{"title":"多变量过程和模型预测控制的目标激励和再识别方法","authors":"Masanori Oshima , Sanghong Kim , Yuri A.W. Shardt , Ken-Ichiro Sotowa","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A process controlled using model predictive control is required to be re-identified when significant plant-model mismatch (PMM) occurs. During data acquisition for re-identification, the process is excited to enable accurate re-identification. However, the process excitation worsens the control performance. To prevent this problem, a new model-update framework that consists of targeted excitation (TE) and targeted re-identification (TR) is proposed. In TE, only the manipulated variables corresponding to problematic transfer functions that have significant PMM are excited during data acquisition. On the other hand, the other manipulated variables are optimized to suppress the variations of the controlled variables. After data is acquired using TE, the TR method re-identifies only the problematic transfer functions by using the other transfer-function models without large PMM. The validity of the proposed framework is examined by theoretical analysis and numerical case studies. In the theoretical analysis, the stability during data acquisition using TE and the asymptotic bias of the parameters re-identified using TR were considered. In the numerical case studies, the applicability of the proposed framework to several processes including a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process was examined. As a result, it was shown that, for all the processes, the proposed framework can improve both the control performance during data acquisition and the model accuracy after re-identification, compared to an existing method that excites all the inputs during data acquisition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Process Control","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 103190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted excitation and re-identification methods for multivariate process and model predictive control\",\"authors\":\"Masanori Oshima , Sanghong Kim , Yuri A.W. Shardt , Ken-Ichiro Sotowa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A process controlled using model predictive control is required to be re-identified when significant plant-model mismatch (PMM) occurs. During data acquisition for re-identification, the process is excited to enable accurate re-identification. However, the process excitation worsens the control performance. To prevent this problem, a new model-update framework that consists of targeted excitation (TE) and targeted re-identification (TR) is proposed. In TE, only the manipulated variables corresponding to problematic transfer functions that have significant PMM are excited during data acquisition. On the other hand, the other manipulated variables are optimized to suppress the variations of the controlled variables. After data is acquired using TE, the TR method re-identifies only the problematic transfer functions by using the other transfer-function models without large PMM. The validity of the proposed framework is examined by theoretical analysis and numerical case studies. In the theoretical analysis, the stability during data acquisition using TE and the asymptotic bias of the parameters re-identified using TR were considered. In the numerical case studies, the applicability of the proposed framework to several processes including a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process was examined. As a result, it was shown that, for all the processes, the proposed framework can improve both the control performance during data acquisition and the model accuracy after re-identification, compared to an existing method that excites all the inputs during data acquisition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424000301\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Process Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424000301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
使用模型预测控制的过程需要在发生严重的工厂-模型不匹配(PMM)时进行重新识别。在重新识别的数据采集过程中,需要对过程进行激励,以实现准确的重新识别。然而,过程激励会降低控制性能。为了避免这一问题,我们提出了一种新的模型更新框架,包括目标激励(TE)和目标重新识别(TR)。在 TE 中,在数据采集过程中,只有与具有显著 PMM 的问题传递函数相对应的操纵变量才会被激励。另一方面,对其他操纵变量进行优化,以抑制受控变量的变化。在使用 TE 获取数据后,TR 方法通过使用其他没有较大 PMM 的传递函数模型,仅重新识别有问题的传递函数。理论分析和数值案例研究检验了所提出框架的有效性。在理论分析中,考虑了使用 TE 方法获取数据期间的稳定性,以及使用 TR 方法重新识别参数的渐进偏差。在数值案例研究中,考察了建议框架对包括流体催化裂化(FCC)过程在内的若干过程的适用性。结果表明,对于所有过程,与在数据采集期间激发所有输入的现有方法相比,所提出的框架既能提高数据采集期间的控制性能,又能提高重新识别后的模型准确性。
Targeted excitation and re-identification methods for multivariate process and model predictive control
A process controlled using model predictive control is required to be re-identified when significant plant-model mismatch (PMM) occurs. During data acquisition for re-identification, the process is excited to enable accurate re-identification. However, the process excitation worsens the control performance. To prevent this problem, a new model-update framework that consists of targeted excitation (TE) and targeted re-identification (TR) is proposed. In TE, only the manipulated variables corresponding to problematic transfer functions that have significant PMM are excited during data acquisition. On the other hand, the other manipulated variables are optimized to suppress the variations of the controlled variables. After data is acquired using TE, the TR method re-identifies only the problematic transfer functions by using the other transfer-function models without large PMM. The validity of the proposed framework is examined by theoretical analysis and numerical case studies. In the theoretical analysis, the stability during data acquisition using TE and the asymptotic bias of the parameters re-identified using TR were considered. In the numerical case studies, the applicability of the proposed framework to several processes including a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process was examined. As a result, it was shown that, for all the processes, the proposed framework can improve both the control performance during data acquisition and the model accuracy after re-identification, compared to an existing method that excites all the inputs during data acquisition.
期刊介绍:
This international journal covers the application of control theory, operations research, computer science and engineering principles to the solution of process control problems. In addition to the traditional chemical processing and manufacturing applications, the scope of process control problems involves a wide range of applications that includes energy processes, nano-technology, systems biology, bio-medical engineering, pharmaceutical processing technology, energy storage and conversion, smart grid, and data analytics among others.
Papers on the theory in these areas will also be accepted provided the theoretical contribution is aimed at the application and the development of process control techniques.
Topics covered include:
• Control applications• Process monitoring• Plant-wide control• Process control systems• Control techniques and algorithms• Process modelling and simulation• Design methods
Advanced design methods exclude well established and widely studied traditional design techniques such as PID tuning and its many variants. Applications in fields such as control of automotive engines, machinery and robotics are not deemed suitable unless a clear motivation for the relevance to process control is provided.