通过刺激大脑来提高运动成绩?经颅直流电刺激对运动表现的影响综述所提供的证据

Darias Holgado, Daniel Sanabria, Miguel A. Vadillo, Rafael Roman Caballero
{"title":"通过刺激大脑来提高运动成绩?经颅直流电刺激对运动表现的影响综述所提供的证据","authors":"Darias Holgado, Daniel Sanabria, Miguel A. Vadillo, Rafael Roman Caballero","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.07.24303915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concepts such as \"neuro-doping\" or brain doping have contributed to an expansion in the area of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and its impact over exercise and physical performance in recent years. Here we assess the evidence supporting the healthy population using an umbrella review of meta-analyses investigating the role of tDCS to enhance exercise performance. We identified 9 meta-analyses encompassing 50 crossover studies and 683 participants that met our inclusion criteria. Despite the fact that most meta-analyses reported a positive effect of tDCS, our analyses revealed overly low statistical power in the primary studies, publication bias, and large variability in pre-processing and analytic decisions. Indeed, a specification-curve analysis showed that the final effect could range from g = −0.23 to g = 0.33, depending on decisions such as the formula used for estimating the effect size and multiple additional analytic steps. Moreover, a meta-analysis of all the primary studies included in the umbrella review showed a small effect of tDCS (gz = 0.28, 95%CI [0.18, 0.39]) that became substantially smaller and inconclusive after accounting for publication bias, grm = 0.10, 95%CrI [−0.04, 0.20], BF10 = 0.99. In summary, our findings highlight that current evidence, from both individual studies and meta-analyses, does not conclusively support the idea that tDCS enhances performance outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501122,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Sports Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zapping the brain to enhance sport performance? Evidence from an umbrella review of the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on physical performance\",\"authors\":\"Darias Holgado, Daniel Sanabria, Miguel A. Vadillo, Rafael Roman Caballero\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.07.24303915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concepts such as \\\"neuro-doping\\\" or brain doping have contributed to an expansion in the area of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and its impact over exercise and physical performance in recent years. Here we assess the evidence supporting the healthy population using an umbrella review of meta-analyses investigating the role of tDCS to enhance exercise performance. We identified 9 meta-analyses encompassing 50 crossover studies and 683 participants that met our inclusion criteria. Despite the fact that most meta-analyses reported a positive effect of tDCS, our analyses revealed overly low statistical power in the primary studies, publication bias, and large variability in pre-processing and analytic decisions. Indeed, a specification-curve analysis showed that the final effect could range from g = −0.23 to g = 0.33, depending on decisions such as the formula used for estimating the effect size and multiple additional analytic steps. Moreover, a meta-analysis of all the primary studies included in the umbrella review showed a small effect of tDCS (gz = 0.28, 95%CI [0.18, 0.39]) that became substantially smaller and inconclusive after accounting for publication bias, grm = 0.10, 95%CrI [−0.04, 0.20], BF10 = 0.99. In summary, our findings highlight that current evidence, from both individual studies and meta-analyses, does not conclusively support the idea that tDCS enhances performance outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,"神经兴奋剂 "或 "脑兴奋剂 "等概念促使经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)领域及其对运动和身体表现的影响不断扩大。在此,我们通过对研究 tDCS 在提高运动表现方面作用的荟萃分析进行综述,对支持健康人群的证据进行评估。我们确定了 9 项荟萃分析,包括 50 项交叉研究和 683 名符合纳入标准的参与者。尽管大多数荟萃分析都报告了 tDCS 的积极作用,但我们的分析表明,主要研究的统计能力过低,存在发表偏差,预处理和分析决策的变异性较大。事实上,规格曲线分析表明,最终效应可能从 g = -0.23 到 g = 0.33 不等,这取决于所使用的效应大小估计公式和多个附加分析步骤等决策。此外,对总括综述中包含的所有主要研究进行的荟萃分析表明,tDCS 的效应较小(gz = 0.28,95%CI [0.18,0.39]),在考虑了发表偏倚后,效应变得更小,且不确定,grm = 0.10,95%CrI [-0.04,0.20],BF10 = 0.99。总之,我们的研究结果突出表明,目前来自单项研究和荟萃分析的证据并不能最终支持 tDCS 可提高成绩的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zapping the brain to enhance sport performance? Evidence from an umbrella review of the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on physical performance
Concepts such as "neuro-doping" or brain doping have contributed to an expansion in the area of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and its impact over exercise and physical performance in recent years. Here we assess the evidence supporting the healthy population using an umbrella review of meta-analyses investigating the role of tDCS to enhance exercise performance. We identified 9 meta-analyses encompassing 50 crossover studies and 683 participants that met our inclusion criteria. Despite the fact that most meta-analyses reported a positive effect of tDCS, our analyses revealed overly low statistical power in the primary studies, publication bias, and large variability in pre-processing and analytic decisions. Indeed, a specification-curve analysis showed that the final effect could range from g = −0.23 to g = 0.33, depending on decisions such as the formula used for estimating the effect size and multiple additional analytic steps. Moreover, a meta-analysis of all the primary studies included in the umbrella review showed a small effect of tDCS (gz = 0.28, 95%CI [0.18, 0.39]) that became substantially smaller and inconclusive after accounting for publication bias, grm = 0.10, 95%CrI [−0.04, 0.20], BF10 = 0.99. In summary, our findings highlight that current evidence, from both individual studies and meta-analyses, does not conclusively support the idea that tDCS enhances performance outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信