轻度至中度银屑病患者接受或不接受他扎罗汀和骨化三醇序贯疗法的头对头比较:一项随机开放标签研究

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_10_23
Jaspreet Kaur Sidhu, Prithpal Singh Matreja, Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Amandeep Singh, Surjit Singh
{"title":"轻度至中度银屑病患者接受或不接受他扎罗汀和骨化三醇序贯疗法的头对头比较:一项随机开放标签研究","authors":"Jaspreet Kaur Sidhu, Prithpal Singh Matreja, Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Amandeep Singh, Surjit Singh","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_10_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease that causes rapid turnover of skin cells. It is a chronic disease that affects a patient's quality of life significantly and frequently requires long-term treatment. The study on sequential therapy with tazarotene 0.1% and calcitriol 0.0003% has not been tried so far; hence, we designed this study to compare the safety and efficacy of sequential therapy with tazarotene 0.1% cream and calcitriol 0.0003% ointment versus monotherapy in mild-to-moderate stable plaque psoriasis (SPP). The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of topical sequential treatment with tazarotene followed by calcitriol, topical calcitriol followed by tazarotene, tazarotene monotherapy, calcitriol monotherapy, and compare the safety and efficacy of the sequential therapies with monotherapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single center, prospective parallel-group, active control, randomized study of 16 weeks duration (treatment for 8 weeks and follow-up for 16 weeks), randomized to either of the four groups, i.e., tazarotene 0.1% for 4 weeks followed by calcitriol 0.0003% for 4 weeks or calcitriol 0.0003% for 4 weeks followed by tazarotene 0.1% for 4 weeks or tazarotene 0.1% for 8 weeks or calcitriol 0.0003% for 8 weeks. Both tazarotene and calcitriol were applied once daily in all the groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was no significant difference with regard to age and duration of illness among the four treatment groups. Statistically significant improvement was observed in erythema, scaling, and induration scores, and Physician`s global assessment scale at 8 weeks and 16 weeks as compared to baseline in tazarotene - calcitriol, calcitriol - tazarotene, and calcitriol versus tazarotene groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that topical treatment with tazarotene 0.1% and calcitriol 0.003% was efficacious in treating mild-to-moderate SPP as both sequential and monotherapy. However, topical treatment with tazarotene as monotherapy was the least efficacious.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"12 2","pages":"44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head-to-Head Comparison of Tazarotene and Calcitriol with or without Sequential Therapy in Mild-to-Moderate Psoriasis: A Randomized Open-label Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jaspreet Kaur Sidhu, Prithpal Singh Matreja, Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Amandeep Singh, Surjit Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_10_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease that causes rapid turnover of skin cells. It is a chronic disease that affects a patient's quality of life significantly and frequently requires long-term treatment. The study on sequential therapy with tazarotene 0.1% and calcitriol 0.0003% has not been tried so far; hence, we designed this study to compare the safety and efficacy of sequential therapy with tazarotene 0.1% cream and calcitriol 0.0003% ointment versus monotherapy in mild-to-moderate stable plaque psoriasis (SPP). The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of topical sequential treatment with tazarotene followed by calcitriol, topical calcitriol followed by tazarotene, tazarotene monotherapy, calcitriol monotherapy, and compare the safety and efficacy of the sequential therapies with monotherapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single center, prospective parallel-group, active control, randomized study of 16 weeks duration (treatment for 8 weeks and follow-up for 16 weeks), randomized to either of the four groups, i.e., tazarotene 0.1% for 4 weeks followed by calcitriol 0.0003% for 4 weeks or calcitriol 0.0003% for 4 weeks followed by tazarotene 0.1% for 4 weeks or tazarotene 0.1% for 8 weeks or calcitriol 0.0003% for 8 weeks. Both tazarotene and calcitriol were applied once daily in all the groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was no significant difference with regard to age and duration of illness among the four treatment groups. Statistically significant improvement was observed in erythema, scaling, and induration scores, and Physician`s global assessment scale at 8 weeks and 16 weeks as compared to baseline in tazarotene - calcitriol, calcitriol - tazarotene, and calcitriol versus tazarotene groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that topical treatment with tazarotene 0.1% and calcitriol 0.003% was efficacious in treating mild-to-moderate SPP as both sequential and monotherapy. However, topical treatment with tazarotene as monotherapy was the least efficacious.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"44-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_10_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_10_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:银屑病是一种导致皮肤细胞快速更替的自身免疫性疾病。它是一种慢性疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量,通常需要长期治疗。因此,我们设计了这项研究,以比较在轻度至中度稳定型斑块状银屑病(SPP)中使用 0.1% 他扎罗汀乳膏和 0.0003% 降钙三醇软膏进行序贯疗法与单一疗法的安全性和有效性。本研究的目的是比较他扎罗汀和降钙素三醇外用序贯疗法、他扎罗汀和降钙素三醇外用序贯疗法、他扎罗汀单药疗法和降钙素三醇单药疗法的安全性和有效性,并比较序贯疗法和单药疗法的安全性和有效性:该研究是一项单中心、前瞻性、平行组、主动对照、随机研究,为期16周(治疗8周,随访16周),随机分为四组,即他扎罗汀0.1%治疗4周,然后降钙素三醇0.0003%治疗4周,或降钙素三醇0.0003%治疗4周,然后他扎罗汀0.1%治疗4周,或他扎罗汀0.1%治疗8周,或降钙素三醇0.0003%治疗8周。所有治疗组的他扎罗汀和降钙素三醇均每天使用一次:结果:四个治疗组在年龄和病程方面没有明显差异。与基线相比,他扎罗汀-方解三醇组、方解三醇-他扎罗汀组和方解三醇对他扎罗汀组在8周和16周时的红斑、脱屑和压痕评分以及医生总体评估量表均有统计学意义的明显改善:本研究得出结论:他扎罗汀 0.1%和降钙素三醇 0.003% 的外用疗法对治疗轻度至中度 SPP 均有疗效。然而,他扎罗汀单药外用治疗的疗效最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Head-to-Head Comparison of Tazarotene and Calcitriol with or without Sequential Therapy in Mild-to-Moderate Psoriasis: A Randomized Open-label Study.

