健康成年人服用西洛他唑/瑞舒伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克)固定剂量复方制剂与同时服用单独成分的药代动力学和安全性比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jae Hoon Kim, Jang Hee Hong, Jin-Gyu Jung, Won Tae Jung, Kyu-Yeol Nam, Jae Seok Roh, Youn Woong Choi, Junbae Bang, Hyunwook Huh, Hye J. Lee, JungHa Moon, Jaehee Kim, Jung Sunwoo
{"title":"健康成年人服用西洛他唑/瑞舒伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克)固定剂量复方制剂与同时服用单独成分的药代动力学和安全性比较。","authors":"Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung,&nbsp;Won Tae Jung,&nbsp;Kyu-Yeol Nam,&nbsp;Jae Seok Roh,&nbsp;Youn Woong Choi,&nbsp;Junbae Bang,&nbsp;Hyunwook Huh,&nbsp;Hye J. Lee,&nbsp;JungHa Moon,&nbsp;Jaehee Kim,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The combined cilostazol and rosuvastatin therapy is frequently used for coronary artery disease treatment. This open-label, 3 × 3 crossover clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) versus a concurrent administration of the separate components (SCs) under both fasted and fed conditions. Among 48 enrolled healthy adults, 38 completed the study. Participants were administered a single oral dose of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg), either as an FDC or SCs in a fasted state, or FDC in a fed state, in each period of the trial. Blood samples were taken up to 48 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios of FDC to SCs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were 0.94/1.05 and 1.06/1.15 for cilostazol and rosuvastatin, respectively (AUC<sub>last</sub>/C<sub>max</sub>). Compared with that during fasting, fed-state administration increased the AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> for cilostazol by approximately 72% and 160% and decreased these parameters for rosuvastatin by approximately 39% and 43%, respectively. To conclude, the FDC is bioequivalent to the SCs, with notable differences in pharmacokinetics when administered in a fed state. No significant safety differences were observed between the treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Cilostazol/Rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) Versus Concurrent Administration of the Separate Components in Healthy Adults\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung,&nbsp;Won Tae Jung,&nbsp;Kyu-Yeol Nam,&nbsp;Jae Seok Roh,&nbsp;Youn Woong Choi,&nbsp;Junbae Bang,&nbsp;Hyunwook Huh,&nbsp;Hye J. Lee,&nbsp;JungHa Moon,&nbsp;Jaehee Kim,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The combined cilostazol and rosuvastatin therapy is frequently used for coronary artery disease treatment. This open-label, 3 × 3 crossover clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) versus a concurrent administration of the separate components (SCs) under both fasted and fed conditions. Among 48 enrolled healthy adults, 38 completed the study. Participants were administered a single oral dose of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg), either as an FDC or SCs in a fasted state, or FDC in a fed state, in each period of the trial. Blood samples were taken up to 48 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios of FDC to SCs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were 0.94/1.05 and 1.06/1.15 for cilostazol and rosuvastatin, respectively (AUC<sub>last</sub>/C<sub>max</sub>). Compared with that during fasting, fed-state administration increased the AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> for cilostazol by approximately 72% and 160% and decreased these parameters for rosuvastatin by approximately 39% and 43%, respectively. To conclude, the FDC is bioequivalent to the SCs, with notable differences in pharmacokinetics when administered in a fed state. No significant safety differences were observed between the treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西洛他唑和洛伐他汀联合疗法常用于冠心病治疗。这项开放标签、3 × 3交叉临床试验评估了西洛他唑/罗伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克)固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)与在空腹和进食条件下同时服用单独成分(SCs)的药代动力学和安全性。在 48 名参加研究的健康成年人中,有 38 人完成了研究。在试验的每个阶段,参与者口服一次西洛他唑/罗伐他汀(200 + 20 毫克),在空腹状态下服用 FDC 或 SCs,或在进食状态下服用 FDC。在服药后 48 小时内采集血样,并使用有效的液相色谱-串联质谱法分析血浆浓度。西洛他唑和罗伐他汀从零时到最后可定量浓度的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUClast)和最大血浆浓度(Cmax)的 FDC 与 SC 的几何平均比分别为 0.94/1.05 和 1.06/1.15 (AUClast /Cmax )。与空腹时相比,进食状态下服用西洛他唑的AUClast和Cmax分别增加了约72%和160%,而服用罗伐他汀的AUClast和Cmax则分别降低了约39%和43%。总之,FDC 与 SCs 具有生物等效性,但在进食状态下的药代动力学存在显著差异。两种治疗方法之间没有观察到明显的安全性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Cilostazol/Rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) Versus Concurrent Administration of the Separate Components in Healthy Adults

The combined cilostazol and rosuvastatin therapy is frequently used for coronary artery disease treatment. This open-label, 3 × 3 crossover clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg) versus a concurrent administration of the separate components (SCs) under both fasted and fed conditions. Among 48 enrolled healthy adults, 38 completed the study. Participants were administered a single oral dose of cilostazol/rosuvastatin (200 + 20 mg), either as an FDC or SCs in a fasted state, or FDC in a fed state, in each period of the trial. Blood samples were taken up to 48 hours after dosing, and plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios of FDC to SCs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were 0.94/1.05 and 1.06/1.15 for cilostazol and rosuvastatin, respectively (AUClast/Cmax). Compared with that during fasting, fed-state administration increased the AUClast and Cmax for cilostazol by approximately 72% and 160% and decreased these parameters for rosuvastatin by approximately 39% and 43%, respectively. To conclude, the FDC is bioequivalent to the SCs, with notable differences in pharmacokinetics when administered in a fed state. No significant safety differences were observed between the treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信