自由、可选、适应性强"：橡树国家学院与教师选择的管理

Forum Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.10

P. Yarker

{"title":"自由、可选、适应性强\"：橡树国家学院与教师选择的管理","authors":"P. Yarker","doi":"10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article opens with two contrasting accounts of the provenance of Oak National Academy before tracing Oak's controversial development as a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Education as a means (it is argued) of extending control not only over what teachers\n teach but over how they may teach it.","PeriodicalId":53229,"journal":{"name":"Forum","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Free, optional and adaptable': Oak National Academy and the governing of teachers' choices\",\"authors\":\"P. Yarker\",\"doi\":\"10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article opens with two contrasting accounts of the provenance of Oak National Academy before tracing Oak's controversial development as a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Education as a means (it is argued) of extending control not only over what teachers\\n teach but over how they may teach it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先对奥克国家学院的起源进行了两种截然不同的描述，然后追溯了奥克作为一个由教育部赞助的非部门公共机构备受争议的发展历程，（本文认为）这不仅是对教师教学内容的控制，也是对教师教学方式的控制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

'Free, optional and adaptable': Oak National Academy and the governing of teachers' choices

This article opens with two contrasting accounts of the provenance of Oak National Academy before tracing Oak's controversial development as a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Education as a means (it is argued) of extending control not only over what teachers teach but over how they may teach it.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Forum

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks