甲状腺切除术后放射性碘消融可安全放弃或推迟I期乳头状甲状腺癌低风险组患者的治疗:一项前瞻性观察研究

S.M. Cherenko, A.Yu. Glagolieva, D.E. Makhmudov
{"title":"甲状腺切除术后放射性碘消融可安全放弃或推迟I期乳头状甲状腺癌低风险组患者的治疗:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"S.M. Cherenko, A.Yu. Glagolieva, D.E. Makhmudov","doi":"10.22141/2224-0721.20.1.2024.1351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The European Thyroid Association consensus for the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (2006) suggested to avoid radioactive iodine (RAI) after thyroidectomy in patients with unifocal microcarcinoma (≤ 1 cm) with no extension beyond the thyroid capsule and without lymph node metastases. As the new data was collected and the risk stratification was revised, in 2022 the same recommendation was expanded to the patients with microcarcinoma and central neck lymph node involvement. The American Thyroid Association guidelines (2015) advocated no RAI ablation after hemi- or total thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer less than 1 cm with 5 and less micrometastases up to 2 mm in central neck lymph nodes as this strategy has no negative impact on the disease prognosis. In low-risk patients, no sufficient evidence of the obligatory postsurgical radioiodine ablation has been yet demonstrated. The aim of our study was to reveal whether RAI after thyroidectomy can be abandoned or postponed until the disease progression is confirmed in low-risk patients. Materials and methods. Two groups of patients (30 per group, 60 in total) with papillary microcarcinoma Т1N1a (5 and less level VI micrometastases up to 2 mm) were observed during a 5-year follow-up. In the first group, patients received 100 mCi (3.75 GBq) I131 shortly after total thyroidectomy while in the second group, postponed RAI was applied when progression signs were observed (elevated serum thyroglobulin level and US/CT suspected findings) after thyroid surgery. Results. After 5 years, no significant difference between groups was observed regarding post-RAI local recurrences (one in the first group and two in the second group) and/or distant metastases (t-test, p = 0.58). All cases of neck recurrences were treated with subsequent surgical excision, with no new data of progression within the specified follow-up. Conclusions. RAI adjuvant therapy for papillary thyroid carcinoma Т1N1a may not be necessary for patients with small number of level VI micrometastases. Local and distant metastases revealed during the careful follow-up by thyroglobulin level elevation and when using visualization techniques can be effectively treated with postponed RAI therapy and/or surgery.","PeriodicalId":13962,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (Ukraine)","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radioiodine ablation after thyroidectomy could be safely abandoned or postponed in selected stage I papillary thyroid carcinoma patients of low-risk group: an observational prospective study\",\"authors\":\"S.M. Cherenko, A.Yu. Glagolieva, D.E. Makhmudov\",\"doi\":\"10.22141/2224-0721.20.1.2024.1351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The European Thyroid Association consensus for the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (2006) suggested to avoid radioactive iodine (RAI) after thyroidectomy in patients with unifocal microcarcinoma (≤ 1 cm) with no extension beyond the thyroid capsule and without lymph node metastases. As the new data was collected and the risk stratification was revised, in 2022 the same recommendation was expanded to the patients with microcarcinoma and central neck lymph node involvement. The American Thyroid Association guidelines (2015) advocated no RAI ablation after hemi- or total thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer less than 1 cm with 5 and less micrometastases up to 2 mm in central neck lymph nodes as this strategy has no negative impact on the disease prognosis. In low-risk patients, no sufficient evidence of the obligatory postsurgical radioiodine ablation has been yet demonstrated. The aim of our study was to reveal whether RAI after thyroidectomy can be abandoned or postponed until the disease progression is confirmed in low-risk patients. Materials and methods. Two groups of patients (30 per group, 60 in total) with papillary microcarcinoma Т1N1a (5 and less level VI micrometastases up to 2 mm) were observed during a 5-year follow-up. In the first group, patients received 100 mCi (3.75 GBq) I131 shortly after total thyroidectomy while in the