论双曲守恒定律高阶保界方案的最优单元平均分解

IF 2.8 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Shumo Cui, Shengrong Ding, Kailiang Wu
{"title":"论双曲守恒定律高阶保界方案的最优单元平均分解","authors":"Shumo Cui, Shengrong Ding, Kailiang Wu","doi":"10.1137/23m1549365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 775-810, April 2024. <br/> Abstract. Cell average decomposition (CAD) plays a critical role in constructing bound-preserving (BP) high-order discontinuous Galerkin and finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. Seeking optimal CAD (OCAD) that attains the mildest BP Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition is a fundamentally important yet difficult problem. The classic CAD, proposed in 2010 by Zhang and Shu using the Gauss–Lobatto quadrature, has been widely used over the past decade. Zhang and Shu only checked for the 1D [math] and [math] spaces that their classic CAD is optimal. However, we recently discovered that the classic CAD is generally not optimal for the multidimensional [math] and [math] spaces. Yet, it remained unknown for a decade what CAD is optimal for higher-degree polynomial spaces, especially in multiple dimensions. This paper presents the first systematical analysis and establishes the general theory on the OCAD problem, which lays a foundation for designing more efficient BP schemes. The analysis is very nontrivial and involves novel techniques from several branches of mathematics, including Carathéodory’s theorem from convex geometry, and the invariant theory of symmetric group in abstract algebra. Most notably, we discover that the OCAD problem is closely related to polynomial optimization of a positive linear functional on the positive polynomial cone, thereby establishing four useful criteria for examining the optimality of a feasible CAD. Using the established theory, we rigorously prove that the classic CAD is optimal for general 1D [math] spaces and general 2D [math] spaces of an arbitrary [math]. For the widely used 2D [math] spaces, the classic CAD is, however, not optimal, and we develop a generic approach to find out the genuine OCAD and propose a more practical quasi-optimal CAD, both of which provide much milder BP CFL conditions than the classic CAD yet require much fewer nodes. These findings notably improve the efficiency of general high-order BP methods for a large class of hyperbolic equations while requiring only a minor adjustment of the implementation code. The notable advantages in efficiency are further confirmed by numerical results.","PeriodicalId":49527,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Optimal Cell Average Decomposition for High-Order Bound-Preserving Schemes of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws\",\"authors\":\"Shumo Cui, Shengrong Ding, Kailiang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/23m1549365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 775-810, April 2024. <br/> Abstract. Cell average decomposition (CAD) plays a critical role in constructing bound-preserving (BP) high-order discontinuous Galerkin and finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. Seeking optimal CAD (OCAD) that attains the mildest BP Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition is a fundamentally important yet difficult problem. The classic CAD, proposed in 2010 by Zhang and Shu using the Gauss–Lobatto quadrature, has been widely used over the past decade. Zhang and Shu only checked for the 1D [math] and [math] spaces that their classic CAD is optimal. However, we recently discovered that the classic CAD is generally not optimal for the multidimensional [math] and [math] spaces. Yet, it remained unknown for a decade what CAD is optimal for higher-degree polynomial spaces, especially in multiple dimensions. This paper presents the first systematical analysis and establishes the general theory on the OCAD problem, which lays a foundation for designing more efficient BP schemes. The analysis is very nontrivial and involves novel techniques from several branches of mathematics, including Carathéodory’s theorem from convex geometry, and the invariant theory of symmetric group in abstract algebra. Most notably, we discover that the OCAD problem is closely related to polynomial optimization of a positive linear functional on the positive polynomial cone, thereby establishing four useful criteria for examining the optimality of a feasible CAD. Using the established theory, we rigorously prove that the classic