心力衰竭患者共同就医以进行住院后随访:随机对照试验

Tracey H Taveira, Lisa B. Cohen, Sharon LaForest, Karen Oliver, Melanie Parent, Renee Hearns, Sherry Ball, sandesh dev, Wen-Chih Wu
{"title":"心力衰竭患者共同就医以进行住院后随访:随机对照试验","authors":"Tracey H Taveira, Lisa B. Cohen, Sharon LaForest, Karen Oliver, Melanie Parent, Renee Hearns, Sherry Ball, sandesh dev, Wen-Chih Wu","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.04.24303754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF-SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high-risk patients discharged with HF.\nMethods: A 3-site, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF hospitalization were randomized to receive either HF-SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual-care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF-SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2-hour session HF-SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by EQ5D-VAS and cardiac health status by KCCQ, 180 days post-randomization.\nResults: Of the 242 patients enrolled (HF-SMA n=117, usual-care n=125, mean age 69.3±9.4 years, 71.5% white, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF-SMA and n=9 usual-care patients died). After 180 days, both HF-SMA and usual-care participants had similar and significant improvements from baseline in KCCQ, but only HF-SMA participants had significant improvements in EQ5D-VAS (mean change = 7.2 +/- 15.8 in HF-SMA versus -0.4 +/- 19.0 points in usual-care, p<0.001). Conclusion: Both HF-SMA and usual care in HF participants achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF-SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. A larger population and a longer follow-up time are needed in future studies to evaluate re-hospitalization and death outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"298 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure For Post-hospitalization Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Tracey H Taveira, Lisa B. Cohen, Sharon LaForest, Karen Oliver, Melanie Parent, Renee Hearns, Sherry Ball, sandesh dev, Wen-Chih Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.04.24303754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF-SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high-risk patients discharged with HF.\\nMethods: A 3-site, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF hospitalization were randomized to receive either HF-SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual-care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF-SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2-hour session HF-SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by EQ5D-VAS and cardiac health status by KCCQ, 180 days post-randomization.\\nResults: Of the 242 patients enrolled (HF-SMA n=117, usual-care n=125, mean age 69.3±9.4 years, 71.5% white, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF-SMA and n=9 usual-care patients died). After 180 days, both HF-SMA and usual-care participants had similar and significant improvements from baseline in KCCQ, but only HF-SMA participants had significant improvements in EQ5D-VAS (mean change = 7.2 +/- 15.8 in HF-SMA versus -0.4 +/- 19.0 points in usual-care, p<0.001). Conclusion: Both HF-SMA and usual care in HF participants achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF-SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. A larger population and a longer follow-up time are needed in future studies to evaluate re-hospitalization and death outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement\",\"volume\":\"298 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭(HF)共享医疗预约(SMA)是指多名心力衰竭患者同时与多学科医疗人员会面,以获得高效、全面的医疗服务。HF-SMA能否改善出院的高危心衰患者的总体健康状况和心脏健康状况,目前尚不清楚:方法: 在 3 个地点进行了一项开放标签、随机对照试验。心房颤动住院 12 周内的参与者按 1:1 的比例随机接受心房颤动-SMA 或常规心房颤动临床护理(常规护理)。HF-SMA团队由护士、营养师、心理学家、执业护士和/或临床药剂师组成,提供4次每次2小时的HF-SMA课程,每隔一周举行一次,持续8周。主要结果是随机后180天内通过EQ5D-VAS测量的总体健康状况和通过KCCQ测量的心脏健康状况:在 242 名入选患者中(HF-SMA 117 人,常规护理 125 人,平均年龄 69.3±9.4 岁,71.5% 白人,94.6% 男性),84% 的参与者完成了研究(HF-SMA 死亡 8 人,常规护理死亡 9 人)。180 天后,HF-SMA 和常规护理参与者的 KCCQ 与基线相比均有相似且显著的改善,但只有 HF-SMA 参与者的 EQ5D-VAS 有显著改善(HF-SMA 的平均变化 = 7.2 +/- 15.8,而常规护理为 -0.4 +/- 19.0 点,p<0.001)。结论高频三联疗法和常规护理都能显著改善高频患者的心脏健康状况,但只有通过高频三联疗法的团队方法才能显著改善总体健康状况。未来的研究需要更多的人群和更长的随访时间来评估再住院和死亡的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure For Post-hospitalization Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF-SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high-risk patients discharged with HF. Methods: A 3-site, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF hospitalization were randomized to receive either HF-SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual-care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF-SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2-hour session HF-SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by EQ5D-VAS and cardiac health status by KCCQ, 180 days post-randomization. Results: Of the 242 patients enrolled (HF-SMA n=117, usual-care n=125, mean age 69.3±9.4 years, 71.5% white, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF-SMA and n=9 usual-care patients died). After 180 days, both HF-SMA and usual-care participants had similar and significant improvements from baseline in KCCQ, but only HF-SMA participants had significant improvements in EQ5D-VAS (mean change = 7.2 +/- 15.8 in HF-SMA versus -0.4 +/- 19.0 points in usual-care, p<0.001). Conclusion: Both HF-SMA and usual care in HF participants achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF-SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. A larger population and a longer follow-up time are needed in future studies to evaluate re-hospitalization and death outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信