[手术切缘是骨盆软骨肉瘤的预后因素。肉瘤科的队列研究]。

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2023-11-01
A R Lizcano-Suárez, M A Clara-Altamirano, S Velázquez-Rodríguez, H Martínez-Said, S V Villavicencio-Valencia, D Y García-Ortega
{"title":"[手术切缘是骨盆软骨肉瘤的预后因素。肉瘤科的队列研究]。","authors":"A R Lizcano-Suárez, M A Clara-Altamirano, S Velázquez-Rodríguez, H Martínez-Said, S V Villavicencio-Valencia, D Y García-Ortega","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignant tumor, constitutes approximately one quarter of all primary bone sarcomas. Surgical margins in pelvic chondrosarcoma have a direct impact as a prognostic factor, both on overall survival and on recurrence-free survival of this disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to analyze the impact of surgical margins as a prognostic factor in pelvic chondrosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a retrospective database cohort with prospective follow-up of sarcomas in patients diagnosed with primary pelvic chondrosarcoma who underwent surgical treatment. Clinical-demographic variables were obtained, a descriptive analysis of each variable was performed, and these were contrasted with the outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>seventeen patients were included, of which nine were female. The median age was 41 years, ranging from 23 to 65 years. The average tumor size was 20.9 cm (range 5 to 46 cm). The average surgical margin was 5.3 mm, ranging from 1 to 30 mm, with 58% positive margins. The average overall survival was 64 months (range 7 to 108 months). The distribution of pelvic involvement was as follows: zone I in nine patients (52.9%), zone II in two (11.8%), a combination of zones I-III in two (11.8%), I+II in one (5.9%), II+III in one (5.9%), I-III plus sacrum in one (5.9%) and I plus sacrum in one (5.9%). Tumor grades were classified as low in seven patients (41.2%), intermediate in sven (41.2%), high in two (11.8%), and dedifferentiated in one (5.9%). Regarding the type of resection, 12 patients (70.6%) underwent internal hemipelvectomy and five (29.4%) external hemipelvectomy. Recurrence was recorded in five cases (29.4%), metastasis in three (17.6%), and mortality in four (23.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>this series represents the largest cohort reported in Latin America of primary pelvic chondrosarcomas. A more favorable prognosis was observed in patients with surgical margins greater than 1 mm. The presence of chondrosarcoma in multiple pelvic zones was associated with a worse oncological prognosis. Additionally, a higher incidence of positive surgical margins and local recurrence rates were identified in pelvic chondrosarcomas compared to those located in the extremities.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"37 6","pages":"331-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical margins as prognostic factor in pelvis chondrosarcoma. Cohort study in a sarcoma unit].\",\"authors\":\"A R Lizcano-Suárez, M A Clara-Altamirano, S Velázquez-Rodríguez, H Martínez-Said, S V Villavicencio-Valencia, D Y García-Ortega\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignant tumor, constitutes approximately one quarter of all primary bone sarcomas. Surgical margins in pelvic chondrosarcoma have a direct impact as a prognostic factor, both on overall survival and on recurrence-free survival of this disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to analyze the impact of surgical margins as a prognostic factor in pelvic chondrosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a retrospective database cohort with prospective follow-up of sarcomas in patients diagnosed with primary pelvic chondrosarcoma who underwent surgical treatment. Clinical-demographic variables were obtained, a descriptive analysis of each variable was performed, and these were contrasted with the outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>seventeen patients were included, of which nine were female. The median age was 41 years, ranging from 23 to 65 years. The average tumor size was 20.9 cm (range 5 to 46 cm). The average surgical margin was 5.3 mm, ranging from 1 to 30 mm, with 58% positive margins. The average overall survival was 64 months (range 7 to 108 months). The distribution of pelvic involvement was as follows: zone I in nine patients (52.9%), zone II in two (11.8%), a combination of zones I-III in two (11.8%), I+II in one (5.9%), II+III in one (5.9%), I-III plus sacrum in one (5.9%) and I plus sacrum in one (5.9%). Tumor grades were classified as low in seven patients (41.2%), intermediate in sven (41.2%), high in two (11.8%), and dedifferentiated in one (5.9%). Regarding the type of resection, 12 patients (70.6%) underwent internal hemipelvectomy and five (29.4%) external hemipelvectomy. Recurrence was recorded in five cases (29.4%), metastasis in three (17.6%), and mortality in four (23.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>this series represents the largest cohort reported in Latin America of primary pelvic chondrosarcomas. A more favorable prognosis was observed in patients with surgical margins greater than 1 mm. The presence of chondrosarcoma in multiple pelvic zones was associated with a worse oncological prognosis. Additionally, a higher incidence of positive surgical margins and local recurrence rates were identified in pelvic chondrosarcomas compared to those located in the extremities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"331-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:软骨肉瘤是第二常见的原发性恶性肿瘤,约占所有原发性骨肉瘤的四分之一。骨盆软骨肉瘤的手术切缘作为预后因素,对该病的总生存率和无复发生存率都有直接影响。目的:分析手术切缘作为预后因素对骨盆软骨肉瘤的影响。材料与方法:对确诊为原发性骨盆软骨肉瘤并接受手术治疗的患者中的肉瘤进行前瞻性随访的回顾性数据库队列。结果:共纳入 17 例患者,其中 9 例为女性。中位年龄为 41 岁,从 23 岁到 65 岁不等。肿瘤平均大小为 20.9 厘米(5 至 46 厘米不等)。平均手术切缘为5.3毫米(1至30毫米不等),其中58%为阳性切缘。平均总生存期为64个月(7至108个月)。盆腔受累的分布情况如下:9例患者(52.9%)受累于I区,2例(11.8%)受累于II区,2例(11.8%)受累于I-III区,1例(5.9%)受累于I+II区,1例(5.9%)受累于II+III区,1例(5.9%)受累于I-III区加骶骨,1例(5.9%)受累于I区加骶骨。7 名患者(41.2%)的肿瘤分级为低度,7 名患者(41.2%)的肿瘤分级为中度,2 名患者(11.8%)的肿瘤分级为高度,1 名患者(5.9%)的肿瘤分级为未分化。在切除类型方面,12 名患者(70.6%)接受了内侧十二指肠切除术,5 名患者(29.4%)接受了外侧十二指肠切除术。5例(29.4%)复发,3例(17.6%)转移,4例(23.5%)死亡。手术切缘大于 1 毫米的患者预后较好。盆腔多发软骨肉瘤与较差的肿瘤预后有关。此外,与位于四肢的软骨肉瘤相比,盆腔软骨肉瘤的手术切缘阳性率和局部复发率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Surgical margins as prognostic factor in pelvis chondrosarcoma. Cohort study in a sarcoma unit].

