MaliceSpotter:利用机器学习实现网络安全革命,提高抵御网络钓鱼的能力

Shwetambari Borade, Parshva Chetan Doshi, Darsh Bhavesh Patel
{"title":"MaliceSpotter:利用机器学习实现网络安全革命,提高抵御网络钓鱼的能力","authors":"Shwetambari Borade, Parshva Chetan Doshi, Darsh Bhavesh Patel","doi":"10.17485/ijst/v17i10.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To enhance cyber security by implementing advanced algorithms to swiftly identify and neutralize phishing threats. Also, to bolster user protection, fortify data integrity, and ensure a resilient defense against evolving cyber threats. Methods: MaliceSpotter aims in classifying user-entered URLs by analysing 28 features, using algorithms like Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and KNN, combined via a Voting Classifier. Dataset on Kaggle provides diverse samples for evaluation. This methodology's unique aspects include multiple algorithm integration and the utilization of Kaggle as a data source. Findings: MaliceSpotter demonstrates a commendable accuracy of 95%, effectively classifying input URLs as phishing or legitimate. The system's uniqueness lies in its provision of a detailed report on URL behavior, facilitating informed decision-making. The implementation of ensemble learning is notable, particularly the introduction of the Voting Classifier. This approach leverages various algorithms, successfully incorporating bagging and voting concepts. Through the Voting Classifier, MaliceSpotter gains insights into the working of machine learning algorithms, enhancing the scrutiny of URL behavior. This innovative feature sets MaliceSpotter apart, offering a nuanced perspective on the reliability of URLs through the collective input of diverse algorithms. Novelty: MaliceSpotter uniquely combines diverse algorithms, leveraging a voting classifier for robust results. Continuously updating in real time, it meticulously dissects URLs into 28 parts, ensuring thorough scrutiny and effective detection. Keywords: Phishing, Machine Learning, Web Security, Voting Classifier, Bagging","PeriodicalId":13296,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of science and technology","volume":"116 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MaliceSpotter: Revolutionizing Cyber Security with Machine Learning for Phishing Resilience\",\"authors\":\"Shwetambari Borade, Parshva Chetan Doshi, Darsh Bhavesh Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.17485/ijst/v17i10.148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To enhance cyber security by implementing advanced algorithms to swiftly identify and neutralize phishing threats. Also, to bolster user protection, fortify data integrity, and ensure a resilient defense against evolving cyber threats. Methods: MaliceSpotter aims in classifying user-entered URLs by analysing 28 features, using algorithms like Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and KNN, combined via a Voting Classifier. Dataset on Kaggle provides diverse samples for evaluation. This methodology's unique aspects include multiple algorithm integration and the utilization of Kaggle as a data source. Findings: MaliceSpotter demonstrates a commendable accuracy of 95%, effectively classifying input URLs as phishing or legitimate. The system's uniqueness lies in its provision of a detailed report on URL behavior, facilitating informed decision-making. The implementation of ensemble learning is notable, particularly the introduction of the Voting Classifier. This approach leverages various algorithms, successfully incorporating bagging and voting concepts. Through the Voting Classifier, MaliceSpotter gains insights into the working of machine learning algorithms, enhancing the scrutiny of URL behavior. This innovative feature sets MaliceSpotter apart, offering a nuanced perspective on the reliability of URLs through the collective input of diverse algorithms. Novelty: MaliceSpotter uniquely combines diverse algorithms, leveraging a voting classifier for robust results. Continuously updating in real time, it meticulously dissects URLs into 28 parts, ensuring thorough scrutiny and effective detection. Keywords: Phishing, Machine Learning, Web Security, Voting Classifier, Bagging\",\"PeriodicalId\":13296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of science and technology\",\"volume\":\"116 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v17i10.148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v17i10.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:通过采用先进的算法来迅速识别和消除网络钓鱼威胁,从而加强网络安全。同时,加强用户保护,强化数据完整性,确保对不断演变的网络威胁进行弹性防御。方法:MaliceSpotter 通过分析 28 个特征,使用逻辑回归、随机森林和 KNN 等算法,结合投票分类器,对用户输入的 URL 进行分类。Kaggle 上的数据集为评估提供了多种样本。该方法的独特之处在于整合了多种算法,并利用 Kaggle 作为数据源。研究结果MaliceSpotter 的准确率高达 95%,能有效地将输入 URL 分为网络钓鱼或合法 URL。该系统的独特之处在于提供了有关 URL 行为的详细报告,有助于做出明智的决策。值得注意的是,该系统采用了集合学习方法,特别是引入了投票分类器。这种方法利用了各种算法,成功地融合了套袋和投票概念。通过投票分类器,MaliceSpotter 可以深入了解机器学习算法的工作原理,从而加强对 URL 行为的审查。这一创新功能使 MaliceSpotter 脱颖而出,通过不同算法的集体输入,为 URL 的可靠性提供了一个细致入微的视角。新颖性:MaliceSpotter 将多种算法独特地结合在一起,利用投票分类器获得可靠的结果。它不断进行实时更新,将 URL 分成 28 个部分,确保彻底审查和有效检测。关键词网络钓鱼 机器学习 网络安全 投票分类器 Bagging
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MaliceSpotter: Revolutionizing Cyber Security with Machine Learning for Phishing Resilience
Objectives: To enhance cyber security by implementing advanced algorithms to swiftly identify and neutralize phishing threats. Also, to bolster user protection, fortify data integrity, and ensure a resilient defense against evolving cyber threats. Methods: MaliceSpotter aims in classifying user-entered URLs by analysing 28 features, using algorithms like Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and KNN, combined via a Voting Classifier. Dataset on Kaggle provides diverse samples for evaluation. This methodology's unique aspects include multiple algorithm integration and the utilization of Kaggle as a data source. Findings: MaliceSpotter demonstrates a commendable accuracy of 95%, effectively classifying input URLs as phishing or legitimate. The system's uniqueness lies in its provision of a detailed report on URL behavior, facilitating informed decision-making. The implementation of ensemble learning is notable, particularly the introduction of the Voting Classifier. This approach leverages various algorithms, successfully incorporating bagging and voting concepts. Through the Voting Classifier, MaliceSpotter gains insights into the working of machine learning algorithms, enhancing the scrutiny of URL behavior. This innovative feature sets MaliceSpotter apart, offering a nuanced perspective on the reliability of URLs through the collective input of diverse algorithms. Novelty: MaliceSpotter uniquely combines diverse algorithms, leveraging a voting classifier for robust results. Continuously updating in real time, it meticulously dissects URLs into 28 parts, ensuring thorough scrutiny and effective detection. Keywords: Phishing, Machine Learning, Web Security, Voting Classifier, Bagging
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信