通过整个线粒体基因组序列了解 Haemaphysalis 属和 Archaeocroton 属蜱虫的系统发育,并将 Alloceraea Schulze 亚属(1919 年)提升为一个属。

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Samuel Kelava, Dmitry A. Apanaskevich, Renfu Shao, Alexander W. Gofton, Ben J. Mans, Ernest J. M. Teo, Gerrut Norval, Dayana Barker, Ryo Nakao, Stephen C. Barker
{"title":"通过整个线粒体基因组序列了解 Haemaphysalis 属和 Archaeocroton 属蜱虫的系统发育,并将 Alloceraea Schulze 亚属(1919 年)提升为一个属。","authors":"Samuel Kelava,&nbsp;Dmitry A. Apanaskevich,&nbsp;Renfu Shao,&nbsp;Alexander W. Gofton,&nbsp;Ben J. Mans,&nbsp;Ernest J. M. Teo,&nbsp;Gerrut Norval,&nbsp;Dayana Barker,&nbsp;Ryo Nakao,&nbsp;Stephen C. Barker","doi":"10.1111/mve.12708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We used entire mitochondrial (mt) genome sequences (14.5–15 kbp) to resolve the phylogeny of the four main lineages of the Haematobothrion ticks: <i>Alloceraea, Archaeocroton, Bothriocroton</i> and <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. In our phylogenetic trees, <i>Alloceraea</i> was the sister to <i>Archaeocroton sphenodonti</i>, a tick of an archetypal reptile, the tuatara, from New Zealand, to the exclusion of the rest of the species of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. The mt genomes of all four of the <i>Alloceraea</i> species that have been sequenced so far had a substantial insert, 132–312 bp, between the tRNA-Glu (E) gene and the <i>nad1</i> gene in their mt genomes. This insert was not found in any of the other eight subgenera of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. The mt genomes of 13 species of <i>Haemaphysalis</i> from NCBI GenBank were added to the most recent data set on <i>Haemaphysalis</i> and its close relatives to help resolve the phylogeny of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>, including five new subgenera of <i>Haemaphysalis</i> not previously considered by other authors: <i>Allophysalis</i> (structurally primitive), <i>Aboimisalis</i> (structurally primitive), <i>Herpetobia</i> (structurally intermediate), <i>Ornithophysalis</i> (structurally advanced) and <i>Segalia</i> (structurally advanced). We elevated <i>Alloceraea</i> Schulze, 1919 to the status of genus because <i>Alloceraea</i> Schulze, 1919 is phylogenetically distinct from the other subgenera of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. Moreover, we propose that the subgenus <i>Allophysalis</i> is the sister to the rest of the <i>Haemaphysalis</i> (14 subgenera) and that the ‘structurally primitive’ subgenera Hoogstraal and Kim comprise early diverging lineages. Our matrices of the pairwise genetic difference (percent) of mt genomes and partial 16S rRNA sequences indicated that the mt genome sequence of <i>Al</i>. <i>kitaokai</i> (gb# OM368280) may not be <i>Al</i>. <i>kitaokai</i> Hoogstraal, 1969 but rather another species of <i>Alloceraea</i>. In a similar way, the mt genome sequence of <i>H</i>. <i>(Herpetobia</i>) <i>nepalensis</i> Hoogstraal, 1962 (gb# NC_064124) was only 2% genetically different to that of <i>H</i>. (<i>Allophysalis</i>) <i>tibetensis</i> Hoogstraal, 1965 (gb# OM368293): this indicates to us that they are the same species. <i>Alloceraea cretacea</i> may be better placed in a genus other than <i>Alloceraea</i> Schulze, 1919. Reptiles may have been the host to the most recent common ancestor of <i>Archaeocroton</i> and <i>Alloceraea</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18350,"journal":{"name":"Medical and Veterinary Entomology","volume":"38 2","pages":"189-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mve.12708","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from entire mitochondrial genome sequences into the phylogeny of ticks of the genera Haemaphysalis and Archaeocroton with the elevation of the subgenus Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 back to the status of a genus\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Kelava,&nbsp;Dmitry A. Apanaskevich,&nbsp;Renfu Shao,&nbsp;Alexander W. Gofton,&nbsp;Ben J. Mans,&nbsp;Ernest J. M. Teo,&nbsp;Gerrut Norval,&nbsp;Dayana Barker,&nbsp;Ryo