{"title":"亚洲重症 COVID-19 患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防:前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Nithita Nanthatanti , Pichika Chantrathammachart , Kanin Thammavaranucupt , Kulapong Jayanama , Nuttee Supatrawiporn , Sithakom Phusanti , Somnuek Sungkanuparph , Sirawat Srichatrapimuk , Suppachok Kirdlarp , Supawadee Suppagungsuk , Thananya Wongsinin , Dhanesh Pitidhammabhorn , Pantep Angchaisuksiri","doi":"10.1016/j.tru.2024.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; <em>p</em> = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; <em>p</em> < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34401,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X/pdfft?md5=cb1fb7684b360b50795641e8fbd6bceb&pid=1-s2.0-S266657272400004X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Asian patients with severe COVID-19: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Nithita Nanthatanti , Pichika Chantrathammachart , Kanin Thammavaranucupt , Kulapong Jayanama , Nuttee Supatrawiporn , Sithakom Phusanti , Somnuek Sungkanuparph , Sirawat Srichatrapimuk , Suppachok Kirdlarp , Supawadee Suppagungsuk , Thananya Wongsinin , Dhanesh Pitidhammabhorn , Pantep Angchaisuksiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tru.2024.100162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; <em>p</em> = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; <em>p</em> < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X/pdfft?md5=cb1fb7684b360b50795641e8fbd6bceb&pid=1-s2.0-S266657272400004X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266657272400004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Asian patients with severe COVID-19: A prospective cohort study
The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; p = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.