盐沼、海滩和混合海岸线系统脆弱性评估应用回顾

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
{"title":"盐沼、海滩和混合海岸线系统脆弱性评估应用回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s13157-024-01790-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>With increasing threats from climate change and direct human impacts to coastal systems, vulnerability assessment approaches have been developed to enable prioritisation of management actions. This study reviewed vulnerability assessment literature about saltmarsh, beach and mixed shoreline systems published in English. Literature searches and NVivo software were used to analyse literature available, indicative of patterns and gaps in research. Results showed thirteen different methods used in selected literature to assess vulnerability, and the most commonly used was the indices approach. In saltmarsh systems, most articles employed unique methods rather than repeating established ones, and spatial change methods were rare. The majority of research did not include definitions of vulnerability or an indication of which conceptualisation of vulnerability was being used. Most literature assessed vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise, rather than natural hazards or other human impacts. The mangrove vulnerability assessment literature was far more voluminous relative to applications to beach, saltmarsh or mixed such systems. This review identifies how future research can better assess gaps in knowledge, and progress more unified understanding of coastal vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Applications of Vulnerability Assessments to Saltmarsh, Beach, and Mixed Shoreline Systems\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13157-024-01790-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>With increasing threats from climate change and direct human impacts to coastal systems, vulnerability assessment approaches have been developed to enable prioritisation of management actions. This study reviewed vulnerability assessment literature about saltmarsh, beach and mixed shoreline systems published in English. Literature searches and NVivo software were used to analyse literature available, indicative of patterns and gaps in research. Results showed thirteen different methods used in selected literature to assess vulnerability, and the most commonly used was the indices approach. In saltmarsh systems, most articles employed unique methods rather than repeating established ones, and spatial change methods were rare. The majority of research did not include definitions of vulnerability or an indication of which conceptualisation of vulnerability was being used. Most literature assessed vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise, rather than natural hazards or other human impacts. The mangrove vulnerability assessment literature was far more voluminous relative to applications to beach, saltmarsh or mixed such systems. This review identifies how future research can better assess gaps in knowledge, and progress more unified understanding of coastal vulnerability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wetlands\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wetlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01790-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01790-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 随着气候变化的威胁和人类对沿岸系统的直接影响不断增加,人们开发了脆弱性评估方 法,以确定管理行动的优先次序。本研究审查了用英文发表的有关盐沼、海滩和混合海岸线系统脆弱性评估的文献。使用文献检索和 NVivo 软件分析了现有文献,指出了研究的模式和差距。结果显示,所选文献中使用了 13 种不同的方法来评估脆弱性,其中最常用的是指数法。在盐沼系统中,大多数文章都采用了独特的方法,而不是重复已有的方法,空间变化方法很少见。大多数研究没有包含脆弱性的定义,也没有说明使用的是哪种脆弱性概念。大多数文献评估的是对气候变化和海平面上升的脆弱性,而不是对自然灾害或其他人类影响的脆弱性。与海滩、盐沼或混合系统相比,红树林脆弱性评估的文献要多得多。本综述指出了今后的研究如何才能更好地评估知识差距,并对沿岸脆弱性有更统一的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Applications of Vulnerability Assessments to Saltmarsh, Beach, and Mixed Shoreline Systems

Abstract

With increasing threats from climate change and direct human impacts to coastal systems, vulnerability assessment approaches have been developed to enable prioritisation of management actions. This study reviewed vulnerability assessment literature about saltmarsh, beach and mixed shoreline systems published in English. Literature searches and NVivo software were used to analyse literature available, indicative of patterns and gaps in research. Results showed thirteen different methods used in selected literature to assess vulnerability, and the most commonly used was the indices approach. In saltmarsh systems, most articles employed unique methods rather than repeating established ones, and spatial change methods were rare. The majority of research did not include definitions of vulnerability or an indication of which conceptualisation of vulnerability was being used. Most literature assessed vulnerability to climate change and sea level rise, rather than natural hazards or other human impacts. The mangrove vulnerability assessment literature was far more voluminous relative to applications to beach, saltmarsh or mixed such systems. This review identifies how future research can better assess gaps in knowledge, and progress more unified understanding of coastal vulnerability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信