将常用便携式医疗传感器的性能与远程医疗系统的临床测试结果进行对比评估

Rafiqul Islam Maruf , Saori Tou , Rieko Izukura , Yoko Sato , Mariko Nishikitani , Kimiyo Kikuchi , Fumihiko Yokota , Subaru Ikeda , Rakibul Islam , Ashir Ahmed , Masashi Miyazaki , Naoki Nakashima
{"title":"将常用便携式医疗传感器的性能与远程医疗系统的临床测试结果进行对比评估","authors":"Rafiqul Islam Maruf ,&nbsp;Saori Tou ,&nbsp;Rieko Izukura ,&nbsp;Yoko Sato ,&nbsp;Mariko Nishikitani ,&nbsp;Kimiyo Kikuchi ,&nbsp;Fumihiko Yokota ,&nbsp;Subaru Ikeda ,&nbsp;Rakibul Islam ,&nbsp;Ashir Ahmed ,&nbsp;Masashi Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Naoki Nakashima","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>One of the primary challenges faced by telehealth systems is the accurate transmission of patient information to remote doctors. In this context, portable medical sensors deployed at the remote patients' end play a crucial role in measuring vital information. There are many sensors available in the market. However, the accuracy of the sensors has been always a concern. The objective of this study is to verify different sensors and create awareness for using accurate sensors to avoid misdiagnosis for the patients’ safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study considered the test result of a Japanese clinical pathology laboratory as the reference gold standard. The clinical pathology laboratory uses 1) Hexokinase UV method for blood glucose, 2) Enzymatic Determination method for cholesterol, 3) Automatic Analyzer (EDTA-2 K) of Hemoglobin, and 4) Uricase POD method for uric acid. To assess the performance of a medical sensor, its test results were compared to the gold standard test results obtained from the laboratory using the same sample. A Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) threshold of less than 0.2 was established as the criterion for determining whether the medical sensor's performance fell within an acceptable range.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the eight most commonly used blood glucose devices in the Asian market, only one device was deemed acceptable with NRMSE less than 0.2. However, all four devices found in the Japanese market showed their acceptability. In the case of cholesterol, hemoglobin, and uric acid devices, only a limited number of items were available in Asian markets. Some of the hemoglobin and uric acid devices were found to be somewhat acceptable, while all the cholesterol sensors were found erroneous.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study has clearly shown the issues with the portable medical sensors and recommends the device approval authority of each country to approve sales of the quality sensors only for patients’ safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000144/pdfft?md5=6cb858a0f60b29a1fc21629928f765b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990024000144-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the commonly used portable medical sensors performance in comparison to clinical test results for telehealth systems\",\"authors\":\"Rafiqul Islam Maruf ,&nbsp;Saori Tou ,&nbsp;Rieko Izukura ,&nbsp;Yoko Sato ,&nbsp;Mariko Nishikitani ,&nbsp;Kimiyo Kikuchi ,&nbsp;Fumihiko Yokota ,&nbsp;Subaru Ikeda ,&nbsp;Rakibul Islam ,&nbsp;Ashir Ahmed ,&nbsp;Masashi Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Naoki Nakashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p>One of the primary challenges faced by telehealth systems is the accurate transmission of patient information to remote doctors. In this context, portable medical sensors deployed at the remote patients' end play a crucial role in measuring vital information. There are many sensors available in the market. However, the accuracy of the sensors has been always a concern. The objective of this study is to verify different sensors and create awareness for using accurate sensors to avoid misdiagnosis for the patients’ safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study considered the test result of a Japanese clinical pathology laboratory as the reference gold standard. The clinical pathology laboratory uses 1) Hexokinase UV method for blood glucose, 2) Enzymatic Determination method for cholesterol, 3) Automatic Analyzer (EDTA-2 K) of Hemoglobin, and 4) Uricase POD method for uric acid. To assess the performance of a medical sensor, its test results were compared to the gold standard test results obtained from the laboratory using the same sample. A Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) threshold of less than 0.2 was established as the criterion for determining whether the medical sensor's performance fell within an acceptable range.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the eight most commonly used blood glucose devices in the Asian market, only one device was deemed acceptable with NRMSE less than 0.2. However, all four devices found in the Japanese market showed their acceptability. In the case of cholesterol, hemoglobin, and uric acid devices, only a limited number of items were available in Asian markets. Some of the hemoglobin and uric acid devices were found to be somewhat acceptable, while all the cholesterol sensors were found erroneous.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study has clearly shown the issues with the portable medical sensors and recommends the device approval authority of each country to approve sales of the quality sensors only for patients’ safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000144/pdfft?md5=6cb858a0f60b29a1fc21629928f765b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990024000144-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目标 远程医疗系统面临的主要挑战之一是向远程医生准确传输病人信息。在这种情况下,部署在远程患者端的便携式医疗传感器在测量重要信息方面发挥着至关重要的作用。市场上有许多传感器。然而,传感器的准确性一直是个问题。本研究的目的是验证不同的传感器,提高人们使用准确传感器的意识,以避免误诊,保障患者的安全。该临床病理实验室使用 1) 紫外光六磷酸酶法检测血糖,2) 酶法测定胆固醇,3) 自动分析仪(EDTA-2 K)检测血红蛋白,4) 尿酸酶 POD 法检测尿酸。为评估医疗传感器的性能,将其测试结果与实验室使用相同样本获得的金标准测试结果进行比较。结果在亚洲市场最常用的八种血糖设备中,只有一种设备的归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)小于 0.2,被认为是可以接受的。然而,日本市场上的所有四种血糖仪都显示出其可接受性。至于胆固醇、血红蛋白和尿酸检测仪,亚洲市场上只有少量产品。这项研究清楚地表明了便携式医疗传感器存在的问题,建议各国的设备审批机构只批准销售高质量的传感器,以确保患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of the commonly used portable medical sensors performance in comparison to clinical test results for telehealth systems

Background and Objective

One of the primary challenges faced by telehealth systems is the accurate transmission of patient information to remote doctors. In this context, portable medical sensors deployed at the remote patients' end play a crucial role in measuring vital information. There are many sensors available in the market. However, the accuracy of the sensors has been always a concern. The objective of this study is to verify different sensors and create awareness for using accurate sensors to avoid misdiagnosis for the patients’ safety.

Methods

This study considered the test result of a Japanese clinical pathology laboratory as the reference gold standard. The clinical pathology laboratory uses 1) Hexokinase UV method for blood glucose, 2) Enzymatic Determination method for cholesterol, 3) Automatic Analyzer (EDTA-2 K) of Hemoglobin, and 4) Uricase POD method for uric acid. To assess the performance of a medical sensor, its test results were compared to the gold standard test results obtained from the laboratory using the same sample. A Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) threshold of less than 0.2 was established as the criterion for determining whether the medical sensor's performance fell within an acceptable range.

Results

Among the eight most commonly used blood glucose devices in the Asian market, only one device was deemed acceptable with NRMSE less than 0.2. However, all four devices found in the Japanese market showed their acceptability. In the case of cholesterol, hemoglobin, and uric acid devices, only a limited number of items were available in Asian markets. Some of the hemoglobin and uric acid devices were found to be somewhat acceptable, while all the cholesterol sensors were found erroneous.

Conclusions

This study has clearly shown the issues with the portable medical sensors and recommends the device approval authority of each country to approve sales of the quality sensors only for patients’ safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信