面对面和在线教师培训及督导反馈过程的经验

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
TESOL Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1002/tesj.815
Fiona Farr, Elaine Riordan
{"title":"面对面和在线教师培训及督导反馈过程的经验","authors":"Fiona Farr, Elaine Riordan","doi":"10.1002/tesj.815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\n<p>Research in the field of TESOL teacher preparation (TP) and supervisory practices is plentiful in the traditional face-to-face mode (Copland, <span>2012</span>; Farr, <span>2011</span>; Vásquez &amp; Reppen, <span>2007</span>) but further detail in required in order to more fully understand the affordances of the online mode. This research brief therefore focusses on the experiences of MA TESOL students and their TP tutors on their experiences of both online and in-person teaching and supervisory feedback practices as part of their 1-year MA TESOL programme at the University of Limerick, Ireland. Findings demonstrate positive evaluations of both online and face-to-face teaching and supervision, with some points of caution highlighted in order to maximise the value of both modes. For example, students' positive evaluations of face-to-face TP feedback included that the interactions were rich and personal, while the online mode provided for a calm, less face-threatening environment, with no negative evaluations of either mode. Tutors also had broadly similar positive evaluations for face-to-face and online feedback. They felt that giving TP feedback online and in person is similar, but supervising online is more difficult than face-to-face, mainly because the break out rooms cause issues for TP supervision, as tutors cannot be present in all rooms simultaneously. We therefore suggest recording break out room sessions and using them as evidence for a reflective activity for student teachers and their tutors to learn from. We also stress the importance of continuing reflective practice for MA student teachers and their supervision tutors concerning teaching and supervision in both modes in order to benefit from the complementary value of these modes and offer a well-rounded TP experience (please see supplementary video).</p>","PeriodicalId":51742,"journal":{"name":"TESOL Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of face‐to‐face and online teacher preparation and supervisory feedback processes\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Farr, Elaine Riordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tesj.815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\\n<p>Research in the field of TESOL teacher preparation (TP) and supervisory practices is plentiful in the traditional face-to-face mode (Copland, <span>2012</span>; Farr, <span>2011</span>; Vásquez &amp; Reppen, <span>2007</span>) but further detail in required in order to more fully understand the affordances of the online mode. This research brief therefore focusses on the experiences of MA TESOL students and their TP tutors on their experiences of both online and in-person teaching and supervisory feedback practices as part of their 1-year MA TESOL programme at the University of Limerick, Ireland. Findings demonstrate positive evaluations of both online and face-to-face teaching and supervision, with some points of caution highlighted in order to maximise the value of both modes. For example, students' positive evaluations of face-to-face TP feedback included that the interactions were rich and personal, while the online mode provided for a calm, less face-threatening environment, with no negative evaluations of either mode. Tutors also had broadly similar positive evaluations for face-to-face and online feedback. They felt that giving TP feedback online and in person is similar, but supervising online is more difficult than face-to-face, mainly because the break out rooms cause issues for TP supervision, as tutors cannot be present in all rooms simultaneously. We therefore suggest recording break out room sessions and using them as evidence for a reflective activity for student teachers and their tutors to learn from. We also stress the importance of continuing reflective practice for MA student teachers and their supervision tutors concerning teaching and supervision in both modes in order to benefit from the complementary value of these modes and offer a well-rounded TP experience (please see supplementary video).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TESOL Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TESOL Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TESOL Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1 引言 在传统的面对面模式下,TESOL 教师准备(TP)和督导实践领域的研究非常丰富(Copland, 2012; Farr, 2011; Vásquez & Reppen, 2007),但为了更充分地了解在线模式的可承受性,还需要更多的细节。因此,本研究简报重点关注爱尔兰利默里克大学 TESOL 硕士学生及其 TP 导师在为期一年的 TESOL 硕士课程中,对在线和面对面教学及督导反馈实践的体验。研究结果表明,学生对在线和面对面教学与督导都给予了积极评价,同时也强调了一些注意事项,以便最大限度地发挥这两种模式的价值。例如,学生对面对面 TP 反馈的积极评价包括互动内容丰富且具有个人特色,而在线模式则提供了一个平静、较少面对面威胁的环境,两种模式都没有负面评价。导师们对面对面和在线反馈的积极评价也大致相同。他们认为,在线和面对面的 TP 反馈是相似的,但在线督导比面对面更困难,主要是因为分组讨论室会给 TP 督导带来问题,因为导师不可能同时出现在所有房间。因此,我们建议记录分组讨论环节,并将其作为反思活动的证据,供学生教师及其导师借鉴。我们还强调,硕士生教师及其指导教师在两种模式的教学和指导中持续进行反思实践的重要性,以便从这两种模式的互补价值中获益,并提供全面的修课经验(请参阅补充视频)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of face‐to‐face and online teacher preparation and supervisory feedback processes

1 INTRODUCTION

Research in the field of TESOL teacher preparation (TP) and supervisory practices is plentiful in the traditional face-to-face mode (Copland, 2012; Farr, 2011; Vásquez & Reppen, 2007) but further detail in required in order to more fully understand the affordances of the online mode. This research brief therefore focusses on the experiences of MA TESOL students and their TP tutors on their experiences of both online and in-person teaching and supervisory feedback practices as part of their 1-year MA TESOL programme at the University of Limerick, Ireland. Findings demonstrate positive evaluations of both online and face-to-face teaching and supervision, with some points of caution highlighted in order to maximise the value of both modes. For example, students' positive evaluations of face-to-face TP feedback included that the interactions were rich and personal, while the online mode provided for a calm, less face-threatening environment, with no negative evaluations of either mode. Tutors also had broadly similar positive evaluations for face-to-face and online feedback. They felt that giving TP feedback online and in person is similar, but supervising online is more difficult than face-to-face, mainly because the break out rooms cause issues for TP supervision, as tutors cannot be present in all rooms simultaneously. We therefore suggest recording break out room sessions and using them as evidence for a reflective activity for student teachers and their tutors to learn from. We also stress the importance of continuing reflective practice for MA student teachers and their supervision tutors concerning teaching and supervision in both modes in order to benefit from the complementary value of these modes and offer a well-rounded TP experience (please see supplementary video).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TESOL Journal
TESOL Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: TESOL Journal (TJ) is a refereed, practitioner-oriented electronic journal based on current theory and research in the field of TESOL. TJ is a forum for second and foreign language educators at all levels to engage in the ways that research and theorizing can inform, shape, and ground teaching practices and perspectives. Articles enable an active and vibrant professional dialogue about research- and theory-based practices as well as practice-oriented theorizing and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信