西班牙重症监护病房对维持生命治疗的限制:对 ETHICUS II 研究的分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ángel Estella , Carolina Lagares , María José Furones , Pilar Martínez López , Noelia Isabel Lázaro Martín , Belén Estebánez , Jose Manuel Gómez García , Olga Rubio , Bárbara Vidal Tejedor , Laura Galarza , Manuel Palomo Navarro , Vicent López Camps , Mari Cruz Martín , Juan Carlos Montejo , Alexander Avidan , Charles Sprung , Grupo de Trabajo de Bioética de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC)
{"title":"西班牙重症监护病房对维持生命治疗的限制:对 ETHICUS II 研究的分析","authors":"Ángel Estella ,&nbsp;Carolina Lagares ,&nbsp;María José Furones ,&nbsp;Pilar Martínez López ,&nbsp;Noelia Isabel Lázaro Martín ,&nbsp;Belén Estebánez ,&nbsp;Jose Manuel Gómez García ,&nbsp;Olga Rubio ,&nbsp;Bárbara Vidal Tejedor ,&nbsp;Laura Galarza ,&nbsp;Manuel Palomo Navarro ,&nbsp;Vicent López Camps ,&nbsp;Mari Cruz Martín ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Montejo ,&nbsp;Alexander Avidan ,&nbsp;Charles Sprung ,&nbsp;Grupo de Trabajo de Bioética de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC)","doi":"10.1016/j.medin.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study is to describe the results of Spanish ICUs in ETHICUS II study.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Planned substudy of patients from ETHICUS II study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>12 Spanish ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Patients or participants</h3><p>Patients admitted to Spanish ICU who died or in whom a limitation of life-sustaining treatment (LLST) was decided during a recruitment period of 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Follow-up of patients was performed until discharge from the ICU and 2 months after the decision of LLST or death.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Demographic characteristics, clinical profile, type of decision of LLST, time and form in which it was adopted. Patients were classified into 4 categories according to the ETHICUS II study protocol: withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy, active shortening of the dying process, failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patients with brain death.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 795 patients were analyzed; 129 patients died after CPR, 129 developed brain death. LLST was decided in 537 patients, 485 died in the ICU, 90.3%. The mean age was 66.19 years<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.36, 63.8% of male patients. In 221 (41%) it was decided to withdraw life-sustaining treatments and in 316(59%) withholding life-sustaining treatments. Nineteen patients (2.38%) had advance living directives.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The predominant clinical profile when LTSV was established was male patients over 65 years with mostly cardiovascular comorbidity.</p><p>We observed that survival was higher in LLST decisions involving withholding of treatments compared to those in which withdrawal was decided.</p><p>Spain has played a leading role in both patient and ICU recruitment participating in this worldwide multicenter study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49268,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Intensiva","volume":"48 5","pages":"Pages 247-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitación de tratamientos de soporte vital en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos españolas: análisis del estudio ETHICUS II\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Estella ,&nbsp;Carolina Lagares ,&nbsp;María José Furones ,&nbsp;Pilar Martínez López ,&nbsp;Noelia Isabel Lázaro Martín ,&nbsp;Belén Estebánez ,&nbsp;Jose Manuel Gómez García ,&nbsp;Olga Rubio ,&nbsp;Bárbara Vidal Tejedor ,&nbsp;Laura Galarza ,&nbsp;Manuel Palomo Navarro ,&nbsp;Vicent López Camps ,&nbsp;Mari Cruz Martín ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Montejo ,&nbsp;Alexander Avidan ,&nbsp;Charles Sprung ,&nbsp;Grupo de Trabajo de Bioética de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medin.2024.01.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study is to describe the results of Spanish ICUs in ETHICUS II study.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Planned substudy of patients from ETHICUS II study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>12 Spanish ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Patients or participants</h3><p>Patients admitted to Spanish ICU who died or in whom a limitation of life-sustaining treatment (LLST) was decided during a recruitment period of 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Follow-up of patients was performed until discharge from the ICU and 2 months after the decision of LLST or death.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Demographic characteristics, clinical profile, type of decision of LLST, time and form in which it was adopted. Patients were classified into 4 categories according to the ETHICUS II study protocol: withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy, active shortening of the dying process, failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patients with brain death.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 795 patients were analyzed; 129 patients died after CPR, 129 developed brain death. LLST was decided in 537 patients, 485 died in the ICU, 90.3%. The mean age was 66.19 years<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.36, 63.8% of male patients. In 221 (41%) it was decided to withdraw life-sustaining treatments and in 316(59%) withholding life-sustaining treatments. Nineteen patients (2.38%) had advance living directives.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The predominant clinical profile when LTSV was established was male patients over 65 years with mostly cardiovascular comorbidity.</p><p>We observed that survival was higher in LLST decisions involving withholding of treatments compared to those in which withdrawal was decided.</p><p>Spain has played a leading role in both patient and ICU recruitment participating in this worldwide multicenter study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Intensiva\",\"volume\":\"48 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 247-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569124000615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569124000615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者或参与者西班牙重症监护病房收治的患者,在招募期间的 6 个月内死亡或决定限制维持生命治疗(LLST)。主要关注变量人口统计学特征、临床特征、LLST决定的类型、时间和采取的形式。根据 ETHICUS II 研究方案,患者被分为 4 类:暂停或撤消维持生命疗法、主动缩短死亡过程、心肺复苏失败和脑死亡患者。结果共分析了 795 名患者;129 名患者在心肺复苏后死亡,129 名患者出现脑死亡。有 537 名患者决定接受 LLST,其中 485 人死于重症监护室,占 90.3%。平均年龄为 66.19 岁 ± 14.36 岁,男性患者占 63.8%。221例(41%)患者决定撤销维持生命的治疗,316例(59%)患者决定暂停维持生命的治疗。19名患者(2.38%)有预先的生前预嘱。我们观察到,与决定撤消治疗的患者相比,决定暂停治疗的 LLST 患者存活率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limitación de tratamientos de soporte vital en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos españolas: análisis del estudio ETHICUS II

