Kauê Correa Riffel, R. H. Gonçalves e Silva, Antonio Ramirez, Andres FABRICIO FISCHDICK ACUNA, G. Dalpiaz, Marcelo TORRES PIZA PAES
{"title":"在役焊接和感应预热的多物理场仿真:第二部分","authors":"Kauê Correa Riffel, R. H. Gonçalves e Silva, Antonio Ramirez, Andres FABRICIO FISCHDICK ACUNA, G. Dalpiaz, Marcelo TORRES PIZA PAES","doi":"10.29391/2024.103.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.","PeriodicalId":509696,"journal":{"name":"Welding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphysics Simulation of In-Service Welding and Induction Preheating: Part 2\",\"authors\":\"Kauê Correa Riffel, R. H. Gonçalves e Silva, Antonio Ramirez, Andres FABRICIO FISCHDICK ACUNA, G. Dalpiaz, Marcelo TORRES PIZA PAES\",\"doi\":\"10.29391/2024.103.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welding Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welding Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiphysics Simulation of In-Service Welding and Induction Preheating: Part 2
In-service welding simulations were carried out using a multiphysics finite element analysis (FEA). Calculated data as temperature and thermal cycles were validated by comparing them with experimental welding results carried out in a carbon steel pipe attached to a water loop. Two in-service welding cases were tested using the GMAW-P process with and without the assistance of induction preheating. The molten zone of weld macrographs and the simulated models were matched with excellent accuracy. The great agreement between the simulation and experimental molten zone generated a maximum error in the peak temperature of 1%, while in the cooling curve, the error was about 10% at lower temperatures. A higher hardness zone appeared in the weld’s toe within the CGHAZ, where the maximum induction preheating temperature achieved was 90°C with a power of 35 kW. Induction preheating reduced the maximum hardness from 390 HV to 339 HV.