Introduction: chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignant tumor, constitutes approximately one quarter of all primary bone sarcomas. Surgical margins in pelvic chondrosarcoma have a direct impact as a prognostic factor, both on overall survival and on recurrence-free survival of this disease.

Objectives: to analyze the impact of surgical margins as a prognostic factor in pelvic chondrosarcoma.

Material and methods: a retrospective database cohort with prospective follow-up of sarcomas in patients diagnosed with primary pelvic chondrosarcoma who underwent surgical treatment. Clinical-demographic variables were obtained, a descriptive analysis of each variable was performed, and these were contrasted with the outcome variables.

Results: seventeen patients were included, of which nine were female. The median age was 41 years, ranging from 23 to 65 years. The average tumor size was 20.9 cm (range 5 to 46 cm). The average surgical margin was 5.3 mm, ranging from 1 to 30 mm, with 58% positive margins. The average overall survival was 64 months (range 7 to 108 months). The distribution of pelvic involvement was as follows: zone I in nine patients (52.9%), zone II in two (11.8%), a combination of zones I-III in two (11.8%), I+II in one (5.9%), II+III in one (5.9%), I-III plus sacrum in one (5.9%) and I plus sacrum in one (5.9%). Tumor grades were classified as low in seven patients (41.2%), intermediate in sven (41.2%), high in two (11.8%), and dedifferentiated in one (5.9%). Regarding the type of resection, 12 patients (70.6%) underwent internal hemipelvectomy and five (29.4%) external hemipelvectomy. Recurrence was recorded in five cases (29.4%), metastasis in three (17.6%), and mortality in four (23.5%).

Conclusions: this series represents the largest cohort reported in Latin America of primary pelvic chondrosarcomas. A more favorable prognosis was observed in patients with surgical margins greater than 1 mm. The presence of chondrosarcoma in multiple pelvic zones was associated with a worse oncological prognosis. Additionally, a higher incidence of positive surgical margins and local recurrence rates were identified in pelvic chondrosarcomas compared to those located in the extremities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信