Objective

The aim of this study is to describe the results of Spanish ICUs in ETHICUS II study.

Design

Planned substudy of patients from ETHICUS II study.

Setting

12 Spanish ICU.

Patients or participants

Patients admitted to Spanish ICU who died or in whom a limitation of life-sustaining treatment (LLST) was decided during a recruitment period of 6 months.

Interventions

Follow-up of patients was performed until discharge from the ICU and 2 months after the decision of LLST or death.

Main variables of interest

Demographic characteristics, clinical profile, type of decision of LLST, time and form in which it was adopted. Patients were classified into 4 categories according to the ETHICUS II study protocol: withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy, active shortening of the dying process, failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patients with brain death.

Results

A total of 795 patients were analyzed; 129 patients died after CPR, 129 developed brain death. LLST was decided in 537 patients, 485 died in the ICU, 90.3%. The mean age was 66.19 years ± 14.36, 63.8% of male patients. In 221 (41%) it was decided to withdraw life-sustaining treatments and in 316(59%) withholding life-sustaining treatments. Nineteen patients (2.38%) had advance living directives.

Conclusions

The predominant clinical profile when LTSV was established was male patients over 65 years with mostly cardiovascular comorbidity.

We observed that survival was higher in LLST decisions involving withholding of treatments compared to those in which withdrawal was decided.

Spain has played a leading role in both patient and ICU recruitment participating in this worldwide multicenter study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Intensiva
Medicina Intensiva CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Intensiva is the journal of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and of Pan American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Medicina Intensiva has become the reference publication in Spanish in its field. The journal mainly publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Clinical Notes, Consensus Documents, Images, and other information relevant to the specialty. All works go through a rigorous selection process. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages. The journal follows the publication requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信