获得防滑认证的职业鞋类的机械摩擦评估比较

Lasse Jakobsen, Timo Bagehorn, Ion Sivebaek, F. G. Lysdal
{"title":"获得防滑认证的职业鞋类的机械摩擦评估比较","authors":"Lasse Jakobsen, Timo Bagehorn, Ion Sivebaek, F. G. Lysdal","doi":"10.1177/13506501241234981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Slipping is a major cause of occupational accidents and numerous footwear factors and features, as well as the testing conditions, affects a shoe's ability to resist slipping. The aim of this study was to compare slip resistance certification data from five certified shoes with measurements performed on a mechanical test setup in accordance with the ISO 20347:2012 standard, as well as determining their performance in a biofidelic setup that resembles the biomechanics of slipping. Certification data attributed Shoe #3 with the highest slip resistance, and our mechanical assessment of the same footwear models showed that Shoe #2 had the higher slip resistance and was superior under more biofidelic testing parameters. Based on our mechanical evaluations, specific engineering considerations such as an increase in both the heel beveling and the midsole thickness can advantageously enhance slip resistance. Further investigation in a clinical setting will provide insights on how these engineered footwear adjustments could enhance friction and ultimately enhance occupational safety.","PeriodicalId":509096,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology","volume":"127 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of mechanical friction evaluations from occupational footwear certified as slip resistant\",\"authors\":\"Lasse Jakobsen, Timo Bagehorn, Ion Sivebaek, F. G. Lysdal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13506501241234981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Slipping is a major cause of occupational accidents and numerous footwear factors and features, as well as the testing conditions, affects a shoe's ability to resist slipping. The aim of this study was to compare slip resistance certification data from five certified shoes with measurements performed on a mechanical test setup in accordance with the ISO 20347:2012 standard, as well as determining their performance in a biofidelic setup that resembles the biomechanics of slipping. Certification data attributed Shoe #3 with the highest slip resistance, and our mechanical assessment of the same footwear models showed that Shoe #2 had the higher slip resistance and was superior under more biofidelic testing parameters. Based on our mechanical evaluations, specific engineering considerations such as an increase in both the heel beveling and the midsole thickness can advantageously enhance slip resistance. Further investigation in a clinical setting will provide insights on how these engineered footwear adjustments could enhance friction and ultimately enhance occupational safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology\",\"volume\":\"127 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13506501241234981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13506501241234981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑倒是职业事故的一个主要原因,鞋类的众多因素和特征以及测试条件都会影响鞋子的防滑能力。本研究的目的是比较五款认证鞋的防滑认证数据与根据 ISO 20347:2012 标准在机械测试装置上进行的测量结果,并确定它们在类似滑倒生物力学的生物保真装置中的性能。认证数据显示 3 号鞋具有最高的防滑性,而我们对相同鞋款进行的机械评估显示,2 号鞋具有更高的防滑性,并且在更符合生物保真度的测试参数下更胜一筹。根据我们的机械评估结果,具体的工程考虑因素(如增加鞋跟斜面和中底厚度)可有效提高防滑性。在临床环境中的进一步研究将有助于深入了解这些工程鞋类调整如何增强摩擦力,并最终提高职业安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of mechanical friction evaluations from occupational footwear certified as slip resistant
Slipping is a major cause of occupational accidents and numerous footwear factors and features, as well as the testing conditions, affects a shoe's ability to resist slipping. The aim of this study was to compare slip resistance certification data from five certified shoes with measurements performed on a mechanical test setup in accordance with the ISO 20347:2012 standard, as well as determining their performance in a biofidelic setup that resembles the biomechanics of slipping. Certification data attributed Shoe #3 with the highest slip resistance, and our mechanical assessment of the same footwear models showed that Shoe #2 had the higher slip resistance and was superior under more biofidelic testing parameters. Based on our mechanical evaluations, specific engineering considerations such as an increase in both the heel beveling and the midsole thickness can advantageously enhance slip resistance. Further investigation in a clinical setting will provide insights on how these engineered footwear adjustments could enhance friction and ultimately enhance occupational safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信