监测食品负担能力:在线营养菜篮子的可靠性和有效性。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Liza Boyar, Ellis Lakhani, Ivan Ho, Bridget King, Lauren Kennedy, Mary Ellen Prange, Daniel Harrington, Rachel Prowse
{"title":"监测食品负担能力:在线营养菜篮子的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Liza Boyar, Ellis Lakhani, Ivan Ho, Bridget King, Lauren Kennedy, Mary Ellen Prange, Daniel Harrington, Rachel Prowse","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2023-022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of an online approach to monitoring food affordability in Ontario using the updated Ontario Nutritious Food Basket (ONFB).<b>Methods:</b> The ONFB was priced online in 12 large multi-chain grocery stores to test intra-/inter-rater reliability using percent agreement and intra-class correlations (ICCs). Then, the ONFB was priced in-store and online in 28 stores to estimate food price differences using paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation for all (n =1708) and matched items (same product/brand and purchase unit) (n = 1134).<b>Results:</b> Intra-/inter-rater agreement was high (95.4%/81.6%; ICC = 0.972, F = 69.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). On average, in-store prices were less than $0.02 lower than online prices. There were no significant differences between mean in-store and online prices for all items (t = 0.504 <i>p</i> = 0.614). The mean price was almost perfectly correlated between in-store and online (fully matched: R = 0.993 <i>p</i> < 0.001; all items: R = 0.967 <i>p</i> < 0.001). Online monthly ONFB estimates for a family of four were strongly correlated (R = 0.937 <i>p</i> < 0.001) with estimates calculated using in-store data.<b>Conclusions:</b> Online pricing is a reliable and valid approach to food costing in Ontario that contributes to modernizing the monitoring of food affordability in Canada and abroad.</p>","PeriodicalId":56135,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Food Affordability: Reliability and Validity of an Online Nutritious Food Basket.\",\"authors\":\"Liza Boyar, Ellis Lakhani, Ivan Ho, Bridget King, Lauren Kennedy, Mary Ellen Prange, Daniel Harrington, Rachel Prowse\",\"doi\":\"10.3148/cjdpr-2023-022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of an online approach to monitoring food affordability in Ontario using the updated Ontario Nutritious Food Basket (ONFB).<b>Methods:</b> The ONFB was priced online in 12 large multi-chain grocery stores to test intra-/inter-rater reliability using percent agreement and intra-class correlations (ICCs). Then, the ONFB was priced in-store and online in 28 stores to estimate food price differences using paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation for all (n =1708) and matched items (same product/brand and purchase unit) (n = 1134).<b>Results:</b> Intra-/inter-rater agreement was high (95.4%/81.6%; ICC = 0.972, F = 69.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). On average, in-store prices were less than $0.02 lower than online prices. There were no significant differences between mean in-store and online prices for all items (t = 0.504 <i>p</i> = 0.614). The mean price was almost perfectly correlated between in-store and online (fully matched: R = 0.993 <i>p</i> < 0.001; all items: R = 0.967 <i>p</i> < 0.001). Online monthly ONFB estimates for a family of four were strongly correlated (R = 0.937 <i>p</i> < 0.001) with estimates calculated using in-store data.<b>Conclusions:</b> Online pricing is a reliable and valid approach to food costing in Ontario that contributes to modernizing the monitoring of food affordability in Canada and abroad.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"59-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2023-022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2023-022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估使用最新的安大略省营养菜篮子(ONFB)在线监测安大略省食品可负担性的方法的可靠性和有效性:方法:在 12 家大型多连锁杂货店对安大略省营养菜篮子进行在线定价,使用一致率和类内相关性(ICC)测试评分者内部/评分者之间的可靠性。然后,在 28 家商店对 ONFB 进行了店内和网上定价,使用配对 t 检验和皮尔逊相关性估算了所有项目(n = 1708)和匹配项目(相同产品/品牌和购买单位)(n = 1134)的食品价格差异:评分者内部/评分者之间的一致性很高(95.4%/81.6%;ICC = 0.972,F = 69.9,P = 0.614)。店内和网上的平均价格几乎完全相关(完全匹配:结论:在安大略省,在线定价是一种可靠有效的食品成本计算方法,有助于对加拿大和国外的食品可负担性进行现代化监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring Food Affordability: Reliability and Validity of an Online Nutritious Food Basket.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of an online approach to monitoring food affordability in Ontario using the updated Ontario Nutritious Food Basket (ONFB).Methods: The ONFB was priced online in 12 large multi-chain grocery stores to test intra-/inter-rater reliability using percent agreement and intra-class correlations (ICCs). Then, the ONFB was priced in-store and online in 28 stores to estimate food price differences using paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation for all (n =1708) and matched items (same product/brand and purchase unit) (n = 1134).Results: Intra-/inter-rater agreement was high (95.4%/81.6%; ICC = 0.972, F = 69.9, p < 0.001). On average, in-store prices were less than $0.02 lower than online prices. There were no significant differences between mean in-store and online prices for all items (t = 0.504 p = 0.614). The mean price was almost perfectly correlated between in-store and online (fully matched: R = 0.993 p < 0.001; all items: R = 0.967 p < 0.001). Online monthly ONFB estimates for a family of four were strongly correlated (R = 0.937 p < 0.001) with estimates calculated using in-store data.Conclusions: Online pricing is a reliable and valid approach to food costing in Ontario that contributes to modernizing the monitoring of food affordability in Canada and abroad.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal considers manuscripts for publication that focus on applied food and nutrition research with direct application to the Canadian healthcare system and other contributions relevant to Canadian dietetic practice. The Journal does not publish market research studies, author opinions or animal studies. Manuscripts may be in English or French.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信