VW) and pedicle height/width (PH/PW) were measured at L1-L5 by three radiologists. Analysis included equivalency testing using the 95% confidence interval (CI), a margin of ± 1 mm (± 2.08° for angles), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: Across all vertebral levels, both combined and separately, equivalency between CT and MRI was proven for all pedicle screw metrics and geometric measurements, except for VL at L1 (mean difference: - 0.64 mm; [95%CI - 1.05, - 0.24]), L2 (- 0.65 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.20]), and L4 (- 0.78 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.46]). Inter- and intra-rater ICC for screw metrics across all vertebral levels combined ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 and 0.89-0.98 for CT, and from 0.62 to 0.92 and 0.81-0.97 for MRI, respectively. Inter- and intra-rater ICC for geometric measurements ranged from 0.60 to 0.95 and 0.84-0.97 for CT, and 0.61-0.95 and 0.93-0.98 for MRI, respectively.

Conclusion: Deep-learning 3D MRI facilitates equivalent virtual pedicle screw placements and geometric assessments for most lumbar vertebrae, with the exception of vertebral body length at L1, L2, and L4, compared to CT for pre-operative planning in patients considered for robotic-navigated spine surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信