Nakao,&nbsp;Stephen C. Barker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mve.12708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We used entire mitochondrial (mt) genome sequences (14.5–15 kbp) to resolve the phylogeny of the four main lineages of the Haematobothrion ticks: <i>Alloceraea, Archaeocroton, Bothriocroton</i> and <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. In our phylogenetic trees, <i>Alloceraea</i> was the sister to <i>Archaeocroton sphenodonti</i>, a tick of an archetypal reptile, the tuatara, from New Zealand, to the exclusion of the rest of the species of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. The mt genomes of all four of the <i>Alloceraea</i> species that have been sequenced so far had a substantial insert, 132–312 bp, between the tRNA-Glu (E) gene and the <i>nad1</i> gene in their mt genomes. This insert was not found in any of the other eight subgenera of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. The mt genomes of 13 species of <i>Haemaphysalis</i> from NCBI GenBank were added to the most recent data set on <i>Haemaphysalis</i> and its close relatives to help resolve the phylogeny of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>, including five new subgenera of <i>Haemaphysalis</i> not previously considered by other authors: <i>Allophysalis</i> (structurally primitive), <i>Aboimisalis</i> (structurally primitive), <i>Herpetobia</i> (structurally intermediate), <i>Ornithophysalis</i> (structurally advanced) and <i>Segalia</i> (structurally advanced). We elevated <i>Alloceraea</i> Schulze, 1919 to the status of genus because <i>Alloceraea</i> Schulze, 1919 is phylogenetically distinct from the other subgenera of <i>Haemaphysalis</i>. Moreover, we propose that the subgenus <i>Allophysalis</i> is the sister to the rest of the <i>Haemaphysalis</i> (14 subgenera) and that the ‘structurally primitive’ subgenera Hoogstraal and Kim comprise early diverging lineages. Our matrices of the pairwise genetic difference (percent) of mt genomes and partial 16S rRNA sequences indicated that the mt genome sequence of <i>Al</i>. <i>kitaokai</i> (gb# OM368280) may not be <i>Al</i>. <i>kitaokai</i> Hoogstraal, 1969 but rather another species of <i>Alloceraea</i>. In a similar way, the mt genome sequence of <i>H</i>. <i>(Herpetobia</i>) <i>nepalensis</i> Hoogstraal, 1962 (gb# NC_064124) was only 2% genetically different to that of <i>H</i>. (<i>Allophysalis</i>) <i>tibetensis</i> Hoogstraal, 1965 (gb# OM368293): this indicates to us that they are the same species. <i>Alloceraea cretacea</i> may be better placed in a genus other than <i>Alloceraea</i> Schulze, 1919. Reptiles may have been the host to the most recent common ancestor of <i>Archaeocroton</i> and <i>Alloceraea</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical and Veterinary Entomology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"189-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mve.12708\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical and Veterinary Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mve.12708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical and Veterinary Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mve.12708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用整个线粒体(mt)基因组序列(14.5-15 kbp)来解析 Haematobothrion 蜱的四个主要系的系统发育:Alloceraea、Archaeocroton、Bothriocroton 和 Haemaphysalis。在我们的系统发生树中,Alloceraea 是 Archaeocroton sphenodonti 的姊妹,后者是新西兰一种典型爬行动物 Tuatara 的蜱,而 Haemaphysalis 的其他物种则被排除在外。迄今已测序的所有四个 Alloceraea 物种的 mt 基因组中,在 tRNA-Glu (E) 基因和 nad1 基因之间都有一个 132-312 bp 的大插入片段。在 Haemaphysalis 的其他八个亚属中都没有发现这种插入物。来自 NCBI GenBank 的 13 种 Haemaphysalis 的 mt 基因组被添加到 Haemaphysalis 及其近亲的最新数据集中,以帮助解决 Haemaphysalis 的系统发育问题,其中包括其他作者以前未考虑过的 Haemaphysalis 的五个新亚属:Allophysalis(结构原始)、Aboimisalis(结构原始)、Herpetobia(结构中级)、Ornithophysalis(结构高级)和 Segalia(结构高级)。我们将 Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 提升为属,是因为 Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 在系统发育上有别于 Haemaphysalis 的其他亚属。此外,我们还提出 Allophysalis 亚属是 Haemaphysalis 其他亚属(14 个亚属)的姊妹亚属,而 "结构原始 "的 Hoogstraal 亚属和 Kim 亚属则是早期分化的世系。