斯塔克尔伯格-帕雷托综合法

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Véronique Bruyère, Baptiste Fievet, Jean-François Raskin, Clément Tamines
{"title":"斯塔克尔伯格-帕雷托综合法","authors":"Véronique Bruyère, Baptiste Fievet, Jean-François Raskin, Clément Tamines","doi":"10.1145/3651162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study the framework of two-player Stackelberg games played on graphs in which Player 0 announces a strategy and Player 1 responds rationally with a strategy that is an optimal response. While it is usually assumed that Player 1 has a single objective, we consider here the new setting where he has several. In this context, after responding with his strategy, Player 1 gets a payoff in the form of a vector of Booleans corresponding to his satisfied objectives. Rationality of Player 1 is encoded by the fact that his response must produce a Pareto-optimal payoff given the strategy of Player 0. We study for several kinds of <i>ω</i>-regular objectives the Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis problem which asks whether Player 0 can announce a strategy which satisfies his objective, whatever the rational response of Player 1. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable for games in which objectives are all reachability, safety, Büchi, co-Büchi, Boolean Büchi, parity, Muller, Streett or Rabin objectives. We also show that this problem is \\(\\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \\)-complete except for the cases of Büchi objectives for which it is \\(\\mathsf {NP} \\)-complete and co-Büchi objectives for which it is in \\(\\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \\) and \\(\\mathsf {NP} \\)-hard. The problem is already \\(\\mathsf {NP} \\)-complete in the simple case of reachability objectives and graphs that are trees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50916,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Véronique Bruyère, Baptiste Fievet, Jean-François Raskin, Clément Tamines\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3651162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We study the framework of two-player Stackelberg games played on graphs in which Player 0 announces a strategy and Player 1 responds rationally with a strategy that is an optimal response. While it is usually assumed that Player 1 has a single objective, we consider here the new setting where he has several. In this context, after responding with his strategy, Player 1 gets a payoff in the form of a vector of Booleans corresponding to his satisfied objectives. Rationality of Player 1 is encoded by the fact that his response must produce a Pareto-optimal payoff given the strategy of Player 0. We study for several kinds of <i>ω</i>-regular objectives the Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis problem which asks whether Player 0 can announce a strategy which satisfies his objective, whatever the rational response of Player 1. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable for games in which objectives are all reachability, safety, Büchi, co-Büchi, Boolean Büchi, parity, Muller, Streett or Rabin objectives. We also show that this problem is \\\\(\\\\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \\\\)-complete except for the cases of Büchi objectives for which it is \\\\(\\\\mathsf {NP} \\\\)-complete and co-Büchi objectives for which it is in \\\\(\\\\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \\\\) and \\\\(\\\\mathsf {NP} \\\\)-hard. The problem is already \\\\(\\\\mathsf {NP} \\\\)-complete in the simple case of reachability objectives and graphs that are trees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3651162\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3651162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究的是在图上进行的双人斯塔克尔伯格博弈的框架,在这个博弈中,0 号玩家宣布一个策略,1 号玩家理性地回应一个最优策略。通常假定玩家 1 只有一个目标,而我们在此考虑的是他有多个目标的新情况。在这种情况下,玩家 1 在回应策略后,会得到一个布尔值向量形式的报酬,这个布尔值向量与他所满足的目标相对应。对于几种 ω 规则目标,我们研究了斯塔克尔伯格-帕雷托综合问题,该问题问的是,无论玩家 1 做出怎样的理性回应,玩家 0 是否都能宣布一个满足其目标的策略。我们证明,对于目标都是可达性、安全性、布奇、共布奇、布尔布奇、奇偶性、穆勒、斯特拉特或拉宾目标的博弈,这个问题是固定参数可处理的。我们还证明了这个问题是(\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \)-完全的,除了布奇目标的情况是(\mathsf {NP} \)-完全的,以及共布奇目标的情况是(\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \)和(\mathsf {NP} \)-困难的。在可达性目标和图是树的简单情况下,这个问题已经是 \(\mathsf {NP} \)-完备的了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis

We study the framework of two-player Stackelberg games played on graphs in which Player 0 announces a strategy and Player 1 responds rationally with a strategy that is an optimal response. While it is usually assumed that Player 1 has a single objective, we consider here the new setting where he has several. In this context, after responding with his strategy, Player 1 gets a payoff in the form of a vector of Booleans corresponding to his satisfied objectives. Rationality of Player 1 is encoded by the fact that his response must produce a Pareto-optimal payoff given the strategy of Player 0. We study for several kinds of ω-regular objectives the Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis problem which asks whether Player 0 can announce a strategy which satisfies his objective, whatever the rational response of Player 1. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable for games in which objectives are all reachability, safety, Büchi, co-Büchi, Boolean Büchi, parity, Muller, Streett or Rabin objectives. We also show that this problem is \(\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \)-complete except for the cases of Büchi objectives for which it is \(\mathsf {NP} \)-complete and co-Büchi objectives for which it is in \(\mathsf {NEXPTIME} \) and \(\mathsf {NP} \)-hard. The problem is already \(\mathsf {NP} \)-complete in the simple case of reachability objectives and graphs that are trees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: TOCL welcomes submissions related to all aspects of logic as it pertains to topics in computer science. This area has a great tradition in computer science. Several researchers who earned the ACM Turing award have also contributed to this field, namely Edgar Codd (relational database systems), Stephen Cook (complexity of logical theories), Edsger W. Dijkstra, Robert W. Floyd, Tony Hoare, Amir Pnueli, Dana Scott, Edmond M. Clarke, Allen E. Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis (program logics, program derivation and verification, programming languages semantics), Robin Milner (interactive theorem proving, concurrency calculi, and functional programming), and John McCarthy (functional programming and logics in AI). Logic continues to play an important role in computer science and has permeated several of its areas, including artificial intelligence, computational complexity, database systems, and programming languages. The Editorial Board of this journal seeks and hopes to attract high-quality submissions in all the above-mentioned areas of computational logic so that TOCL becomes the standard reference in the field. Both theoretical and applied papers are sought. Submissions showing novel use of logic in computer science are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信