颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后邻近节段疾病的影像学风险因素:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1177/21925682241237500
Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Melissa Baker, Camilla Yoon, Hans-Joerg Meisel, Patrick Hsieh, Jeffrey C Wang, S Tim Yoon, Zorica Buser
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后邻近节段疾病的影像学风险因素:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Melissa Baker, Camilla Yoon, Hans-Joerg Meisel, Patrick Hsieh, Jeffrey C Wang, S Tim Yoon, Zorica Buser","doi":"10.1177/21925682241237500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the radiographic risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 2023. The primary inclusion criteria were degenerative spinal conditions treated with ACDF, comparing radiological parameters in patients with and without postoperative ASD. The radiographic parameters included intervertebral disc height, cervical sagittal alignment, sagittal segmental alignment, range of motion, segmental height, T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and plate to disc distance (PPD). Risk of bias was assessed for all studies. The Cochrane Review Manager was utilized to perform the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 7044 articles, 13 retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Three studies had \"not serious\" bias and the other 10 studies had serious or very serious bias. The total number of patients in the included studies was 1799 patients. Five studies included single-level ACDF, 2 studies included multi-level ACDF, and 6 studies included single or multi-level ACDF. On meta-analysis, the significant risk factors associated with ASD development were reduced postoperative cervical lordosis (mean difference [MD] = 3.35°, <i>P</i> = .002), reduced last-follow-up cervical lordosis (MD = -3.02°, <i>P</i> = .0003), increased preoperative to postoperative cervical sagittal alignment change (MD = -3.68°, <i>P</i> = .03), and the presence of developmental cervical canal stenosis (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.17, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decreased postoperative cervical lordosis, greater change in cervical sagittal alignment and developmental cervical canal stenosis were associated with an increased risk of ASD following ACDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Melissa Baker, Camilla Yoon, Hans-Joerg Meisel, Patrick Hsieh, Jeffrey C Wang, S Tim Yoon, Zorica Buser\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241237500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the radiographic risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 2023. The primary inclusion criteria were degenerative spinal conditions treated with ACDF, comparing radiological parameters in patients with and without postoperative ASD. The radiographic parameters included intervertebral disc height, cervical sagittal alignment, sagittal segmental alignment, range of motion, segmental height, T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and plate to disc distance (PPD). Risk of bias was assessed for all studies. The Cochrane Review Manager was utilized to perform the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 7044 articles, 13 retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Three studies had \\\"not serious\\\" bias and the other 10 studies had serious or very serious bias. The total number of patients in the included studies was 1799 patients. Five studies included single-level ACDF, 2 studies included multi-level ACDF, and 6 studies included single or multi-level ACDF. On meta-analysis, the significant risk factors associated with ASD development were reduced postoperative cervical lordosis (mean difference [MD] = 3.35°, <i>P</i> = .002), reduced last-follow-up cervical lordosis (MD = -3.02°, <i>P</i> = .0003), increased preoperative to postoperative cervical sagittal alignment change (MD = -3.68°, <i>P</i> = .03), and the presence of developmental cervical canal stenosis (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.17, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decreased postoperative cervical lordosis, greater change in cervical sagittal alignment and developmental cervical canal stenosis were associated with an increased risk of ASD following ACDF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241237500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241237500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计目的:评估颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术(ACDF)治疗颈椎退行性病变后邻近节段疾病(ASD)的影像学风险因素:评估治疗颈椎退行性病变的前路颈椎椎间盘切除及融合术(ACDF)后邻近节段疾病(ASD)的影像学风险因素:方法:检索了截至 2023 年 12 月的 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库。主要纳入标准是接受 ACDF 治疗的脊柱退行性病变,比较术后有无 ASD 患者的放射学参数。放射学参数包括椎间盘高度、颈椎矢状排列、矢状节段排列、活动范围、节段高度、T1斜率、矢状垂直轴(SVA)、胸椎入口角(TIA)和椎板至椎间盘距离(PPD)。对所有研究进行了偏倚风险评估。利用 Cochrane Review Manager 进行荟萃分析:在 7044 篇文章中,有 13 项回顾性研究被纳入最终分析。其中 3 项研究存在 "不严重 "的偏倚,其他 10 项研究存在严重或非常严重的偏倚。纳入研究的患者总数为 1799 人。5 项研究包括单层 ACDF,2 项研究包括多层 ACDF,6 项研究包括单层或多层 ACDF。根据荟萃分析,与 ASD 发展相关的显著风险因素包括术后颈椎前凸减少(平均差 [MD] = 3.35°,P = .002)、最后随访颈椎前凸减少(MD = -3.02°,P = .0003)、术前到术后颈椎矢状排列变化增加(MD = -3.68°,P = .03)以及存在发育性颈椎管狭窄(Odds ratio [OR] = 4.17,P < .001):结论:术后颈椎前凸减少、颈椎矢状线变化较大和发育性颈椎管狭窄与 ACDF 术后 ASD 风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: To assess the radiographic risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine pathologies.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to December 2023. The primary inclusion criteria were degenerative spinal conditions treated with ACDF, comparing radiological parameters in patients with and without postoperative ASD. The radiographic parameters included intervertebral disc height, cervical sagittal alignment, sagittal segmental alignment, range of motion, segmental height, T1 slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and plate to disc distance (PPD). Risk of bias was assessed for all studies. The Cochrane Review Manager was utilized to perform the meta-analysis.

Results: From 7044 articles, 13 retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Three studies had "not serious" bias and the other 10 studies had serious or very serious bias. The total number of patients in the included studies was 1799 patients. Five studies included single-level ACDF, 2 studies included multi-level ACDF, and 6 studies included single or multi-level ACDF. On meta-analysis, the significant risk factors associated with ASD development were reduced postoperative cervical lordosis (mean difference [MD] = 3.35°, P = .002), reduced last-follow-up cervical lordosis (MD = -3.02°, P = .0003), increased preoperative to postoperative cervical sagittal alignment change (MD = -3.68°, P = .03), and the presence of developmental cervical canal stenosis (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.17, P < .001).

Conclusions: Decreased postoperative cervical lordosis, greater change in cervical sagittal alignment and developmental cervical canal stenosis were associated with an increased risk of ASD following ACDF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信