利用单分子追踪技术比较活大肠杆菌中转录耦合 DNA 修复的 Mfd 依赖性模型和 UvrD 依赖性模型

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Elżbieta Kaja , Donata Vijande , Justyna Kowalczyk , Michał Michalak , Jacek Gapiński , Carolin Kobras , Philippa Rolfe , Mathew Stracy
{"title":"利用单分子追踪技术比较活大肠杆菌中转录耦合 DNA 修复的 Mfd 依赖性模型和 UvrD 依赖性模型","authors":"Elżbieta Kaja ,&nbsp;Donata Vijande ,&nbsp;Justyna Kowalczyk ,&nbsp;Michał Michalak ,&nbsp;Jacek Gapiński ,&nbsp;Carolin Kobras ,&nbsp;Philippa Rolfe ,&nbsp;Mathew Stracy","doi":"10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During transcription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) the detection of DNA damage and initiation of nucleotide excision repair (NER) is performed by translocating RNA polymerases (RNAP), which are arrested upon encountering bulky DNA lesions. Two opposing models of the subsequent steps of TCR in bacteria exist. In the first model, stalled RNAPs are removed from the damage site by recruitment of Mfd which dislodges RNAP by pushing it forwards before recruitment of UvrA and UvrB. In the second model, UvrD helicase backtracks RNAP from the lesion site. Recent studies have proposed that both UvrD and UvrA continuously associate with RNAP before damage occurs, which forms the primary damage sensor for NER. To test these two models of TCR in living <em>E. coli</em>, we applied super-resolution microscopy (PALM) combined with single particle tracking to directly measure the mobility and recruitment of Mfd, UvrD, UvrA, and UvrB to DNA during ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. The intracellular mobilities of NER proteins in the absence of DNA damage showed that most UvrA molecules could in principle be complexed with RNAP, however, this was not the case for UvrD. Upon DNA damage, Mfd recruitment to DNA was independent of the presence of UvrA, in agreement with its role upstream of this protein in the TCR pathway. In contrast, UvrD recruitment to DNA was strongly dependent on the presence of UvrA. Inhibiting transcription with rifampicin abolished Mfd DNA-recruitment following DNA damage, whereas significant UvrD, UvrA, and UvrB recruitment remained, consistent with a UvrD and UvrA performing their NER functions independently of transcribing RNAP. Together, although we find that up to ∼8 UvrD-RNAP-UvrA complexes per cell could potentially form in the absence of DNA damage, our live-cell data is not consistent with this complex being the primary DNA damage sensor for NER.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":300,"journal":{"name":"DNA Repair","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103665"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Mfd- and UvrD-dependent models of transcription coupled DNA repair in live Escherichia coli using single-molecule tracking\",\"authors\":\"Elżbieta Kaja ,&nbsp;Donata Vijande ,&nbsp;Justyna Kowalczyk ,&nbsp;Michał Michalak ,&nbsp;Jacek Gapiński ,&nbsp;Carolin Kobras ,&nbsp;Philippa Rolfe ,&nbsp;Mathew Stracy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>During transcription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) the detection of DNA damage and initiation of nucleotide excision repair (NER) is performed by translocating RNA polymerases (RNAP), which are arrested upon encountering bulky DNA lesions. Two opposing models of the subsequent steps of TCR in bacteria exist. In the first model, stalled RNAPs are removed from the damage site by recruitment of Mfd which dislodges RNAP by pushing it forwards before recruitment of UvrA and UvrB. In the second model, UvrD helicase backtracks RNAP from the lesion site. Recent studies have proposed that both UvrD and UvrA continuously associate with RNAP before damage occurs, which forms the primary damage sensor for NER. To test these two models of TCR in living <em>E. coli</em>, we applied super-resolution microscopy (PALM) combined with single particle tracking to directly measure the mobility and recruitment of Mfd, UvrD, UvrA, and UvrB to DNA during ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. The intracellular mobilities of NER proteins in the absence of DNA damage showed that most UvrA molecules could in principle be complexed with RNAP, however, this was not the case for UvrD. Upon DNA damage, Mfd recruitment to DNA was independent of the presence of UvrA, in agreement with its role upstream of this protein in the TCR pathway. In contrast, UvrD recruitment to DNA was strongly dependent on the presence of UvrA. Inhibiting transcription with rifampicin abolished Mfd DNA-recruitment following DNA damage, whereas significant UvrD, UvrA, and UvrB recruitment remained, consistent with a UvrD and UvrA performing their NER functions independently of transcribing RNAP. Together, although we find that up to ∼8 UvrD-RNAP-UvrA complexes per cell could potentially form in the absence of DNA damage, our live-cell data is not consistent with this complex being the primary DNA damage sensor for NER.