我们的 mt 基因组和部分 16S rRNA 序列的成对遗传差异(百分比)矩阵表明,Al. kitaokai(gb# OM368280)的 mt 基因组序列可能不是 Al. kitaokai Hoogstraal, 1969,而是 Alloceraea 的另一个种。同样,H. (Herpetobia) nepalensis Hoogstraal, 1962(gb# NC_064124)的 mt 基因组序列与 H. (Allophysalis) tibetensis Hoogstraal, 1965(gb# OM368293)的 mt 基因组序列只有 2% 的遗传差异:这表明它们是同一物种。Alloceraea cretacea 最好归入 Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 以外的属。爬行动物可能是 Archaeocroton 和 Alloceraea 最近的共同祖先的宿主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Insights from entire mitochondrial genome sequences into the phylogeny of ticks of the genera Haemaphysalis and Archaeocroton with the elevation of the subgenus Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 back to the status of a genus

Insights from entire mitochondrial genome sequences into the phylogeny of ticks of the genera Haemaphysalis and Archaeocroton with the elevation of the subgenus Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 back to the status of a genus

We used entire mitochondrial (mt) genome sequences (14.5–15 kbp) to resolve the phylogeny of the four main lineages of the Haematobothrion ticks: Alloceraea, Archaeocroton, Bothriocroton and Haemaphysalis. In our phylogenetic trees, Alloceraea was the sister to Archaeocroton sphenodonti, a tick of an archetypal reptile, the tuatara, from New Zealand, to the exclusion of the rest of the species of Haemaphysalis. The mt genomes of all four of the Alloceraea species that have been sequenced so far had a substantial insert, 132–312 bp, between the tRNA-Glu (E) gene and the nad1 gene in their mt genomes. This insert was not found in any of the other eight subgenera of Haemaphysalis. The mt genomes of 13 species of Haemaphysalis from NCBI GenBank were added to the most recent data set on Haemaphysalis and its close relatives to help resolve the phylogeny of Haemaphysalis, including five new subgenera of Haemaphysalis not previously considered by other authors: Allophysalis (structurally primitive), Aboimisalis (structurally primitive), Herpetobia (structurally intermediate), Ornithophysalis (structurally advanced) and Segalia (structurally advanced). We elevated Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 to the status of genus because Alloceraea Schulze, 1919 is phylogenetically distinct from the other subgenera of Haemaphysalis. Moreover, we propose that the subgenus Allophysalis is the sister to the rest of the Haemaphysalis (14 subgenera) and that the ‘structurally primitive’ subgenera Hoogstraal and Kim comprise early diverging lineages. Our matrices of the pairwise genetic difference (percent) of mt genomes and partial 16S rRNA sequences indicated that the mt genome sequence of Al. kitaokai (gb# OM368280) may not be Al. kitaokai Hoogstraal, 1969 but rather another species of Alloceraea. In a similar way, the mt genome sequence of H. (Herpetobia) nepalensis Hoogstraal, 1962 (gb# NC_064124) was only 2% genetically different to that of H. (Allophysalis) tibetensis Hoogstraal, 1965 (gb# OM368293): this indicates to us that they are the same species. Alloceraea cretacea may be better placed in a genus other than Alloceraea Schulze, 1919. Reptiles may have been the host to the most recent common ancestor of Archaeocroton and Alloceraea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Medical and Veterinary Entomology 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical and Veterinary Entomology is the leading periodical in its field. The Journal covers the biology and control of insects, ticks, mites and other arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. The main strengths of the Journal lie in the fields of: -epidemiology and transmission of vector-borne pathogens changes in vector distribution that have impact on the pathogen transmission- arthropod behaviour and ecology- novel, field evaluated, approaches to biological and chemical control methods- host arthropod interactions. Please note that we do not consider submissions in forensic entomology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信