为从业人员提供低资源环境下的气候智能型农业信息:互动工具回顾与分析

Daniel Lapidus, Kirsten Franzen, Caleb Milliken, Tyler Ovington, Jenny Frankel-Reed
{"title":"为从业人员提供低资源环境下的气候智能型农业信息:互动工具回顾与分析","authors":"Daniel Lapidus, Kirsten Franzen, Caleb Milliken, Tyler Ovington, Jenny Frankel-Reed","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.15299.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Agricultural producers in developing countries are uniquely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and have the least ability to adapt. While there is a growing consensus that more financing and resources are needed to address these impacts, information on how to direct funding and support adaptation is dispersed and difficult to find. Agricultural development stakeholders and investors can leverage increasingly available data from a range of online sources to inform their climate smart agriculture investments, but it is not always clear which data tools are easily accessible and which can support different aspects of their programs. Methods This analysis aims to inform stakeholders how different tools can inform their climate smart investments. Hundreds of interactive tools were reviewed from multiple sources and a set of criteria was developed to simplify and elucidate the landscape of resources available that support adaptation and GHG mitigation for agricultural producers in low-income countries. The search strategy included a literature review, discussions with key stakeholders, and a review of existing databases of tools (e.g., NDC Partnership Toolbox). Results Ultimately 29 tools were identified and compared in terms of how they address both climate risk, adaptation, and mitigation. The data sources behind the tools were also compared, and illustrative user groups were identified. Many valuable, easy-to-use tools exist offering non-climate experts’ opportunities to gain insights into the relationship between climate and small-scale farming systems. However, the tools available are insufficient and should not be relied upon exclusively for informing investments. Conclusions This review provides a valuable resource for those looking to inform investments and programming in small-scale agriculture. This set of tools can provide insights that can be leveraged in various ways for a wide range of users, but they also have considerable limitations. This review can help users understand how these tools can be useful and the types of additional context-specific and local information that should be sought.","PeriodicalId":504483,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":" 535","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing climate-smart agriculture in low resource settings for practitioners: A review and analysis of interactive tools\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Lapidus, Kirsten Franzen, Caleb Milliken, Tyler Ovington, Jenny Frankel-Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/gatesopenres.15299.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Agricultural producers in developing countries are uniquely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and have the least ability to adapt. While there is a growing consensus that more financing and resources are needed to address these impacts, information on how to direct funding and support adaptation is dispersed and difficult to find. Agricultural development stakeholders and investors can leverage increasingly available data from a range of online sources to inform their climate smart agriculture investments, but it is not always clear which data tools are easily accessible and which can support different aspects of their programs. Methods This analysis aims to inform stakeholders how different tools can inform their climate smart investments. Hundreds of interactive tools were reviewed from multiple sources and a set of criteria was developed to simplify and elucidate the landscape of resources available that support adaptation and GHG mitigation for agricultural producers in low-income countries. The search strategy included a literature review, discussions with key stakeholders, and a review of existing databases of tools (e.g., NDC Partnership Toolbox). Results Ultimately 29 tools were identified and compared in terms of how they address both climate risk, adaptation, and mitigation. The data sources behind the tools were also compared, and illustrative user groups were identified. Many valuable, easy-to-use tools exist offering non-climate experts’ opportunities to gain insights into the relationship between climate and small-scale farming systems. However, the tools available are insufficient and should not be relied upon exclusively for informing investments. Conclusions This review provides a valuable resource for those looking to inform investments and programming in small-scale agriculture. This set of tools can provide insights that can be leveraged in various ways for a wide range of users, but they also have considerable limitations. This review can help users understand how these tools can be useful and the types of additional context-specific and local information that should be sought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"volume\":\" 535\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15299.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15299.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景发展中国家的农业生产者特别容易受到气候变化的影响,而且适应能力最弱。虽然越来越多的人认为需要更多的资金和资源来应对这些影响,但有关如何引导资金和支持适应的信息却很分散,很难找到。农业发展利益相关者和投资者可以利用一系列在线来源提供的越来越多的数据,为其气候智能型农业投资提供信息,但并不总是很清楚哪些数据工具容易获取,哪些数据工具可以支持其计划的不同方面。方法 本分析旨在向利益相关者介绍不同工具如何为其气候智能型投资提供信息。我们从多个来源审查了数百种互动工具,并制定了一套标准,以简化和阐明支持低收入国家农业生产者适应气候变化和减缓温室气体排放的可用资源。搜索策略包括文献综述、与主要利益相关者的讨论以及对现有工具数据库(如 NDC 伙伴关系工具箱)的审查。结果最终确定了 29 种工具,并就这些工具如何应对气候风险、适应和减缓气候变化进行了比较。此外,还对工具背后的数据来源进行了比较,并确定了说明性用户群体。许多有价值、易于使用的工具为非气候专家提供了深入了解气候与小规模农业系统之间关系的机会。然而,现有的工具还不够充分,不应完全依赖这些工具为投资提供信息。结论 本综述为那些希望为小规模农业投资和规划提供信息的人提供了宝贵的资源。这套工具可以为广大用户提供以各种方式加以利用的见解,但它们也有相当大的局限性。本综述可帮助用户了解这些工具如何发挥作用,以及应寻求哪些类型的其他特定背景信息和当地信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing climate-smart agriculture in low resource settings for practitioners: A review and analysis of interactive tools
Background Agricultural producers in developing countries are uniquely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and have the least ability to adapt. While there is a growing consensus that more financing and resources are needed to address these impacts, information on how to direct funding and support adaptation is dispersed and difficult to find. Agricultural development stakeholders and investors can leverage increasingly available data from a range of online sources to inform their climate smart agriculture investments, but it is not always clear which data tools are easily accessible and which can support different aspects of their programs. Methods This analysis aims to inform stakeholders how different tools can inform their climate smart investments. Hundreds of interactive tools were reviewed from multiple sources and a set of criteria was developed to simplify and elucidate the landscape of resources available that support adaptation and GHG mitigation for agricultural producers in low-income countries. The search strategy included a literature review, discussions with key stakeholders, and a review of existing databases of tools (e.g., NDC Partnership Toolbox). Results Ultimately 29 tools were identified and compared in terms of how they address both climate risk, adaptation, and mitigation. The data sources behind the tools were also compared, and illustrative user groups were identified. Many valuable, easy-to-use tools exist offering non-climate experts’ opportunities to gain insights into the relationship between climate and small-scale farming systems. However, the tools available are insufficient and should not be relied upon exclusively for informing investments. Conclusions This review provides a valuable resource for those looking to inform investments and programming in small-scale agriculture. This set of tools can provide insights that can be leveraged in various ways for a wide range of users, but they also have considerable limitations. This review can help users understand how these tools can be useful and the types of additional context-specific and local information that should be sought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信