亚洲重症 COVID-19 患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:前瞻性队列研究

Q4 Medicine
Nithita Nanthatanti , Pichika Chantrathammachart , Kanin Thammavaranucupt , Kulapong Jayanama , Nuttee Supatrawiporn , Sithakom Phusanti , Somnuek Sungkanuparph , Sirawat Srichatrapimuk , Suppachok Kirdlarp , Supawadee Suppagungsuk , Thananya Wongsinin , Dhanesh Pitidhammabhorn , Pantep Angchaisuksiri
{"title":"亚洲重症 COVID-19 患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Nithita Nanthatanti ,&nbsp;Pichika Chantrathammachart ,&nbsp;Kanin Thammavaranucupt ,&nbsp;Kulapong Jayanama ,&nbsp;Nuttee Supatrawiporn ,&nbsp;Sithakom Phusanti ,&nbsp;Somnuek Sungkanuparph ,&nbsp;Sirawat Srichatrapimuk ,&nbsp;Suppachok Kirdlarp ,&nbsp;Supawadee Suppagungsuk ,&nbsp;Thananya Wongsinin ,&nbsp;Dhanesh Pitidhammabhorn ,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri","doi":"10.1016/j.tru.2024.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; <em>p</em> = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34401,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X/pdfft?md5=cb1fb7684b360b50795641e8fbd6bceb&pid=1-s2.0-S266657272400004X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Asian patients with severe COVID-19: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Nithita Nanthatanti ,&nbsp;Pichika Chantrathammachart ,&nbsp;Kanin Thammavaranucupt ,&nbsp;Kulapong Jayanama ,&nbsp;Nuttee Supatrawiporn ,&nbsp;Sithakom Phusanti ,&nbsp;Somnuek Sungkanuparph ,&nbsp;Sirawat Srichatrapimuk ,&nbsp;Suppachok Kirdlarp ,&nbsp;Supawadee Suppagungsuk ,&nbsp;Thananya Wongsinin ,&nbsp;Dhanesh Pitidhammabhorn ,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tru.2024.100162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; <em>p</em> = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X/pdfft?md5=cb1fb7684b360b50795641e8fbd6bceb&pid=1-s2.0-S266657272400004X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019 年严重冠状病毒病(COVID-19)会引发各种凝血级联反应,最终导致静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)。在泰国的严重COVID-19病例中,抗凝剂预防对避免VTE发生的效果仍不确定。我们旨在确定接受标准剂量抗凝药物治疗的重症 COVID-19 患者中症状性 VTE 的发生率,并评估其风险因素。我们的前瞻性队列研究纳入了接受抗凝剂预防的重度 COVID-19 患者。我们对 VTE、出血事件和死亡率进行了监测,直至 VTE 预防开始后 60 天。在 250 名研究患者中,7.2% 的患者出现了肺栓塞。在多变量 Cox 回归模型中,气管插管[危险比 (HR) = 13.75; 95% 置信区间 (CI) = 2.87-65.82; p = 0.001]和高 D-二聚体水平[HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023-1.081; p <0.001]与 VTE 预防后 60 天内较高的 VTE 风险显著相关。分别有 35 例(14%)和 8 例(3.2%)患者发生出血和大出血。这些发现表明,标准剂量的抗凝剂可能不足以预防需要重症监护的患者出现血栓。有必要进一步研究合适的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Asian patients with severe COVID-19: A prospective cohort study

The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; p = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis Update
Thrombosis Update Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
86 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信