与生产活动和水资源环境管理有关的含水层污染风险:文献计量分析和趋势

G. Y. F. Yepes, Angela María Alzate Álvarez, Paola Vásquez Cardona, Luis Alberto Vargas Marín, Erika Juliana Aldana Arcila, Fredy E. Hoyos
{"title":"与生产活动和水资源环境管理有关的含水层污染风险:文献计量分析和趋势","authors":"G. Y. F. Yepes, Angela María Alzate Álvarez, Paola Vásquez Cardona, Luis Alberto Vargas Marín, Erika Juliana Aldana Arcila, Fredy E. Hoyos","doi":"10.11591/ijpeds.v15.i1.pp577-590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Its analyzed the evolution and trends of the concept, and studies the models used to know the vulnerability and risk of aquifers and strategies for their management. The methodological process starts from questions guiding the knowledge of research trends, authors among others to proceed to carry out the analyses from the databases of Scopus, Web of Science and Dimensions. VOSviewer and Bibliometric (Rstudio) software were used. Among the most representative results, it was found that most of the research to determine the risk of aquifer contamination is focused on different models such as improved flux prototypes for NO2 emission from agriculture (IPNOA), pollutant origin surcharge hydraulically (POSH), intrinsic vulnerability methods ground water occurrence, overall aquifer class, depth to groundwater (GOD), depth recharge, aquifer, soil, topography, impact, hydraulic conductivity (DRASTIC), substance, infiltration, not saturated, type of coverage, topographic surface, conductivity (SINTACS) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) among others. Different models have been used that integrate both hydrological and hydro-geological aspects as well as social aspects including fundamental rights, other models such as the diffuse model, which has had better results in its application, the gaps in the research, are especially focused on conducting holistic research when assessing the risk of these dynamical systems.","PeriodicalId":355274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS)","volume":"82 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk to pollution of aquifers associated with productive activities and environmental management of water resources: bibliometric analysis and trends\",\"authors\":\"G. Y. F. Yepes, Angela María Alzate Álvarez, Paola Vásquez Cardona, Luis Alberto Vargas Marín, Erika Juliana Aldana Arcila, Fredy E. Hoyos\",\"doi\":\"10.11591/ijpeds.v15.i1.pp577-590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Its analyzed the evolution and trends of the concept, and studies the models used to know the vulnerability and risk of aquifers and strategies for their management. The methodological process starts from questions guiding the knowledge of research trends, authors among others to proceed to carry out the analyses from the databases of Scopus, Web of Science and Dimensions. VOSviewer and Bibliometric (Rstudio) software were used. Among the most representative results, it was found that most of the research to determine the risk of aquifer contamination is focused on different models such as improved flux prototypes for NO2 emission from agriculture (IPNOA), pollutant origin surcharge hydraulically (POSH), intrinsic vulnerability methods ground water occurrence, overall aquifer class, depth to groundwater (GOD), depth recharge, aquifer, soil, topography, impact, hydraulic conductivity (DRASTIC), substance, infiltration, not saturated, type of coverage, topographic surface, conductivity (SINTACS) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) among others. Different models have been used that integrate both hydrological and hydro-geological aspects as well as social aspects including fundamental rights, other models such as the diffuse model, which has had better results in its application, the gaps in the research, are especially focused on conducting holistic research when assessing the risk of these dynamical systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS)\",\"volume\":\"82 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v15.i1.pp577-590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v15.i1.pp577-590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

它分析了这一概念的演变和趋势,研究了用于了解含水层的脆弱性和风险及其管理策略的模型。方法论过程从指导了解研究趋势的问题开始,作者等从 Scopus、Web of Science 和 Dimensions 数据库中进行分析。使用了 VOSviewer 和 Bibliometric (Rstudio) 软件。在最具代表性的结果中,发现大多数确定含水层污染风险的研究都集中在不同的模型上,如改进的农业二氧化氮排放通量原型(IPNOA)、污染物来源水力附加(POSH)、地下水发生的内在脆弱性方法、在这些模型中,还包括含水层、土壤、地形、影响、水力传导性 (DRASTIC)、物质、渗透、未饱和、覆盖类型、地形表面、传导性 (SINTACS) 和氟氯化碳 (CFC)。已经使用了不同的模型,将水文和水文地质方面以及包括基本权利在内的社会方面结合在一起,其他模型,如扩散模型,在应用中取得了更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk to pollution of aquifers associated with productive activities and environmental management of water resources: bibliometric analysis and trends
Its analyzed the evolution and trends of the concept, and studies the models used to know the vulnerability and risk of aquifers and strategies for their management. The methodological process starts from questions guiding the knowledge of research trends, authors among others to proceed to carry out the analyses from the databases of Scopus, Web of Science and Dimensions. VOSviewer and Bibliometric (Rstudio) software were used. Among the most representative results, it was found that most of the research to determine the risk of aquifer contamination is focused on different models such as improved flux prototypes for NO2 emission from agriculture (IPNOA), pollutant origin surcharge hydraulically (POSH), intrinsic vulnerability methods ground water occurrence, overall aquifer class, depth to groundwater (GOD), depth recharge, aquifer, soil, topography, impact, hydraulic conductivity (DRASTIC), substance, infiltration, not saturated, type of coverage, topographic surface, conductivity (SINTACS) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) among others. Different models have been used that integrate both hydrological and hydro-geological aspects as well as social aspects including fundamental rights, other models such as the diffuse model, which has had better results in its application, the gaps in the research, are especially focused on conducting holistic research when assessing the risk of these dynamical systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信