评估巴西一所大学在 STEM 领域的性别刻板印象的影响

Economia Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1108/econ-05-2022-0025
Camila Alvarenga, C. Braga
{"title":"评估巴西一所大学在 STEM 领域的性别刻板印象的影响","authors":"Camila Alvarenga, C. Braga","doi":"10.1108/econ-05-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn Brazil, over 4.7 million women enrolled in university in the year 2017. However, Brazilian women have been consistently overrepresented in humanities and care majors and underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Given that observed gender differences in math-intensive fields have lasting effects on gender inequality in the labor market, and that observed gender variations do not necessarily associate with differences in innate ability, in this paper we explore the paths of societal gender bias and gender differences in a Brazilian university.Design/methodology/approachWe conduct a social experiment at a University in Southeastern Brazil, applying the gender-STEM Implicit Association Test.FindingsWe found that women in STEM are less likely to show gender-STEM implicit stereotypes, compared to women in humanities. The results indicate a negative correlation between implicit gender stereotyping and the choice of math-intensive majors by women.Originality/valueThe stereotype-congruent results are indicative of the gender bias in Brazilian society, and suggest that stereotypes created at early stages in life are directly related to future outcomes that reinforce gender disparities in Brazil, which can be observed in career choices.","PeriodicalId":512358,"journal":{"name":"Economia","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effects of gender stereotype in STEM in a Brazilian university\",\"authors\":\"Camila Alvarenga, C. Braga\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/econ-05-2022-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn Brazil, over 4.7 million women enrolled in university in the year 2017. However, Brazilian women have been consistently overrepresented in humanities and care majors and underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Given that observed gender differences in math-intensive fields have lasting effects on gender inequality in the labor market, and that observed gender variations do not necessarily associate with differences in innate ability, in this paper we explore the paths of societal gender bias and gender differences in a Brazilian university.Design/methodology/approachWe conduct a social experiment at a University in Southeastern Brazil, applying the gender-STEM Implicit Association Test.FindingsWe found that women in STEM are less likely to show gender-STEM implicit stereotypes, compared to women in humanities. The results indicate a negative correlation between implicit gender stereotyping and the choice of math-intensive majors by women.Originality/valueThe stereotype-congruent results are indicative of the gender bias in Brazilian society, and suggest that stereotypes created at early stages in life are directly related to future outcomes that reinforce gender disparities in Brazil, which can be observed in career choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economia\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/econ-05-2022-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/econ-05-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在巴西,2017 年有超过 470 万名女性进入大学学习。然而,巴西女性在人文和护理专业中的比例一直偏高,而在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)专业中的比例却偏低。鉴于在数学密集型领域观察到的性别差异会对劳动力市场上的性别不平等产生持久影响,而且观察到的性别差异并不一定与先天能力差异有关,本文探讨了巴西一所大学中社会性别偏见和性别差异的路径。设计/方法/途径我们在巴西东南部的一所大学进行了一项社会实验,应用了性别-STEM内隐关联测试。结果表明,内隐的性别刻板印象与女性选择数学密集型专业之间存在负相关关系。原创性/价值刻板印象一致的结果表明了巴西社会的性别偏见,并表明在人生早期阶段形成的刻板印象与未来的结果直接相关,而未来的结果会强化巴西的性别差异,这一点可以在职业选择中观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the effects of gender stereotype in STEM in a Brazilian university
PurposeIn Brazil, over 4.7 million women enrolled in university in the year 2017. However, Brazilian women have been consistently overrepresented in humanities and care majors and underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Given that observed gender differences in math-intensive fields have lasting effects on gender inequality in the labor market, and that observed gender variations do not necessarily associate with differences in innate ability, in this paper we explore the paths of societal gender bias and gender differences in a Brazilian university.Design/methodology/approachWe conduct a social experiment at a University in Southeastern Brazil, applying the gender-STEM Implicit Association Test.FindingsWe found that women in STEM are less likely to show gender-STEM implicit stereotypes, compared to women in humanities. The results indicate a negative correlation between implicit gender stereotyping and the choice of math-intensive majors by women.Originality/valueThe stereotype-congruent results are indicative of the gender bias in Brazilian society, and suggest that stereotypes created at early stages in life are directly related to future outcomes that reinforce gender disparities in Brazil, which can be observed in career choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信