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DNA Repair\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DNA Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568786424000417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568786424000417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在转录耦合 DNA 修复(TCR)过程中,DNA 损伤的检测和核苷酸切除修复(NER)的启动是由转运的 RNA 聚合酶(RNAP)完成的。细菌中 TCR 的后续步骤存在两种截然相反的模式。在第一种模式中,停滞的 RNAP 通过招募 Mfd 从损伤部位移除,Mfd 在招募 UvrA 和 UvrB 之前将 RNAP 推向前方,从而使其移位。在第二种模式中,UvrD 螺旋酶将 RNAP 从损伤部位反向追踪。最近的研究提出,UvrD 和 UvrA 都会在损伤发生前持续与 RNAP 结合,从而形成 NER 的主要损伤传感器。为了在活体中检验这两种 TCR 模型,我们应用超分辨显微镜(PALM)结合单颗粒追踪技术,直接测量了紫外线诱导 DNA 损伤过程中 Mfd、UvrD、UvrA 和 UvrB 在 DNA 上的移动性和招募情况。在没有DNA损伤的情况下,NER蛋白在细胞内的迁移率表明,大多数UvrA分子原则上可以与RNAP复合,但UvrD的情况并非如此。DNA 损伤时,Mfd 与 DNA 的结合与 UvrA 的存在无关,这与它在 TCR 途径中 UvrA 蛋白上游的作用一致。与此相反,UvrD在DNA上的招募强烈依赖于UvrA的存在。用利福平抑制转录可消除 DNA 损伤后的 Mfd DNA 招募,而 UvrD、UvrA 和 UvrB 的招募仍然显著,这与 UvrD 和 UvrA 独立于转录 RNAP 而发挥其 NER 功能是一致的。总之,尽管我们发现在没有 DNA 损伤的情况下,每个细胞可能会形成多达 ~8 个 UvrD-RNAP-UvrA 复合物,但我们的活细胞数据与该复合物是 NER 的主要 DNA 损伤传感器并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Mfd- and UvrD-dependent models of transcription coupled DNA repair in live Escherichia coli using single-molecule tracking

During transcription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) the detection of DNA damage and initiation of nucleotide excision repair (NER) is performed by translocating RNA polymerases (RNAP), which are arrested upon encountering bulky DNA lesions. Two opposing models of the subsequent steps of TCR in bacteria exist. In the first model, stalled RNAPs are removed from the damage site by recruitment of Mfd which dislodges RNAP by pushing it forwards before recruitment of UvrA and UvrB. In the second model, UvrD helicase backtracks RNAP from the lesion site. Recent studies have proposed that both UvrD and UvrA continuously associate with RNAP before damage occurs, which forms the primary damage sensor for NER. To test these two models of TCR in living E. coli, we applied super-resolution microscopy (PALM) combined with single particle tracking to directly measure the mobility and recruitment of Mfd, UvrD, UvrA, and UvrB to DNA during ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. The intracellular mobilities of NER proteins in the absence of DNA damage showed that most UvrA molecules could in principle be complexed with RNAP, however, this was not the case for UvrD. Upon DNA damage, Mfd recruitment to DNA was independent of the presence of UvrA, in agreement with its role upstream of this protein in the TCR pathway. In contrast, UvrD recruitment to DNA was strongly dependent on the presence of UvrA. Inhibiting transcription with rifampicin abolished Mfd DNA-recruitment following DNA damage, whereas significant UvrD, UvrA, and UvrB recruitment remained, consistent with a UvrD and UvrA performing their NER functions independently of transcribing RNAP. Together, although we find that up to ∼8 UvrD-RNAP-UvrA complexes per cell could potentially form in the absence of DNA damage, our live-cell data is not consistent with this complex being the primary DNA damage sensor for NER.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DNA Repair
DNA Repair 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: DNA Repair provides a forum for the comprehensive coverage of DNA repair and cellular responses to DNA damage. The journal publishes original observations on genetic, cellular, biochemical, structural and molecular aspects of DNA repair, mutagenesis, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and other biological responses in cells exposed to genomic insult, as well as their relationship to human disease. DNA Repair publishes full-length research articles, brief reports on research, and reviews. The journal welcomes articles describing databases, methods and new technologies supporting research on DNA repair and responses to DNA damage. Letters to the Editor, hot topics and classics in DNA repair, historical reflections, book reviews and meeting reports also will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信