在役焊接和感应预热的多物理场仿真:第二部分

Kauê Correa Riffel, R. H. Gonçalves e Silva, Antonio Ramirez, Andres FABRICIO FISCHDICK ACUNA, G. Dalpiaz, Marcelo TORRES PIZA PAES
{"title":"在役焊接和感应预热的多物理场仿真:第二部分","authors":"Kauê Correa Riffel, R. H. Gonçalves e Silva, Antonio Ramirez, Andres FABRICIO FISCHDICK ACUNA, G. Dalpiaz, Marcelo TORRES PIZA PAES","doi":"10.29391/2024.103.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.","PeriodicalId":509696,"journal":{"name":"Welding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphysics Simulation of In-Service Welding and Induction Preheating: Part 2\",\"authors\":\"Kauê Correa Riffel, R. H. Gonçalves e Silva, Antonio Ramirez, Andres FABRICIO FISCHDICK ACUNA, G. Dalpiaz, Marcelo TORRES PIZA PAES\",\"doi\":\"10.29391/2024.103.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welding Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welding Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用多物理场有限元分析(FEA)进行了在役焊接模拟。通过将温度和热循环等计算数据与在连接水循环的碳钢管上进行的焊接实验结果进行比较,验证了这些数据的正确性。采用 GMAW-P 焊接工艺,在有感应预热和无感应预热辅助的情况下,对两种在役焊接情况进行了测试。焊缝熔融区宏观图与模拟模型非常精确地吻合。模拟和实验熔融区之间的高度一致在峰值温度上产生的最大误差为 1%,而在冷却曲线上,较低温度下的误差约为 10%。在 CGHAZ 内的焊趾处出现了一个硬度较高的区域,在功率为 35 kW 的情况下,感应预热的最高温度为 90°C。感应预热将最大硬度从 390 HV 降至 339 HV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiphysics Simulation of In-Service Welding and Induction Preheating: Part 2
In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信