second group, postponed RAI was applied when progression signs were observed (elevated serum thyroglobulin level and US/CT suspected findings) after thyroid surgery. Results. After 5 years, no significant difference between groups was observed regarding post-RAI local recurrences (one in the first group and two in the second group) and/or distant metastases (t-test, p = 0.58). All cases of neck recurrences were treated with subsequent surgical excision, with no new data of progression within the specified follow-up. Conclusions. RAI adjuvant therapy for papillary thyroid carcinoma Т1N1a may not be necessary for patients with small number of level VI micrometastases. Local and distant metastases revealed during the careful follow-up by thyroglobulin level elevation and when using visualization techniques can be effectively treated with postponed RAI therapy and/or surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (Ukraine)\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (Ukraine)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0721.20.1.2024.1351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (Ukraine)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0721.20.1.2024.1351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。欧洲甲状腺协会关于分化型甲状腺癌治疗的共识(2006年)建议,对于单灶微小癌(≤1厘米)且未扩展至甲状腺囊外、无淋巴结转移的患者,甲状腺切除术后应避免使用放射性碘(RAI)。随着新数据的收集和风险分层的修订,2022年,同样的建议扩大到微小癌和颈部中央淋巴结受累的患者。美国甲状腺协会指南(2015年)主张,对于甲状腺癌小于1厘米、颈部中央淋巴结有5个或更少2毫米以下微转移灶的患者,在半甲状腺或全甲状腺切除术后不进行RAI消融,因为这种策略对疾病预后没有负面影响。对于低危患者,目前还没有充分证据表明手术后必须进行放射性碘消融。我们的研究旨在揭示甲状腺切除术后是否可以放弃 RAI 或推迟 RAI,直至低危患者的疾病进展得到确认。材料和方法。我们对两组Т1N1a乳头状微癌患者(每组30人,共60人)进行了为期5年的随访观察。第一组患者在甲状腺全切除术后不久就接受了100 mCi(3.75 GBq)的I131治疗,而第二组患者则在甲状腺手术后观察到进展迹象(血清甲状腺球蛋白水平升高和US/CT疑似发现)时推迟接受RAI治疗。结果显示5 年后,RAI 术后局部复发(第一组 1 例,第二组 2 例)和/或远处转移(t 检验,P = 0.58)在组间无明显差异。所有颈部复发病例均接受了后续手术切除治疗,在规定的随访期内没有新的进展数据。结论对于有少量Ⅵ度微转移的甲状腺乳头状癌Т1N1a患者,RAI辅助治疗可能并非必要。通过甲状腺球蛋白水平升高和使用可视化技术进行仔细随访时发现的局部和远处转移灶,可以通过推迟 RAI 治疗和/或手术进行有效治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radioiodine ablation after thyroidectomy could be safely abandoned or postponed in selected stage I papillary thyroid carcinoma patients of low-risk group: an observational prospective study
Background. The European Thyroid Association consensus for the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (2006) suggested to avoid radioactive iodine (RAI) after thyroidectomy in patients with unifocal microcarcinoma (≤ 1 cm) with no extension beyond the thyroid capsule and without lymph node metastases. As the new data was collected and the risk stratification was revised, in 2022 the same recommendation was expanded to the patients with microcarcinoma and central neck lymph node involvement. The American Thyroid Association guidelines (2015) advocated no RAI ablation after hemi- or total thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer less than 1 cm with 5 and less micrometastases up to 2 mm in central neck lymph nodes as this strategy has no negative impact on the disease prognosis. In low-risk patients, no sufficient evidence of the obligatory postsurgical radioiodine ablation has been yet demonstrated. The aim of our study was to reveal whether RAI after thyroidectomy can be abandoned or postponed until the disease progression is confirmed in low-risk patients. Materials and methods. Two groups of patients (30 per group, 60 in total) with papillary microcarcinoma Т1N1a (5 and less level VI micrometastases up to 2 mm) were observed during a 5-year follow-up. In the first group, patients received 100 mCi (3.75 GBq) I131 shortly after total thyroidectomy while in the second group, postponed RAI was applied when progression signs were observed (elevated serum thyroglobulin level and US/CT suspected findings) after thyroid surgery. Results. After 5 years, no significant difference between groups was observed regarding post-RAI local recurrences (one in the first group and two in the second group) and/or distant metastases (t-test, p = 0.58). All cases of neck recurrences were treated with subsequent surgical excision, with no new data of progression within the specified follow-up. Conclusions. RAI adjuvant therapy for papillary thyroid carcinoma Т1N1a may not be necessary for patients with small number of level VI micrometastases. Local and distant metastases revealed during the careful follow-up by thyroglobulin level elevation and when using visualization techniques can be effectively treated with postponed RAI therapy and/or surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信