CAD is optimal for general 1D [math] spaces and general 2D [math] spaces of an arbitrary [math]. For the widely used 2D [math] spaces, the classic CAD is, however, not optimal, and we develop a generic approach to find out the genuine OCAD and propose a more practical quasi-optimal CAD, both of which provide much milder BP CFL conditions than the classic CAD yet require much fewer nodes. These findings notably improve the efficiency of general high-order BP methods for a large class of hyperbolic equations while requiring only a minor adjustment of the implementation code. The notable advantages in efficiency are further confirmed by numerical results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1549365\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1549365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SIAM 数值分析期刊》第 62 卷第 2 期第 775-810 页,2024 年 4 月。 摘要。单元平均分解(CAD)在构建双曲守恒定律的保界(BP)高阶非连续 Galerkin 和有限体积方法中起着至关重要的作用。寻求能达到最温和 BP Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy(CFL)条件的最优 CAD(OCAD)是一个重要而又困难的基本问题。张和舒于 2010 年利用高斯-洛巴托正交提出的经典 CAD 在过去十年中得到了广泛应用。张和舒只检验了一维 [math] 和 [math] 空间,他们的经典 CAD 是最优的。然而,我们最近发现,对于多维[math]和[math]空间,经典 CAD 通常不是最优的。然而,对于高阶多项式空间,尤其是多维空间,什么样的 CAD 才是最优的,十年来一直是个未知数。本文首次系统分析并建立了 OCAD 问题的一般理论,为设计更高效的 BP 方案奠定了基础。该分析非常非难,涉及多个数学分支的新技术,包括凸几何中的 Carathéodory 定理和抽象代数中的对称群不变理论。最值得注意的是,我们发现 OCAD 问题与正多项式锥上正线性函数的多项式优化密切相关,从而建立了考察可行 CAD 最佳性的四个有用标准。利用已建立的理论,我们严格证明了经典 CAD 对于任意[数学]的一般一维[数学]空间和一般二维[数学]空间都是最优的。对于广泛使用的二维[数学]空间,经典 CAD 并不是最优的,因此我们开发了一种通用方法来找出真正的 OCAD,并提出了一种更实用的准最优 CAD。这些发现显著提高了一般高阶双曲方程 BP 方法的效率,同时只需对实现代码稍作调整。数值结果进一步证实了效率上的显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Optimal Cell Average Decomposition for High-Order Bound-Preserving Schemes of Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 775-810, April 2024.
Abstract. Cell average decomposition (CAD) plays a critical role in constructing bound-preserving (BP) high-order discontinuous Galerkin and finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. Seeking optimal CAD (OCAD) that attains the mildest BP Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition is a fundamentally important yet difficult problem. The classic CAD, proposed in 2010 by Zhang and Shu using the Gauss–Lobatto quadrature, has been widely used over the past decade. Zhang and Shu only checked for the 1D [math] and [math] spaces that their classic CAD is optimal. However, we recently discovered that the classic CAD is generally not optimal for the multidimensional [math] and [math] spaces. Yet, it remained unknown for a decade what CAD is optimal for higher-degree polynomial spaces, especially in multiple dimensions. This paper presents the first systematical analysis and establishes the general theory on the OCAD problem, which lays a foundation for designing more efficient BP schemes. The analysis is very nontrivial and involves novel techniques from several branches of mathematics, including Carathéodory’s theorem from convex geometry, and the invariant theory of symmetric group in abstract algebra. Most notably, we discover that the OCAD problem is closely related to polynomial optimization of a positive linear functional on the positive polynomial cone, thereby establishing four useful criteria for examining the optimality of a feasible CAD. Using the established theory, we rigorously prove that the classic CAD is optimal for general 1D [math] spaces and general 2D [math] spaces of an arbitrary [math]. For the widely used 2D [math] spaces, the classic CAD is, however, not optimal, and we develop a generic approach to find out the genuine OCAD and propose a more practical quasi-optimal CAD, both of which provide much milder BP CFL conditions than the classic CAD yet require much fewer nodes. These findings notably improve the efficiency of general high-order BP methods for a large class of hyperbolic equations while requiring only a minor adjustment of the implementation code. The notable advantages in efficiency are further confirmed by numerical results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis (SINUM) contains research articles on the development and analysis of numerical methods. Topics include the rigorous study of convergence of algorithms, their accuracy, their stability, and their computational complexity. Also included are results in mathematical analysis that contribute to algorithm analysis, and computational results that demonstrate algorithm behavior and applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信