Objective: Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease that causes rapid turnover of skin cells. It is a chronic disease that affects a patient's quality of life significantly and frequently requires long-term treatment. The study on sequential therapy with tazarotene 0.1% and calcitriol 0.0003% has not been tried so far; hence, we designed this study to compare the safety and efficacy of sequential therapy with tazarotene 0.1% cream and calcitriol 0.0003% ointment versus monotherapy in mild-to-moderate stable plaque psoriasis (SPP). The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of topical sequential treatment with tazarotene followed by calcitriol, topical calcitriol followed by tazarotene, tazarotene monotherapy, calcitriol monotherapy, and compare the safety and efficacy of the sequential therapies with monotherapies.

Methods: The study was a single center, prospective parallel-group, active control, randomized study of 16 weeks duration (treatment for 8 weeks and follow-up for 16 weeks), randomized to either of the four groups, i.e., tazarotene 0.1% for 4 weeks followed by calcitriol 0.0003% for 4 weeks or calcitriol 0.0003% for 4 weeks followed by tazarotene 0.1% for 4 weeks or tazarotene 0.1% for 8 weeks or calcitriol 0.0003% for 8 weeks. Both tazarotene and calcitriol were applied once daily in all the groups.

Findings: There was no significant difference with regard to age and duration of illness among the four treatment groups. Statistically significant improvement was observed in erythema, scaling, and induration scores, and Physician`s global assessment scale at 8 weeks and 16 weeks as compared to baseline in tazarotene - calcitriol, calcitriol - tazarotene, and calcitriol versus tazarotene groups.

Conclusion: This study concluded that topical treatment with tazarotene 0.1% and calcitriol 0.003% was efficacious in treating mild-to-moderate SPP as both sequential and monotherapy. However, topical treatment with tazarotene as monotherapy was the least efficacious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信